HThompson retweeted
Here is my segment from @HighWireTalk with @delbigtree in which we talk about the dark side of online child safety laws, how they do NOT protect children, they are not intended to help children, and instead create an online digital ID that totally eliminates privacy. thehighwire.com/ark-videos/c…
HThompson retweeted
I’m French. I want to talk to Americans who are about to vote Democrat. Not to insult you. To warn you.
I come from your future.
In France we did everything your progressive politicians promise. Free healthcare, free college, generous welfare, strong unions, heavy regulation, high taxes on the rich, a state that takes care of everything. Public spending close to 57% of GDP, one of the highest on the planet. On paper, it’s the dream.
Here’s what it looks like from the inside. France hasn’t passed a balanced budget since 1974. Our debt is above 3,300 billion euros. Interest on that debt is becoming one of the biggest items in the national budget. Our hospitals are collapsing despite record funding. Our schools rank lower every year. Young people with degrees can’t afford an apartment in the city they were born in. Our best engineers leave for London, Zurich and San Francisco. And the rich you wanted to tax? They left too, and took the jobs with them.
The promise was protection. The result is stagnation.
The worst part is that nobody in France voted for decline. Every single step sounded generous, compassionate, reasonable. One more program. One more regulation. One more tax to fund it. Each step alone makes sense. Fifty years of them, and you wake up in a country that can no longer build a nuclear plant on time or keep its streets safe.
I love America because it’s the one place on earth where people still believe they can build something from nothing. I came to Silicon Valley as a self-taught kid and it changed my life. That spirit is the most precious thing your country has.
Before you vote, ask yourself one question: is the program you’re voting for making America more like America, or more like France?
Trust me. You don’t want to be France.
Je n'ai jamais été aussi optimiste. Pas malgré le chaos actuel, mais grâce à lui.
Je vais vous expliquer pourquoi l'empire du mensonge construit par la gauche depuis cinquante ans va s'effondrer, et pourquoi ce n'est pas une opinion mais une question de physique.
Tout commence avec un mouvement né sur X il y a quelques années : l'effective accelerationism, ou e/acc.
Au départ, c'est une idée presque thermodynamique. L'univers a une tendance de fond : la matière s'organise pour capter et dissiper l'énergie de plus en plus efficacement. Une cellule fait ça. Une forêt fait ça. Une civilisation fait ça. Le marché, la technologie et le capital sont les formes les plus avancées de ce processus. Ce sont des machines à transformer l'énergie en intelligence, en abondance, en complexité.
La thèse e/acc est simple : il ne faut pas freiner cette dynamique, il faut l'embrasser. Plus d'énergie, plus de calcul, plus d'innovation, plus de croissance. Monter sur l'échelle de Kardashev au lieu de s'excuser d'exister. En face, il y a les « décels » : ceux qui veulent ralentir, réguler, taxer, interdire, culpabiliser. Ceux qui voient le progrès comme une menace à contenir plutôt qu'une force à libérer.
Mais il y a une dimension de l'accélération dont presque personne ne parle. L'accélération n'est pas seulement un moteur. C'est un filtre.
Pensez à n'importe quel organisme. Un corps humain en bonne santé peut courir. Il accélère, son cœur pompe plus fort, ses muscles consomment plus d'oxygène, et tout fonctionne parce que le système est bien conçu. Maintenant, prenez un corps malade. Des artères bouchées, un cœur fragile, des organes qui ne communiquent plus entre eux. Faites-le courir. Il ne va pas plus vite vers la santé. Il va plus vite vers l'infarctus.
L'accélération ne corrige pas les défauts d'un système. Elle les amplifie. Un système sain qui accélère devient plus fort. Un système dysfonctionnel qui accélère meurt plus vite.
Et c'est exactement ce qui est en train d'arriver au projet que je vais appeler par son nom : le projet globalo-socialiste. Celui porté par les démocrates américains, par la technostructure de Bruxelles, par les entités supranationales qui n'ont de comptes à rendre à personne, par un réseau d'ONG financées par l'argent public pour dicter la morale aux peuples qui les financent.
Regardez ce que ce projet a produit.
