
Head of Savings & Retirement at @avivaplc ... runner, cycler, golfer and tenor. My views. [email protected]
UK
Joined September 2012
- Tweets16.4K
- Following1.6K
- Followers2.6K
- Likes10.6K
Pinned Tweet
That was fun! Great to talk about work, life and pensions with the brilliant Jack Parsons of the brilliant Youth Group. @JacksonRParsons @TheYouthGroupHQ
youtube.com/live/NYRB6iJ04R4…
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Arguably, reforming the pension triple lock is the first “difficult decision” this government has taken.
Pensions will STILL RISE – but (sounds like) they won't ratchet up in an uncertain & unpredictable way. The latter is good news for the public finances
Well done Andy Burnham
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Thank you for reading to the end of my thread. As a reward, here's a free-to-read link to my column in today's @FinancialTimes as.ft.com/r/6703f455-2516-45…
Now, tell me what you plan to do about this! #ageism
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Retirement – ordinary people being able to enjoy years of leisure after a lifetime of work – is in the premier league of 20th century achievements.
We’ve just set out the biggest pension reforms in a generation to safeguard it for workers in the 21st. Here’s what they’ll do.
Alistair McQueen retweeted
This story is just wrong
Millions more people face having to work until they are 68 before being able to claim their pension under plans to bring forward a rise in the state retirement age, @oliver_wright reports
The state pension age is due to gradually rise to 68 between April 2044 and April 2046. It will reach 68 for those born on or after April 6, 1978
However, Treasury officials have told the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government’s fiscal forecaster, that the “current policy” is to bring the increase in the retirement age forward by at least seven years, to 2037
This would mean that about five million people who are aged between 49 and 55 at present would have to work for an additional year before being eligible for their state pension, costing them about £12,500
The decision would save the government about £6 billion a year from 2037 compared with the present timetable
Last year ministers launched a review of the state pension age led by the Government Actuary’s Department and Suzy Morrissey, deputy director of the Pensions Policy Institute. It is due to make recommendations on when the pension age should rise before the government legislates for any change. Ministers have insisted no final decision has been taken
However, in a response to the OBR, the Treasury said the government’s intention was to bring forward the pension age rise towards the end of the next decade
The OBR said: “We assume that the state pension rises to 68 in 2037-39. The Treasury has confirmed to us that this is the government’s current policy position, rather than the legislated increase set in the Pensions Act 2007.”
thetimes.com/article/b747038…
Alistair McQueen retweeted
The right policy change.
But advancing state pension age entitlement at 68 from 2044 to 2037 does need legislation this parliament, and good comms. The change is, in reality, 1 extra year for those presently aged between 49-55.
Millions more people face having to work until they are 68 before being able to claim their pension under plans to bring forward a rise in the state retirement age, @oliver_wright reports
The state pension age is due to gradually rise to 68 between April 2044 and April 2046. It will reach 68 for those born on or after April 6, 1978
However, Treasury officials have told the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government’s fiscal forecaster, that the “current policy” is to bring the increase in the retirement age forward by at least seven years, to 2037
This would mean that about five million people who are aged between 49 and 55 at present would have to work for an additional year before being eligible for their state pension, costing them about £12,500
The decision would save the government about £6 billion a year from 2037 compared with the present timetable
Last year ministers launched a review of the state pension age led by the Government Actuary’s Department and Suzy Morrissey, deputy director of the Pensions Policy Institute. It is due to make recommendations on when the pension age should rise before the government legislates for any change. Ministers have insisted no final decision has been taken
However, in a response to the OBR, the Treasury said the government’s intention was to bring forward the pension age rise towards the end of the next decade
The OBR said: “We assume that the state pension rises to 68 in 2037-39. The Treasury has confirmed to us that this is the government’s current policy position, rather than the legislated increase set in the Pensions Act 2007.”
thetimes.com/article/b747038…
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Millions more people face having to work until they are 68 before being able to claim their pension under plans to bring forward a rise in the state retirement age, @oliver_wright reports
The state pension age is due to gradually rise to 68 between April 2044 and April 2046. It will reach 68 for those born on or after April 6, 1978
However, Treasury officials have told the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government’s fiscal forecaster, that the “current policy” is to bring the increase in the retirement age forward by at least seven years, to 2037
This would mean that about five million people who are aged between 49 and 55 at present would have to work for an additional year before being eligible for their state pension, costing them about £12,500
The decision would save the government about £6 billion a year from 2037 compared with the present timetable
Last year ministers launched a review of the state pension age led by the Government Actuary’s Department and Suzy Morrissey, deputy director of the Pensions Policy Institute. It is due to make recommendations on when the pension age should rise before the government legislates for any change. Ministers have insisted no final decision has been taken
However, in a response to the OBR, the Treasury said the government’s intention was to bring forward the pension age rise towards the end of the next decade
The OBR said: “We assume that the state pension rises to 68 in 2037-39. The Treasury has confirmed to us that this is the government’s current policy position, rather than the legislated increase set in the Pensions Act 2007.”
