Amazing work. Brian Cole Jr. must be freed at once and all charges dropped!!! @FreeBrianCole

Important! Something very interesting is happening to independent journalism right now and I think we need to start paying attention to the pattern. For years, one of the easiest ways to destroy an independent journalist's reputation was to call them a “Russian agent,” a “Russian puppet,” or some variation of the same accusation. It was an incredibly effective weapon because, for a long time, the mere association with Russia was enough to make large parts of the audience stop listening. The label did the work. You didn't have to disprove the journalist's reporting. You didn't have to challenge their evidence. You just had to make people afraid of who they supposedly were and that was enough. But something changed. Audiences changed. People became much more skeptical of the institutions that once told them what they were supposed to believe. Especially on Russia! They started looking at primary sources, comparing narratives, supporting independent journalists directly and most importantly, thinking for themselves. The old “Russian puppet” accusation simply doesn't have the same power it once did. In some circles, it can even have the opposite effect and make people more curious about the person being attacked. So what do you do when attacking an independent journalist from the outside doesn't work anymore? You attack them from the inside from another so called ‘’independent creator’’. And this is the part I think people need to understand. If you want to destroy the credibility of an independent journalist, you don’t need to convince their opponents that the journalist is bad. Their opponents already aren’t listening to them. Ben Shapiro’s audience, for example, is not Candace Owens’ audience. The real objective is to convince the journalist’s own audience to stop trusting them, to turn their supporters against them. That is the core of the deep states new spy-op. From what I’m observing here is that the propaganda machine the Epstein-class media - has a new strategy: identify the audience, understand what that audience values most, figure out which accusation would emotionally resonate with that particular group, and then put that accusation into circulation all over. In other words, you don't attack the journalist where their enemies live. You attack them where their supporters live. And suddenly the attack looks different. This is what they have been doing lately and they assume everyone is an idiot and we do not understand what’s going on. It no longer is effective if it comes from “the other side.” it is more effective if it comes from someone claiming to be on your side. Someone says, “I'm not attacking this journalist because I don’t like them. I'm exposing them because I care about the truth.” - that’s the new narrative. And now the audience listens. But it is attack disguised as exposure. That is what makes this tactic so much more rotten. We knew this day would come. I hear so many people saying, “I don’t know who to believe anymore. I don’t understand what the truth is.” And this is where God's warning gives us a very simple framework. Jesus already told us how to recognize what is good and what is bad. How to distinguish. He didn't tell us to blindly believe every person who claims to speak for the truth. He gave us the formula! “You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit.” Matthew 7:16–17. ESV Think about how powerful that warning is in the information age. Jesus didn't say, “You will recognize them by the rumors people spread about them, or by other people’s opinions of them. He didn't say, “You will recognize them by how many people accuse them.” He said you will recognize them by their fruits! That means when somebody tells you that a journalist is corrupt, compromised, controlled opposition, a fed, a Russian agent, a liar, a grifter, or anything else, don't immediately let that accusation become your opinion. Look at the fruit, What has this person actually produced? What have they actually reported? What evidence have they brought forward? That is how you know! I've watched the attacks surrounding Candace Owens, Kim Iversen, Max Blumenthal, Aaron Mate, Baron and myself recently, and I'm not interested in telling people that they should blindly defend any journalist. Independent journalists should absolutely be scrutinized. They should be challenged. They should be corrected when they get things wrong. But there is a massive difference between scrutinizing someone's work and what they got wrong factually and destroying someone's reputation through accusations that people are simply expected to believe without real evidence!!!!! Take Candace Owens, for example. For years, the “Russian agent” type of attack has been thrown at people in independent media including - Candace. When that didn’t work, they looked for something that would resonate with the particular audience they were trying to turn against her. In Candace’s case, they had to go with “lesbian” because Candace’s audience is very conservative and religious, and they know that. The Russia angle didn’t work, but this might, because being labeled a lesbian would be more unacceptable to this particular audience - an audience that is highly Christian and very conservative. The money angle and the Jewish angle with Harvey Weinstein didn’t work. So it became: “She is a lesbian.” Of course, that is complete nonsense. Then they started bringing out the big guns, saying, “We have the evidence and some of them are not on the other side they are on the conservative side (Not naming the names here). What they call “proof” is supposedly actual accounts, leaked videos. Okay, but anything can be manufactured online accounts timestamps, and many things can be created by God knows who that is the reality we live in. That’s the truth. So back to - You will recognize them by their fruits! Norman Finkelstein was called - a self hating jew, so he said - ok, well lets say - I’m a self-hating Jew. What does that have to do with the facts? I mean, if Einstein was a self-hating Jew, for arguments sake, does that mean E does not equal MC2? What do the facts have to do with what I am or what I’m not with my work. - And he is right! If Candace Owens is wrong, show where she is wrong. Not what she is or she is not, If she fabricated something, show the fabrication. If she committed fraud, show the evidence. If her reporting is false, dismantle the reporting itself then. The fact that you can’t, is where you go to accusations of who she is or who she is not. And the same principle applies to Kim Iversen. Now the accusation is that Kim is somehow a “fed.” Just like i was accused being a Fed apparently lol. But again, where is the evidence? What has she actually done to deserve that label? What has she actually reported that was wrong? What does her record show? Look at Kim's work. That is the part I think some people keep forgetting. We have entered an age where people are increasingly being encouraged to judge journalists not by what they have actually done, but by what somebody else says they are! And that is incredibly dangerous for a free Society . Because once you convince people to stop looking at the work being done and start looking at accusations, you've made them incredibly easy to manipulate!!! Think about how this works psychologically. If an attack comes from a big media outlet your audience already distrusts, most people will simply dismiss it. But if the same attack comes from somebody who appears to be “one of us,” suddenly it carries much more weight. Dan Cohen, who accused Kim of being a Fed, knew Kim, and he calls himself an independent journalist. He grew his platform through Redacted, a great channel (Absolutely True channel), and then, when he was big enough, he turned around and went ahead started accusing independent journalists like Kim and Aaron Maté of being a Fed. Now, do I think Dan is a sleeper cell who was inserted into the independent-journalist sphere? No. I think he is being manipulated, just like many others are and will be. But Dan forgets the most important principle when he accuses Kim, “You will recognize them by their fruits.” And he ended up as a useful idiot. Kim’s work speaks for itself.PERIOD! This has been a new propaganda spin by the deep state, as the old tactics no longer work. That’s why I believe we are going to see more of this!!! Divide and conquer. Poor Tucker has been hit with every single one of the accusations listed above. Every single one of them. Remember - “You will recognize them by their fruits.”! So, despite what some propagandists out there have to say, I will continue listening to my lesbian, my Qatari/Russian agent, my FED friend and colleague John Kiriakou, and myself the newly exposed FED LOL. And if you need a reminder of how quickly people can change, how easily they can be manipulated and how little words matter when actions tell a different story, watch the video below. It may remind you of a lot!!!!! @RealCandaceO @KimIversenShow @TuckerCarlson @megynkelly @aaronjmate @MaxBlumenthal @BenSwann_ @JohnKiriakou