Des États obèses qui prélèvent plus de la moitié de la richesse produite et qui délivrent des services publics de plus en plus dégradés. Des écoles qui n'apprennent plus à lire mais qui apprennent à culpabiliser. Des hôpitaux à bout de souffle malgré des budgets records. Une immigration massive sans aucune exigence d'assimilation, présentée comme une chance par ceux qui n'en subissent jamais les conséquences. Une désindustrialisation organisée au nom d'une écologie punitive qui délocalise la pollution en Chine et l'emploi avec. Des normes, des normes, et encore des normes, jusqu'à ce qu'il devienne plus simple de créer une entreprise à Austin qu'à Lyon. Une justice qui excuse le coupable et soupçonne la victime. Une censure qui avance masquée sous le nom de « lutte contre la désinformation ». Et une jeunesse à qui l'on a expliqué que son pays, son histoire et sa civilisation étaient des crimes à expier.
Ce n'est pas un ensemble de bugs. C'est la conception elle-même.
Maintenant, changeons d'image. Voyez ce système comme un moteur.
Un bon moteur, c'est de la précision. Des pièces qui s'emboîtent, un minimum de frottements, une énergie qui se transforme en mouvement. Le marché libre, la propriété, la responsabilité individuelle, la monnaie saine : c'est ça, un moteur bien conçu. L'information circule par les prix, chaque erreur est sanctionnée, chaque bonne idée est récompensée.
Le moteur socialiste, lui, est mal conçu dès le départ. Il ne tourne pas sur la création de valeur mais sur sa redistribution. Il ne récompense pas la performance, il la taxe. Il ne laisse pas les erreurs mourir, il les subventionne. Résultat : ça frotte partout. Ça chauffe. Ça grince. Chaque pièce use la pièce d'à côté.
Et que font ceux qui pilotent ce moteur ? Au lieu de le reconcevoir, ils changent les pièces. En permanence. Une pièce cède, on en remet une neuve. Encore une. Encore une.
Ces pièces de rechange, vous les connaissez. Elles s'appellent la dette publique et la planche à billets.
La France a dépassé les 3 300 milliards d'euros de dette et n'a pas voté un budget à l'équilibre depuis le milieu des années 70. Les États-Unis ont franchi les 37 000 milliards de dollars. Les banques centrales ont maintenu des taux à zéro pendant des années, imprimé des montants que plus personne ne sait se représenter, et quand l'inflation est arrivée, elles ont fait semblant d'être surprises. Milton Friedman l'avait pourtant dit il y a cinquante ans : l'inflation est toujours et partout un phénomène monétaire.
Chaque crise, on rachète du temps avec de l'argent qui n'existe pas. Chaque problème structurel, on l'arrose de liquidités pour masquer le bruit du moteur. Mais les frottements sont toujours là. Ils s'accumulent. Et la facture des pièces de rechange finit par coûter plus cher que le moteur lui-même : la charge de la dette devient l'un des premiers postes de dépense de l'État français.
Pendant des décennies, ce moteur mal conçu a pu tourner à 3 000 tours par minute. Lentement. Bruyamment. Mais il tournait. Le monde allait assez doucement pour que le bricolage permanent suffise à masquer l'absurdité de la conception.
Et puis l'IA est arrivée.
L'intelligence artificielle, c'est l'accélération la plus brutale de l'histoire humaine. Ce qui prenait des années prend des mois. Ce qui prenait des mois prend des jours. Des entreprises de dix personnes font ce que faisaient des entreprises de mille. Le capital, les talents et les idées se déplacent à la vitesse de la lumière vers les endroits où ils sont bien traités.
L'IA vient de faire passer le moteur de 3 000 à 20 000 tours par minute.
Posez-vous la question qu'un ingénieur se poserait. Que se passe-t-il quand on fait monter à 20 000 tours un moteur mal conçu, rafistolé de partout, qui frotte à chaque rotation ?
Il explose.
Pas parce que quelqu'un l'a saboté. Parce que la physique ne négocie pas.
Et c'est exactement ce que nous voyons en ce moment, sous nos yeux.
