HookyP

Good morning fellow travellers. So you’ve noticed the immigration problem - despite the promises of multiple election results and one huge referendum result to halt it - just isn’t going away? They tell you YoY numbers are down but that’s only because they went so insanely parabolic previously. And they singularly fail to mention that just this year, so far, we allowed a Portsmouth sized amount of non EEA migrants to come here - hat tip @charliecolecc who is doing excellent work on this. Many people ask the entirely reasonable and correct question: “But, if we the British people voted against it, then why does this happen at all?” The answer is simple. The modern globalist model runs on labour arbitrage. Import cheap labour, legal and otherwise, and wages stay flat. Flat wages keep inflation contained, which matters more in Britain than almost anywhere else: roughly a quarter of our gilts are index-linked, so every point of CPI goes straight onto the interest bill on £3 trillion of debt. Contained inflation keeps rates down, cheap money keeps asset prices up, and high asset prices keep the donor class happy. It's a closed loop, and everyone outside it pays to keep it running. The AI age will change this. Once the immutable data on what these migrants do is widely distributed and interrogated and understood so the population understands in unequivocal terms that 99% of them add nothing but take as much as they can from taxpayer funded initiatives the mood music will change. I suggest taking the approach Denmark has with the excellent @jonatanpallesen in this respect. Pure data that proves the anecdotal experience. But, and here is the kicker, automation will be hugely long term deflationary. It will also mean that our own high trust and educated people - especially in white collar jobs - will, for a period, experience a displacement of job opportunities where they lose employment altogether or rehire lower down the income distribution; an Engel’s pause basically whilst the new labour paradigm shifts into gear, certain jobs are wage and status privileged for a period (eg the build out) and eventually new white collar (and other) jobs are created. There will then - given the numbers - be too many people per job. As we will have to absorb the displaced or lost jobs of our own people at scale, the cost of the welfare to subsidise foreign workers low pay, let alone foreign indolents free lifestyles - ON TOP - will not be affordable in this transition. Which means the umbilical cord of state sponsored welfare will be cut. Which means these people will have no incentive to stay. Which means they will start to leave. Of their own accord. You can, of course, also create a hostile environment to encourage them to leave peacefully if their own accord or even pay them to leave (cheaper than paying them to stay which is what we effectively do now). This is the most moderate option on the table based on historic precedent where such periods of dislocation and social unrest lead to ugly inhumane mass civil conflict. So you limit what access to state services they can get. There are a host of other humane and reasonable options too that I leave others more attuned to the culture war to opine on; I am purely interested in the socio economic vector, and what it costs. Currently it is clear to me that only @RestoreBritain and @SDPhq understand this, or, have the minerals to state it publicly and offer viable humane solutions. I am currently finishing off an article on this very topic - which I see as being the greatest existential threat to Britain that exists. As @trevgoes4th has (so often) presciently stated “AI = the white walkers and everything else is downstream noise”. This piece is complex and has taken weeks to write - but it will set out a grand plan for Britain to become truly sovereign again. Busy weekend just started, so will publish Tuesday next week. Hope you’re all having a good one! Best wishes, AFC