
Anthropologist. PI Human Systems and Behavior Lab. Co-Director of the Omo Valley Research Project @theOVRP
Nyangatom, Ethiopia
Joined August 2018
- Tweets2.1K
- Following540
- Followers4.1K
- Likes13.9K
Luke Glowacki retweeted
For Halloween, article by @evornithology.... popsci.com/science/vampire-b…
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Honey bees inject venom with a two-stroke stinger.
Learn more: scim.ag/4yXrVF5 @NewsfromScience
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Big news! Our new book, "Making the Modern Laboratory," is now available for pre-order. It is a stunning, 504-page hardcover book that explains how the research laboratory, and everything in it, came to be.
Did you know that the modern micropipette was invented by a German postdoc so frustrated with mouth pipetting that he ditched his lab for two days until could return with a prototype?
Or that an 18th-century scientist sewed tiny taffeta pants for male frogs to determine whether or not semen was essential for fertilization?
These stories and hundreds more are told in the book, which has a hard cloth cover and is printed in full color on Arena Natural Rough, a textured, uncoated paper made by Fedrigoni. The book is also finished with colored endpapers, thread-sewn binding, and a squared spine. It is priced at $49 and worth every penny.
Learn more and order: press.asimov.com/articles/mo…
Luke Glowacki retweeted
This spring, I'm traveling to Botswana, Zimbabwe, and Colombia, where I'll be interviewing shamans about the phenomenology of trance dances. I'm looking for folks (i.e. QRI-type people) to advise me on building a good and extremely user-friendly tool that the shamans can use to visualize their sensations.
Grateful to anyone who can link me with the right person, boost this to others, or (esp!) is down to chat more and advise! Please reply or DM if you have good leads 🙂.
@algekalipso @johnsonmxe @chris_percy @ekkolapto @cube_flipper @VisionSymmetric @AnalogWhole @theIACS @QualiaRI @42irrationalist @Josikinz
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Military alliances - across all world regions - repeatedly crumbled because of men's sexual rivalry & assaults.
My latest essay includes stories from the Torah, the Mahabharata, Rome, the Mongol Īlkhānate, & the Mughal Empire
ggd.world/p/rape-and-revenge…
Luke Glowacki retweeted
What an amazing symposium on intergroup cooperation at Harvard! Many thanks to Martin Surbeck for bringing together such a fantastic group of researchers to explore commonalities across study systems and advance our understanding of this timely topic
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Mitochondria are alive.
They carry their own genomes and express their own genes within their lumens, an internal pocket of watery space, using biomolecules distinct from the cell’s nucleus. Mitochondria also replicate and divide through binary fission, much like bacteria. If one considers bacteria as living entities — and all biologists seem to — then it is impossible to explain why mitochondria are not.
From a thermodynamic perspective, mitochondria take in low-entropy inputs from their host cell, such as glucose or fatty acids, and expel high-entropy outputs, including carbon dioxide and water. Mitochondria also pump out protons through their inner membrane to maintain an out-of-equilibrium thermodynamic balance, using the resulting gradient to produce the ATP molecules that fuel cellular functions, from DNA replication to protein synthesis.
From the molecular biologist’s perspective, a mitochondrion’s role is not limited to simple energy generation, either. Mitochondria also process information and interact with their environment, much like a human cell. They monitor steroid hormones, oxidative stress, heat, ATP levels, secondary metabolites, and many more molecules floating through their environment, the cell’s cytoplasm. Mitochondria then use this information to precisely control cellular functions. For example, when a virus invades a cell, the mitochondria are critical in sensing the intrusion and signaling a host cell to undergo programmed cell death to halt its spread.
And finally, mitochondria grow and reproduce in a manner distinct from the host’s replication process. Mitochondria independently copy their circular genomes, known as mitochondrial DNA, and divide through binary fission. Notably, mitochondrial replication has several distinct properties from those observed during human cellular replication. Mitochondrial DNA mutates 100-1,000 times faster than the human genome and these mutations can significantly alter a mitochondrion’s fitness, thereby changing the fitness of its host cell. Mitochondria are thus agents of — and subject to — the forces of evolution.
Despite all this evidence, the main case made against mitochondria being alive is that they do not perform all of these functions independently, as they must be embedded within the cytoplasm of a host cell to function. However, such an argument is logically inconsistent because, by this same logic, most organisms on Earth would not be considered “living.” After all, nothing in biology lives in isolation from its environment.
Read the full essay by Liyam Chitayat: asimov.press/p/mitochondria
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Last chance to submit your poster and data blitz! Deadline is tonight.
The Historical Psychology Preconference is coming to Philly for #SPSP2027 ! Please join us on February 11th, 2027 for this year’s theme: How the Events of Yesterday Shaped the Minds of Today.
Luke Glowacki retweeted
"How do single-celled algae swim toward light sources" is the kind of project that gets DOGE'd—how does this help Americans?
20 years later, the underlying protein is a central tool in human neuroscience.
We're a rich country, we should be funding way more basic science.
Luke Glowacki retweeted
I'd love to see an analysis like this with a simple figure for every major policy debate.
Many policies that might *sound* good, are actually designed to benefit a small number of people and backfire for the rest of society.