L'insécurité qui gagne des villes entières qui étaient paisibles il y a vingt ans. Le conflit de Gaza importé dans nos rues et instrumentalisé par une gauche qui a troqué l'ouvrier contre le clientélisme communautaire. La misère qui revient dans un pays qui a pourtant un des taux de dépense publique les plus élevés au monde. Des classes moyennes qui travaillent et n'arrivent plus à se loger. Une France fracturée, où l'on parle désormais à voix haute de risque de guerre civile.
Ce ne sont pas des accidents. Ce ne sont pas des « crises » successives sans lien entre elles. Ce sont les pièces du moteur qui commencent à voler.
C'est la conséquence logique de cinquante ans de socialisme international : un système qui a détruit la responsabilité, la frontière, la monnaie, l'école et la fierté, et qui découvre qu'à haute vitesse, tout ce qui a été détruit ne peut plus être compensé par une ligne de dette supplémentaire.
Et c'est là que je deviens profondément optimiste.
Parce qu'une fois qu'on a compris ça, on comprend aussi que leur projet a une date de fin. Pas une date politique. Une date physique. Un système qui consomme plus qu'il ne produit, qui punit ceux qui créent et récompense ceux qui détruisent, qui finance son présent en hypothéquant l'avenir de ses enfants, ne peut pas durer indéfiniment. Il n'est pas soutenable par construction. L'IA ne fait qu'avancer l'échéance.
Le mensonge a besoin de lenteur pour survivre. Il a besoin que les conséquences arrivent assez tard pour qu'on puisse accuser quelqu'un d'autre. Dans un monde à 20 000 tours, les conséquences arrivent immédiatement. Le mensonge n'a plus le temps de se cacher.
Alors, que faire quand le moteur explose ? On en construit un nouveau. Et cette fois, on le conçoit correctement.
Écoutez Elon Musk. Un homme qui a reconstruit l'industrie spatiale, la voiture électrique et l'infrastructure satellite en partant d'un principe simple : revenir aux premiers principes. Ne pas demander « comment on a toujours fait », mais « qu'est-ce qui est physiquement vrai ». C'est exactement ce dont nos États ont besoin : arrêter de rafistoler et repartir de la base.
Écoutez Javier Milei. Un homme dont tout le monde se moquait, arrivé à la tête d'un pays ravagé par un siècle de péronisme, et qui a pris la tronçonneuse au sens propre. Ministères supprimés, dépenses coupées, inflation écrasée, excédent budgétaire retrouvé. Il a prouvé une chose que la gauche jurait impossible : on peut démonter le moteur socialiste et le peuple peut le soutenir.
Écoutez Milton Friedman. Relisez-le. Tout était déjà là. La monnaie, la liberté de choisir, la responsabilité, les effets pervers de l'intervention publique. Il disait que si l'on confiait le Sahara au gouvernement fédéral, il y aurait pénurie de sable en cinq ans. On a ri. On a confié le sable. On a eu la pénurie.
Revenez à une hiérarchie et au respect du beau. Une civilisation ne tient pas que sur des chiffres. Elle tient sur l'idée qu'il existe des choses supérieures à d'autres. Que l'excellence vaut mieux que la médiocrité. Que le mérite compte. Qu'une cathédrale est plus belle qu'un parking. Que transmettre est un devoir et pas une oppression. Le relativisme a été l'arme culturelle de ce projet. Le retour du beau, du vrai et de l'exigence en sera l'antidote.
Et enfin, faites le Nuremberg du communisme. Le nazisme a été jugé, documenté, enseigné, et il est devenu moralement indéfendable. Le communisme, avec ses dizaines de millions de morts, ses goulags, ses famines organisées et ses peuples réduits en esclavage, n'a jamais eu ce procès. On peut encore porter un t-shirt du Che dans une université sans que personne ne cille. Tant que ce procès historique et moral n'aura pas eu lieu, l'idéologie continuera de muter et de revenir sous de nouveaux noms. Il faut nommer les crimes, les enseigner, honorer les victimes, et rendre cette idéologie aussi infréquentable que celle qu'elle prétendait combattre.
Le monde qui vient sera plus rapide, plus exigeant et plus impitoyable avec les systèmes mal conçus. C'est une terrible nouvelle pour ceux qui ont vécu du mensonge.
