Jane More retweeted
Trump: "I do not want to lose, as your representative, $90 billion for the privilege of allowing Canada to have a healthcare system and other things that they shouldn't be having. They spend our money very unwisely."
Jane More retweeted
Replying to @essenviews
Hey Trump, you thug: the last time Americans invaded Canada, they got their arses handed to them. Not only that, but we burnt your White House down.
It's laughable that you think you own us. Crawl back under your rock.
Jane More retweeted
🚨 BREAKING
Putin: "I want ordinary citizens of Western countries to hear me.
The truth is that the problems you are facing now are the result of years of actions by the ruling elites of your own countries."
Replying to @GaroSchminke @jaredkushner
Forbes estimates put Jared Kushner's net worth at about $900 million in late 2024, rising to roughly $1 billion by 2026. The increase stems mainly from Affinity Partners, the private equity firm he owns entirely. It has raised funds primarily from Saudi, Qatari and UAE sovereign wealth investors, generating management fees and investment gains. A key performer was its stake in Phoenix Financial, bought starting in 2024; Affinity sold a portion in 2026 for over $340 million at more than five times the cost. Exact personal take-home figures are not disclosed as Affinity is private.
Jane More retweeted
Replying to @WhiteHouse
The ONLY “Record investments” is Trump’s stock trading. Ban insider trading!
Jane More retweeted
Replying to @FBIDirectorKash
Let me correct you:
We are a Constitutional Republic, NOT A DEMOCRACY.
youtu.be/KZOtEbwwfOM?si=ZmAC…
Will you go if you or your parents need the cure? youtu.be/mKHvyi1MyuA?is=Q1VJ…
Jane More retweeted
Replying to @WhiteHouse
Jane More retweeted
🚨 BREAKING:
Netanyahu states:
"Were it not for the Jews, there would be nothing called the United States of America. We brought you into this world, and we can take you out"
What purpose is this statement even serving.
Jane More retweeted
Replying to @joncoopertweets
Jane More retweeted
IDF soldiers tell a young Palestinian man to continue on his way, then shoot him from a distance and kill him.
A cold-blooded field execution. This is not a state, but a terrorist organization.
Jane More retweeted
It always is a source of amazement to me the fact that these people think that their opinion is not only relevant but that it is desired. And noticed.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
Jane More retweeted
Vean el fanatismo de una iglesia evangelista en Los Ángeles (EEUU), donde niños pequeños lloran mientras tocan a un "profeta" durante un ritual pidiendo la "nueva llegada de Jesucristo".
Por lo que sea, este fanatismo religioso cristiano en EEUU donde lavan el cerebro a niños no te lo enseñan, esto aparte de ser una secta, también es maltrato infantil.
Beware of US Ground Beef and what they add to it. youtu.be/Z73YkOT0Nnw?is=uaDI…
Jane More retweeted
Replying to @warDaniel47
@GregAbbott_TX What exactly are you “purging,” Governor? Texas does not have Sharia courts with governmental judicial authority. Texas has one legal system, and every legally enforceable judgment ultimately remains subject to Texas and federal law.
Muslims are allowed to seek voluntary religious mediation and guidance, just as Jews use Beth Din tribunals and Christians use church-based arbitration. That does not create a competing court system. In fact, the Texas Supreme Court has already dealt with Islamic religious arbitration and treated the question under ordinary Texas arbitration and family law, including requiring courts to determine whether an agreement is legally enforceable before compelling arbitration.
And this claim that the “Texas Constitution and statutes have banned Sharia Law” is BS. The Texas Constitution does not contain some blanket ban on Sharia law. It expressly protects freedom of worship and says the government may not give preference to one religious society or mode of worship over another.
Even HB 4211, which Abbott advertised as “banning Sharia compounds,” doesn’t mention Sharia or Islam in the law itself. It regulates certain residential-property arrangements, prohibits discrimination, and prevents those particular contracts from forcing disputes into a tribunal outside the state or federal court system. It applies regardless of religion.
And Abbott’s own government has described this as an investigation into alleged misconduct, not proof that some secret Islamic judicial system has taken over Texas. The Attorney General’s April announcement literally says it is investigating to determine whether the Islamic Tribunal is engaged in illegal activity.
If somebody impersonates a government court, commits fraud, coerces people, or tries to enforce something contrary to Texas or federal law, prosecute them. But Muslims voluntarily seeking religious guidance isn’t illegal any more than Jews consulting a rabbinical court or Christians consulting their church is.
So spare us the chest-thumping about “purging Sharia.” You’re not saving Texas from a parallel Islamic government. You’re taking an existing legal system that already prevents any religious organization from overruling American law and turning it into another culture-war stunt. And “Islam is not compatible with the West” isn’t a legal principle. It’s religious bigotry dressed up as breaking news.
























