During our session, someone from the audience asked us if it was “antisemitic” to oppose foreign aid to Israel. Both @SteveDeaceShow and I said “no, it was not.” That is a policy issue. Both of us wanted to see our foreign aid to all other countries to go down to zero, and that would include Israel. Within the conservative movement, it should be possible to come to a conference held by @TPUSA, and to hear some speakers argue for zeroing out all foreign aid, and other speakers advocate for a judicious use of strategic foreign aid, with America’s best interests being the reason for the aid. Great. Have that debate. Make sure both sides are represented. Talk about policy. Is Israel our greatest ally? Let us debate the question! Let us knock ourselves out. Nobody is an antisemite for thinking that some other country is our greatest ally. But there is another question, another kind of question, that does not belong at a conference like this at all. That is the question of whether or not the organizers of the conference you are going to were complicit in the grotesque murder of their founder and friend. That is an allegation that is gobsmackingly off-the-leash, with the holder of the leash being off her meds. If someone thinks that is a reasonable question, and he gets an invitation to speak at TPUSA (for some reason), and he accepts that invitation, it really means that he doesn’t believe it is a reasonable question at all, and is just being a hypocritical opportunist. Going to the conference to chum around with the murderers? Here is where the Great Smudge is happening. This is where the disingenuous juke move is being performed. A grotesque libel and slander is hurled at the leadership of TPUSA, with preparations being made to be insulted and affronted if they decided not to invite you next time. If they don’t invite you next time, it will be plain indication that they “don’t want to face the music.” They are trying to censor “questions”! No, it would actually be a plain indication that free speech has performed one of its central functions, which is to identify who the morons are. And in this case, who the impudent morons are. @RealCandaceO is not just “asking questions.” She is making very serious allegations. She is an accuser. She is an accuser of persons. She is the perverse spirit that the Lord has poured into the bowl. She is the great bringer of what might be called inviso-receipts. She has a vast army of people following her who are demanding the dopamine rush they get whenever she feeds them the next crazy line. That is why the moratorium that Erika and Candace agreed on couldn’t hold—it was like arranging a cease-fire with Hamas. Candace has a ravenous bear for an audience, and she has to feed it tainted meat, with that meat getting increasingly tainted. This is why we are moving into territory formerly occupied by those people who needed to read the tabloid headlines about Madonna and Sasquatch having a love child. It is disingenuous, in extremis, to pretend that these questions are anything alike.