Et c'est la meilleure nouvelle de notre génération pour tous ceux qui veulent construire.
Le moteur va exploser. À nous de dessiner le suivant.
HThompson retweeted
@StewGlobal — globalnews.ca/news/11954348/… Canada’s immigration enforcement department is alleging a Justin Trudeau and Liberal Party donor, the Chinese community leader in Vancouver known as “Tiger” Yuan, is a PLA war criminal who lied his way into the country.
HThompson retweeted
We're paying too much taxes to the wrong government.
For illustration purposes, the average Alberta family has a total income of $172,000 (Fraser Institutes, 2025).
Total tax bill: $65,000 (income taxes, GST, property taxes, payroll contributions like CPP & EI, fuel/excise taxes, etc.)
How are those taxes distributed?
Federal: $43,400 (~67%)
Provincial: $17,000 (~26%)
Municipal: $4,200 (–7%)
Note: Municipal is mostly property tax; the education portion of your property tax bill goes to the province. GST and most of CPP/EI land in the federal column. Numbers are rounded for clarity and are not precise for any individual household.
So the government that picks up your garbage, keeps your water running, maintains your roads, and shows up when your house is on fire gets about 7% of the average Alberta household’s total tax bill.
On the other side, the one that decides how much of your money goes to other countries, how the equalization formula works, and what the national carbon policy looks like, gets roughly two-thirds.
That’s not a rounding error. That’s the system working exactly as designed.
Your local council has to balance its budget every year and answer for potholes and snow removal. Ottawa can run deficits for decades and still tell Alberta it’s “not paying its fair share” while collecting the largest slice of the pie. The province sits in the middle, running health care and education while also collecting education property tax on top of income tax.
It’s backwards. The decisions that hit your driveway tomorrow are funded by the smallest share of you money. The decisions that hit your paycheque for the rest of your life are funded by the largest share, and those decisions are made the farthest away.
An independent Alberta wouldn’t magically make every problem disappear. But it would at least put the biggest tax bill and the biggest decisions in the same place... closer to the people who actually live with the results.
An independent Alberta is the only path forward.
HThompson retweeted
Watch and Share the video... Everyone needs to know before we waste more billions of $...
More government insiders, Consultants... Same Liberal Spending Spree!!!🤦♂️
Let's call this out and SOUND THE ALARM? 🚨
Did they learn anything from ArriveCan?
youtu.be/1KZjt2GciWQ?si=5IE_…
HThompson retweeted
Another good article on the NASEM/climate science scandal. Worse than climategate.
thefirebreak.org/p/a-downfal…
Petition for disclosure on Carney’s EU “associate membership” it’s utter bullocks
Canadians deserve a say in any decision that could fundamentally change our relationship with the European Union. I’m pleased to sponsor e-Petition 7823, which calls for the full terms of any proposed EU associate membership to be made public and for Canadians to have the final say in a national referendum.
SIGN & SHARE to help put Canada’s EU future in the hands of Canadians: ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/P…
HThompson retweeted
OUTRAGEOUS costs are proposed for Calgary ‼️
Water bills will go from $119.21/m to $206.94/m by 2030 = 74% increase.
It will add an extra $1k a year to bills in Calgary, further eroding affordability on top of the insane property tax increases.
Complete mismanagement.
#yyccc
HThompson retweeted
Child Sex Offender Who Met Carney In Federal Liberal Campaign Also Appeared In Ontario Liberal Campaign Marred by Irregularities Allegations —Ontario Soccer Finds Liberal Candidate Breached Child Safeguarding Code thebureau.news/p/child-sex-o…
HThompson retweeted
“Who is the economy working for?”
This article about Brookfield deserves serious attention. The company has extensive interests in Canada’s infrastructure, energy and real estate. Mark Carney formerly held a senior role there, and Canadians are entitled to more than vague assurances about how potential conflicts are being managed.
But are we missing the bigger picture by talking only about Carney’s personal conflict of interest?
Who owns and controls the infrastructure Canadians depend on? How is public money being used, who stands to benefit, and what does this mean for Canada’s long-term economic security?
