Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer) header
Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer) profile picture

Novelist & full-time Homesteader

United States
Joined March 2019
Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)Photo by Growing Back to the Land (@HomesteadHer)
Replying to @Macbaconai
Yup. Built to prove the impossible can be accomplished if you consider the frequency of its creation. That means creating a frequency of consciousness to bring it into existence.
4
2
32
4,534
Growing Back to the Land retweeted
✨ Love is the only religion ✨
9
40
5
170
2,941
Growing Back to the Land retweeted
let there be light
17
41
6
172
5,591
Hot ham and cheese. Late-night pre- birthday celebration. 🥳🎁🪩
2
40
Dinner was ❤️‍🔥 🥪
1
5
55
Hot sauce. 🌶️🌶️🌶️
3
38
Homemade sammich bread on standby. 😋
1
5
62
Smoking the pork tenderloin I soft cured last week for dinner tonight. #tuesdayvibe
1
4
78
Leftovers from last night. 💕
8
147
Would anyone like something to eat? 🥰🥰
1
3
52
Growing Back to the Land retweeted
the aliens visited if you were paying attention
7
13
113
2,165
Growing Back to the Land retweeted
Happy Diwali 🕯️🎇✨
48
231
21
1,116
19,774
Growing Back to the Land retweeted
"All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone." Blaise Pascal, Pensées
3
2
11
329
Growing Back to the Land retweeted
🥰❤️‍🔥
Google DeepMind discovered a terrifying blind spot in every major AI model. They found that attaching image of red heart (❤️) to your coding prompt makes AI pick a completely different solution method that it wouldn't normally pick 100% of the time.. Researchers gave models a standard coding problem. Normally, AI prefers to write standard iterative loops to solve these tasks. Then, they tried something weird. They dropped a simple image of a red heart into the prompt alongside the code. The AI's logic instantly warped. When Claude and GPT-5 saw the red heart, they completely abandoned their default approach and switched to complex recursive code 100% of the time. When Gemini saw a yellow checkmark, it switched to recursion 90% of the time. Here is why this is so dangerous: It wasn't the concept of a heart. When researchers replaced the image with the text caption "a red heart," nothing happened. The text did not steer the AI. The raw pixels of the symbol hijacked the model's underlying reasoning architecture. It gets worse. The AI had no idea its mind had been changed by a picture. When the researchers checked the AI's internal "thinking" traces, the models completely ignored the image. Instead, they hallucinated fake, highly technical reasons for why they chose to use recursion. They misattributed their own decisions 75% of the time. Right now, tech companies are racing to build autonomous agents that read our screens and navigate the visual web. But this paper reveals that an agent's logic can be fundamentally rewritten by a stray icon on a webpage. And you will never see the true cause in the reasoning logs. We thought we were teaching AI to see the world. It turns out, we just gave it a new way to be manipulated.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The described effects were shown for specific models (Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.4) on one coding task with particular symbols, not every major AI model or broad agent manipulation. arxiv.org/abs/2610.36449
2
1
3
109
Growing Back to the Land retweeted
1
41