thetimes.com/article/b747038…
Alistair McQueen retweeted
My Times piece: It is right to worry about Neets, and high youth unemployment and inactivity. But we should not forget about the over-50s, many of whom are also locked out of the job market:
Older workers may be overlooked solution to inactivity crisis
thetimes.com/article/79a8a35…
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Over 70 million pension records are now connected to the pensions dashboards ecosystem representing around 85% of records in scope 🔌
Connections will continue as we head towards to final connection deadline on 31 October 2026.
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Pleased to see our @TheIFS work being highlighted by the Pensions Commissioners in @guardian coverage today.
The research was commissioned by @DWPgovuk to inform the Pensions Commission, and looks at how working lives shape pension saving and outcomes.
theguardian.com/money/2026/m…
NEW: A gender gap in the average pension contributions of men and women opens at the time of the birth of their first child, our new research finds.
The @DWPgovuk report for the Pensions Commission provides new evidence on how labour market life-course trajectories link to pension saving and retirement outcomes:
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Fascinating polling on the triple lock
The higher popularity of a double lock with inflation or 2.5%
Rather than a double lock of earnings or 2.5%
Does not suggest much confidence in our growth prospects
Replying to @YouGov
Net public support for changing the triple lock…
In general (control Q): -11
To a double lock…
Inflation/2.5%: +5
Earnings/inflation: +3
Earnings/2.5%: -5
To a single lock…
Inflation: -13
Earnings: -18
2.5%: -22
Other
Changing the 2.5% to 5%: +22
yougov.com/en-gb/articles/54…
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Q1 2026 G7:
🇬🇧 0.6%
🇺🇸 0.5%
🇨🇦 0.4%
🇩🇪 0.3%
🇮🇹 0.2%
🇫🇷 0%
🇯🇵 (not yet reported but estimates are 0.4%)
Alistair McQueen retweeted
A very strong start to 2026 -significantly above forecasts. GDP/capita rose 0.6% in first three months of 2026 (@OBR_UK expected gdp/capita to grow by 0.8% in 2026 as a whole)
GDP grew 0.6% in Quarter 1 (Jan to Mar) 2026.
Services (+0.8%) construction (+0.4%) and production (+0.2%) all increased.
Read the full article ➡️ ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdome…
🎯Aviva has delivered another quarter of strong trading, building momentum in 2026.
Here are the headlines from our first quarter trading update.
Read more here 👉in.aviva.com/3R9DsjA
#AvivaQ12026 #FinancialUpdate
Alistair McQueen retweeted
HUGE jump in US PPI inflation:
Powered by an eye-popping 1.4% rise in April, nearly triple the 0.5% consensus, the annual rate has hit 6% (crushing the 4.8% consensus forecast).
Core PPI followed suit, surging 1% (vs. 0.3% expected), bringing annual core inflation to 5.2% (consensus was 4.3%).
While the mapping isn't 1:1, these numbers strongly suggest that higher consumer inflation is still coming through the pipeline.
#economy #markets #inflation
Alistair McQueen retweeted
If we go back to this Peter Kellner chart, how should the parties be feeling about these local elections?
Lab = Disappointment
Con = Relief
Lib Dem = Relief
Ref = Disaster
Green = Disappointment
Alistair McQueen retweeted
“Thanks Martin, I found a lost pension from when I was 22, it’s now worth £45,000!” So can you do what Rose did? Martin shows you how to check…
This is just a snip from the full Martin Lewis Money Show Pensions Special watch it on ITVX
Alistair McQueen retweeted
Why society needs to rethink attitudes towards retirement and what actually constitutes a working life - words from me in today’s edition of @TheTimes:
thetimes.com/article/7148248…
Alistair McQueen retweeted
This one is for the niche audience that wants more charts in politicians’ speeches… offered some reflections on the economic lessons of the shock that we sadly find ourselves in for @ucl inaugural Annual Lecture in Economic Policy ucl.ac.uk/policy-lab/news/20…





