Those questions deserve clear answers. Public trust depends on Canadians being able to see the decisions, the financial interests and the safeguards for themselves.
If public money is being used to support private investment, the government should be able to show exactly who benefits and why it serves the public interest. Asking those questions is basic accountability.
Read the article and make up your own mind.
HThompson retweeted
💥BOMBSHELL: European Parliament confirms a COVID vaccine lottery—and some got the kill shot.
In a shocking admission that validates what millions suspected, the European Parliament confirmed the COVID vaccine rollout was a calculated experiment with human lives. Not everyone received the same formula—some got a low-concentration mRNA dose while others received what whistleblowers are calling "the kill shot"—a lethal amount designed to eliminate rather than protect.
But the deception runs even deeper —a troubling procedural order keeps both the public and even doctors from being fully informed. There are two sets of adverse data: one the pharmaceutical companies keep hidden, and one carefully curated for public consumption.
Perhaps the most damning: According to Marcel de Graaff of the FVD MEP, the EMA—Health Canada's equivalent—knew the mRNA vaccines neither treat nor stop transmission of COVID-19. Even worse, they concealed evidence that vaccinated people were MORE likely to contract the virus.
This isn't just a medical scandal—it's a crime against humanity.
HThompson retweeted
NEW REPORTS: Here’s the number that should get the attention of every Alberta family:
$4,390–$6,350 per Albertan.
That is the annual fiscal room our new report estimates could remain after Alberta funds the services people receive today AND assumes the additional responsibilities of an independent country.
For a family of four, the scale is roughly $17,500–$25,400 in annual fiscal capacity.
That does NOT mean every family gets a cheque.
It means future Albertans could have some very significant choices about taxes, debt, savings and public services.
Read the numbers for yourself:
albertatransitioncouncil.com…
HThompson retweeted
My Baseline: Carney is gaslighting you.
But taking his tail risk claim at face value, and not a political ploy — post Greenland deal, going through the logic below (tiresome as it is)
Prior from the “extreme tail” language
Carney described U.S.-ordered military action as an extreme tail event worth examining in detail, not the expected path. In risk-management usage this typically means a low-probability, high-impact scenario that people systematically underweight—on the order of 1-in-50 to 1-in-200 over a relevant horizon rather than a 10–20% “plausible” risk. Trump had already called military force against Canada “highly unlikely” and ruled it out as a tool for annexation while leaving economic coercion on the table. Expert commentary contemporaneous with the planning described the prospect as “extremely unlikely” or “unimaginable,” even while Canadian forces modeled a conventional overrun. Public polls were far higher (tens of percent “somewhat likely”), but those are not the model Carney invoked. theglobeandmail.com
A defensible prior for the remaining ~2.3 years of the term is therefore P(A) ≈ 1% (range 0.5–2%), where A is U.S. military action against Canada.
This treats the rhetoric and modeling as raising the tail above historical near-zero while remaining consistent with “extreme” and “not base case.”
Why the Greenland deal updates the probability
The September 2026 agreement gives the United States permanent expanded basing, overflight, and access rights in Greenland, explicitly bars non-NATO (Russia/China) military presence and sensitive investment without U.S. approval, and authorizes Golden Dome components.
It frames Greenland as part of the strategic defense of North America. This is the same Arctic/polar-approach geography that NORAD already covers and that Golden Dome is intended to protect; Canada sits geographically between the continental United States and Greenland on those routes. reuters.com
The deal is informative for three reasons:
• Revealed preference. Trump had used more explicit force language on Greenland than on Canada.
He settled for enhanced security control plus an adversary-exclusion regime rather than annexation. That pattern is more consistent with a security-and-leverage actor than with an actor prepared to use the U.S. military against a NATO/NORAD partner.
• Strategic complementarity. An attack on Canada would immediately degrade the very North American/Arctic defense architecture (NORAD modernization, polar missile warning and intercept, Golden Dome) that the Greenland deal is meant to strengthen against Russia and China. The two policies are substitutes under an expansionist reading and complements under a homeland-defense reading.
• Cost of inconsistency. The United States is now committing additional infrastructure and political capital in Greenland. Kinetic action against Canada would isolate Washington from NATO, destroy the binational command, and make the new Arctic posture far harder to operate.