Luke Glowacki retweeted
We put together a list of 25+ stories we'd like to publish. Take a look and please pitch us! Our email is editors@asimov.com.
We pay $1+ for reported features, and $1200 for shorter essays. We're after extremely deep, mechanistic writing about big ideas in biotechnology.
Luke Glowacki retweeted
To rev men up for war, militaries developed rituals that amped up fraternal solidarity & perceived invincibility.
@HSB_Lab has detailed this among small-scale societies, e.g. Lakota participants in the Ghost Dance wore ‘spirit shirts’ believed to be bulletproof cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Parallels in large empires too: talismanic shirts were worn by Islamic generals, covered in Quranic surahs. This one is from 15/16 C. metmuseum.org/art/collection…
Luke Glowacki retweeted
For my first piece in @sciam I wrote about a plan to terraform Mars with microbes! As with raising kids, it takes a village, as they say. @Pioneer__Labs has devised one microbe so far but making Mars habitable will require an ecosystem to support life: scientificamerican.com/artic…
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Biology is breathtaking. Biotechnology is magic—except it works and we understand why.
I think biotechnology is the most exciting thing you can work on. But I have never written down my reasons for thinking this explicitly, so here are some bulleted arguments:
- It is incredibly broad across both space and time.
Biology spans every possible scale, from atoms to organisms to the planet. Biochemical reactions happen at nanosecond timescales, whereas organisms evolve over hours (in some cases) or millennia. This breadth means that there is always something new to discover. I believe it's possible for any undergraduate student, with a little bit of guidance, to make an original discovery in a matter of weeks. It may not be an important discovery, but you can quickly find things that nobody else has ever found before.
- Insights gained into one organism apply to many others.
It is a miracle that we can engineer living organisms at all. How peculiar that a bacterial defense system (CRISPR-Cas) can be adapted into a gene-editing tool which works not only in bacteria, but also in plants and algae and humans. All life shares a common ancestor, and is assembled from a common set of ingredients, so we can mix-and-match our tools to solve incredibly diverse problems. (If life formed multiple times, and each "tree" of life persisted to the present, then the tools made for one branch of that tree would be unlikely to work in another. Fortunately, this is not the case.)
- A deep understanding of biology can be applied to a *huge* range of problems.
Say you're a protein designer, using computers to design new types of molecules. Such a skill is not only useful for making medicines! It can also be used to make antivenoms, or to design peptides that protect plants against pests, or a million other things. This means that, as a biotechnologist, you can work on medicines or climate change or agriculture or making life multiplanetary ... all using a common set of skills.
It is just unfortunate that biology is taught in such a boring way in schools, with textbooks and rote memorization. My advice would be to fight through your boredom and then join a research laboratory, as soon as you possibly can. Get hands-on skills and try to work on your own problems.
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Why are some societies matrilocal, sending sons out to marry women in other villages?
One idea is that it strengthens military cooperation, as male relatives unite against shared foes
But if matrilocality consolidated warrior fraternities, what did this mean for women?
ggd.world/p/what-explains-ma…
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Some of the greatest biological theories of all time predicted not only the existence of a "thing" -- like an ion channel -- but how *entire* biological mechanisms worked. They did so, in some cases, before any direct experimental evidence supported the ideas.
Two of these theories, the chemiosmotic theory and the clonal selection theory of adaptive immunity, correctly predicted how cells generate energy to power themselves and how the body mounts a defense against pathogens, respectively, before any pre-existing analogs were known.
How did these "great leaps" in imagination come about? In our latest @AsimovPress article, the talented @ulkar_aghayeva tells their story.
Chemiosmotic theory traces back to Peter Mitchell, a British biochemist who formulated his ideas without “a shred of experimental evidence.” Mitchell was directly inspired by the pre-Socratic philosopher, Heraclitus of Ephesus, who wrote about flux and change and directly informed how Mitchell thought about ions moving through a membrane.
The clonal selection theory stems from Niels Jerne, who attributed his great leap in imagination to (oddly enough) the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard. In a 1966 paper, Jerne explained how he began thinking about antibody formation, writing:
"Can the truth (the capability to synthesize an antibody) be learned? If so, it must be assumed not to pre-exist; to be learned, it must be acquired. We are thus confronted with the difficulty to which Socrates calls attention in Meno (Socrates, 375 B.C.), namely that it makes as little sense to search for what one does not know as to search for what one knows; what one knows one cannot search for, since one knows it already, and what one does not know one cannot search for, since one does not even know what to search for. Socrates resolved this difficulty by postulating that learning is nothing but recollection. The truth (the capability to synthesize an antibody) cannot be brought in, but was already inherent."
The article is interesting throughout. It's inspiring to study how scientists made their big discoveries, even in the face of *extreme* resistance. (Mitchell, for instance, left academia in 1963 and set up his own research organization to continue his work. He won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1978, vindicated.)
press.asimov.com/articles/gr…
Luke Glowacki retweeted
Postdoctoral Associate Position in Biosocial Science in the Human Nature Lab!
We have a cutting edge research agenda in human social chemosignaling.
Scientists with an interest in olfaction and AI or with experience in GC/MS or animal chemosignaling are especially encouraged.
Please repost.
academicjobsonline.org/ajo/j…






