HThompson retweeted
Racketeering Expose by Derrick Sweet
Sept 20\26
My name is Derrick Sweet. I am a 61 year old Canadian and earn my living as a stock market analyst. I follow money for a living. I began my career in investing in 1993 at Midland Walwyn in Toronto as a Financial Advisor. After establishing myself as a successful advisor I was recruited by BMO Nesbitt Burns in 1997 and offered the position of Vice President and Senior Investment Advisor and presented with a $250,000.00 signing bonus, which was a lot of money back then. For several years I was one of the top advisors in Canada and a regular invited speaker at investment conferences across Canada. By 2002 I had sold my business to a bank and some time after that I started offering stock research reports to DIY investors who manage their own money. I provide this background on who I am so you have a better understanding how I discovered possible acts of racketeering.
I have been closely following Mark Carney’s violations of the trust he was voted to uphold for too long. I am not a lawyer and am not making any former charges against Mark Carney in this post. I am simply pointing out activities by the PM of Canada that are a direct conflict of interest that could possibly lead to several charges of racketeering.
The Prosecution Case Against Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada (the PM)
I. The Core Allegation: "Pay-to-Play" Infrastructure
The prosecution will argue that the Prime Minister (PM) has operated a criminal enterprise where public policy and taxpayer-funded contracts were used as a vehicle to inflate the value of a private entity (Brookfield) in which he holds a direct pecuniary interest (stock options).
The Nexus: The Acts: 42 distinct government deals awarded to or partnered with Brookfield.
The Benefit: $5 billion in reported profits for the entity.
The Conflict: Multi-million dollar stock options held by the decision-maker (the PM).
II. Count 1: Breach of Trust (Criminal Code s. 122)
Under Section 122, we do not need to prove a "bribe" was paid. We only need to prove that the PM, in connection with his duties, committed a Breach of Trust that would be an offence even if committed against a private person.
The Evidence:
Duty of Office: The PM is mandated by the Conflict of Interest Act to "arrange private affairs to prevent conflicts of interest" (s. 5).
The Breach: By failing to divest or recuse himself from a policy environment that directly benefits a company where he holds options, he has fundamentally violated the trust of the Canadian public.
Legal Standard: Per R. v. Boulanger, the prosecution must show the act was a "marked departure from the standards expected of an individual in the accused's position." Managing 42 deals while holding the stock is a "marked departure" by any reasonable standard.
III. Count 2: Frauds on the Government (Criminal Code s. 121)
This is the Canadian version of "racketeering." Specifically, Section 121(1)(c) prohibits an official from demanding or accepting a benefit for themselves in exchange for "assistance" or "exercise of influence" regarding government dealings.
The Strategy:
We will argue that the Stock Options constitute an "advantage or benefit." The value of these options is tied directly to the success of the 42 government-backed deals. Every time the PM announces a deal, he effectively "cuts himself a check" by driving up the equity value of the firm.
IV. Count 3: Organized Corruption (The "Racketeering" Element)
To push this into the realm of organized crime/racketeering, we look at the Enterprise (the Liberal Party/PMO) and the Pattern of Activity.
The Enterprise: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO).
The Pattern: A series of 42 separate transactions. In racketeering law, we look for "Continuity and Relationship."
Relationship: All deals involve the same beneficiary (Brookfield).
Continuity: The deals spanned a significant period of time and continue as long as the PM holds office.
V. The "Smoking Gun": Intent (Mens Rea)
The defense will claim the PM has a "Blind Trust." I have dismantled this below:
Transparency vs. Blinding: If the PM knows he has the options (which is public knowledge), the trust is not "blind."
The $5 Billion Profit Announcement: We will present evidence that the PM was aware of the financial health of the company while simultaneously crafting legislation (like the CLARITY Act or housing initiatives) that specifically favors Brookfield’s asset classes.
This is not a series of unfortunate coincidences. This is a closed-loop system of enrichment. The Prime Minister is using the sovereign authority of Canada as a marketing arm for a private corporation. He is both the 'Grantor' of the contracts and the 'Grantee' of the profits. In the private sector, this is insider trading. in the public sector, this is a Racket."
CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Draft Criminal Referral – s. 121 & s. 122 Criminal Code (Canada)
TARGET: The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada
NEXUS: Financial Entanglements with Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)
DATE: February 13, 2026
I. PREAMBLE & JURISDICTION
This referral outlines a prima facie case for investigation by the RCMP Sensitive and International Investigations Unit. The allegations concern a systematic pattern of conduct wherein the subject, in his capacity as Prime Minister, has influenced or directed federal policy and contracts toward Brookfield Corporation (and its subsidiaries) while maintaining a multi-million dollar personal financial stake in said corporation via unexercised stock options and carried interest.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Direct Interest: As of February 12, 2026, the subject remains the holder of approximately $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options (calculated at market value), with expiration dates extending into 2033/2034.
The "Profit Nexus": On February 12, 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported annual distributable earnings of $5.4 billion USD, an 11% increase. This profit spike coincided with a series of 42 federal "deals" or policy partnerships announced during the subject’s tenure.
Conflict of Interest Screen Failure: Testimony provided to the House Ethics Committee in late 2025 confirmed that 95% of Brookfield-owned companies (approximately 1,900 entities) are not covered by the subject’s current "ethics screen," allowing for direct interaction between the PMO and entities that contribute to the subject’s future performance pay.
Policy Correlation: Specific federal initiatives—including the $3B auto sector save-out and the AI Infrastructure Fund—directly align with Brookfield’s core 2026 investment strategies (AI infrastructure and energy transition).
III. APPLICABLE OFFENCES (CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA)
COUNT 1: Breach of Trust by Public Officer (s. 122)
The Theory: The subject has exercised the powers of the Prime Minister’s Office for a purpose other than the public good—specifically, the appreciation of his private equity holdings.
Evidence: The subject’s refusal to divest (liquidate) his assets, despite public warnings from the Ethics Commissioner and the Clerk of the Privy Council that a "blind trust" is insufficient for assets as large and specific as Brookfield carried interest.
COUNT 2: Frauds on the Government (s. 121(1)(c))
The Theory: The subject, being an official, has "accepted or agreed to accept" an advantage (the appreciation of stock options and carried interest) from a person/entity (Brookfield) that has active and ongoing dealings with the Government of Canada.
Evidence: The "carried interest" held by the subject is a direct performance-based payout. Every federal contract awarded to a Brookfield-managed fund (e.g., the Global Transition Fund) serves as an indirect "commission" or "reward" to the subject.
IV. INVESTIGATIVE ROADMAP
To move from "referral" to "indictment," the following evidence must be secured via production orders:
Internal PMO Communications: All emails between the PMO and Bruce Flatt/Justin Beber (Brookfield executives) regarding the 42 specific deals.
Blind Trust "Bypass" Logs: Records of "recusal failures" where the subject was present for decisions impacting Brookfield subsidiaries not covered by the s. 1,900-company screen.
Option Exercise Strategy: Correspondence between the subject’s trustee and Brookfield regarding the optimal "cashing out" window relative to government policy announcements.
V. CONCLUSION
The legal threshold for a Section 122 investigation is a "marked departure" from the standard of trust. The simultaneous management of the Canadian economy and the holding of a performance-based stake in a company receiving 40+ federal deals meets this threshold.
I have broken down the 42 Critical Deals and Policy Alignments between the Canadian Federal Government and the Brookfield ecosystem as of early 2026.
In a racketeering case, we don't just look for "contracts"; we look for "The Pattern." These deals are categorized by how they directly feed the valuation of the PM’s private equity holdings.
The "Brookfield 42" Portfolio Analysis
Category A: The Infrastructure & Housing "Mega-Deals" (14 Deals)
These deals leverage the 2025/2026 federal budget initiatives to de-risk Brookfield's massive real estate and modular construction divisions.
The Build Canada Homes Initiative: A $36 Billion federal program. Our investigation shows Brookfield-owned modular housing firms received the lion's share of "fast-track" status.
Canada Growth Fund (CGF) Backstopping: 4 specific "Carbon Capture" deals where the federal CGF provides "price certainty" for Brookfield’s decarbonization projects, effectively guaranteeing their 15-20% IRR (Internal Rate of Return).
The BGIS Master Contract Extension: Brookfield Global Integrated Services (BGIS) continues to manage 3,800+ federal buildings. Even though Brookfield sold its majority stake, it retains a "carried interest" in the performance of the legacy contracts.
Category B: The "Green Transition" Payouts (18 Deals)
This is the most egregious category for a racketeering charge because the PM personally co-headed these funds before taking office.
The Global Transition Fund (GTF) Infusion: Federal pension oversight boards (under PM influence) have directed over $12 Billion into the GTF.
Wind West & Nova Scotia Offshore: 6 deals where federal "nod" and subsidies were given to offshore wind projects where Brookfield is the lead equity partner.
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): 2 deals for the Darlington SMR project. Brookfield’s acquisition of Westinghouse (nuclear tech) makes them the primary beneficiary of this federal nuclear push.
Category C: The "Digital Sovereignty" & AI Build-out (10 Deals)
A new 2026 frontier. Brookfield recently launched a $100 Billion AI Infrastructure program.
Sovereign Data Centres: 3 contracts awarded to Brookfield subsidiaries to build "Sovereign AI" data centres in Quebec and Ontario.
The "Microsoft Framework" Tailwinds: While the deal is between Microsoft and Brookfield, federal tax credits for "Clean Energy for AI" (passed in the 2025 budget) effectively subsidized $10.5 Gigawatts of Brookfield-owned power facilities.
Prosecutorial Conclusion on the 42 Deals
If we were in court today, I would argue that these are not 42 separate coincidences, but 42 bricks in a wall of private enrichment. The fact that 95% of Brookfield’s 1,900 subsidiaries are not screened means the PM can sit in a meeting about "Critical Mineral Supply Chains" (a Category C deal) and make a decision that enriches a Brookfield subsidiary he technically doesn't "know" he owns—yet his stock options move upward regardless.
Attorney's Note: The $5.4 Billion profit reported yesterday is the "fruit of the poisonous tree." We would argue those profits were only possible because of the de-risking provided by the Canadian taxpayer through these 42 deals.
If you believe I have presented proof of racketeering please do the following;
1) Share immediately on your time time - change your privacy settings to public for this post.
2) Share it with a conservative alternative media organization and your local MP.
3) Follow up with your MP and demand an investigation by law enforcement.
4) Remember, no one is above the law, not even Mark Carney.
HThompson retweeted
Google Just Told Canadian Adults: GIVE US YOUR ID AND A SELFIE OR ELSE…And It’s STARTING NOW!!
Google is rolling out age verification in Canada right NOW!
Not next year, it’s not “under review”, it’s happening now.
Jeanette Patell of Google Canada just announced age assurance as part of “online safety for Canadian families.”
Google will use machine learning on data it already has: your searches, YouTube watch history, and years of patterns tied to your account.
Then it guesses if you’re over or under 18.
When the machine is conveniently wrong it will brand a grown adult as a minor.
The “fix” is to hand over a government ID or take a selfie.
If you refuse, they will treat you like a child: bedtime nags on YouTube, throttled viewing, blocked adult-restricted apps on Google Play, and more restrictions inside the services they already built on your data.
This is Big Brother watching you and forcing you to prove who you are when their “guess” is conveniently wrong.
Do NOT comply.
Do NOT upload the ID.
Do NOT give them the selfie.
Opt out of biometrics every time and starve the system before it’s too late!
Please SHARE THIS VIDEO FAR AND WIDE because nothing will ever change until there’s enough people who know there’s a problem in the first place!
HThompson retweeted
IT’S HAPPENING:
The Culling the Cure documentary about Canada’s ostrich farm slaughter starts screening this weekend!
We will never forget. 🇨🇦
Grab your tickets: rebelnews.com/ostrich_docume…
HThompson retweeted
We need to think very carefully here
They will be seeking to challenge a piece of legislation I’m quite fond of
The Investment Canada Act
MUST READ: Beijing is courting Canada’s First Nations for investment and deeper ties, despite intelligence warnings that China has targeted these Indigenous communities for influence.
junonews.com/p/chinese-diplo…
