Democrats remain white s#premacists.
Replying to @jamestalarico
White skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus. But we spread it wherever we go—through our words, our actions, and our systems. We don’t have to be showing symptoms—like a white hood or a Confederate flag—to be contagious.
So interesting how those who insist democracy is rational form of government and that a “majority” can decide what’s true or right will immediately oppose and fight the majority even after they've lost and are in the minority—as if anyone should still take democracy seriously.
A. The moral law existed before man ever spoke a word, let alone wrote one.
B. The self-proclaimed atheist pays people to put laws in books to stop people from commiting acts they don’t like and will even incarcerate people who “lack belief” in them.
All material evidence is evidence for nothing—a thing whose existence we lack a belief in, yet upon which we depend at every moment for meaning.
—Atheist Brains
I made this meme and I’ve been posting evidence for years just to make the point atheists don’t care about it. Here’s some of the evidence I’ve talked about:
Morality
We perceive morality as obligatory, meaning we ought not murder, steal, we ought provide for our families, etc. We perceive these oughts as objective which is why we argue about them endlessly, because we know there’s a truth about them that’s not subjective, not opinion. But in our experience, only a person with legitimate authority can issue an obligation, someone like a parent, or a leader. If it is the case that right and wrong do exist, then we have real obligations, and that could only make sense a God, a supreme authority, exists. Many atheists will attempt to get around this evidence by denying the existence of real obligations, morality is “an illusion.” But if you’re willing to embrace total nonsense like “it’s not actually wrong to rape a child” just to get around the obvious implications of morality as we perceive it, then it’s very obvious what’s actually going on here.
Design
Because we have minds, we know intimately what sort of things minds make. Minds make information, they make complexity (like a watch), minds make things with purpose (like a spoon is FOR eating soup), minds make order, beauty, etc. When we find something like a sand castle, or a message, we know a mind is almost certainly responsible because a sand castle has order and beauty, and a message has information. Anything with these indicators, indicates the involvement of a mind, aka a designer. And in our world we find these same indicators. We find information in DNA, we find purpose in organs like the heart, or the cell, or the protein…. We find complexity not only in life, but in the universe which is full of chemistry—and we find order… stable laws that govern our reality and allow us to plan for tomorrow. When you understand the indicators of design, you realize the evidence of a designer are all around us. There’s evidence of God almost anywhere you look, just based on the design inference alone.
Laws of logic
Many atheists will tell you that laws of logic are just descriptive, they describe reality. We never see a contradiction, for example. But if laws of logic are descriptive then how can we make inferences, how can we say someone’s reasoning is wrong if all we’re appealing to is what we’ve seen in our little slice of time? Laws of logic are not descriptive, they’re prescriptive and universal. That’s why when someone says they know a married bachelor, we can say for a fact they don’t. A married bachelor can’t exist because it violates the law of logic, not because we haven’t seen one yet. Every time we say an argument is invalid, we’re treating logic as if it’s universal and prescriptive. But where do laws come from? And why are there universal prescriptive laws of rationality that govern our reality? Laws and prescriptions come from minds, so if there’s universal laws we appeal to when we make arguments, there must be a universal mind.
This is just a few lines of evidence and argumentation for the existence of God, I could talk about rationality… consciousness… intelligence… the argument from reason… knowledge… universals… arguments that falsify atheism which indirectly prove God, etc.
The evidence for the existence of God, if you actually* look, is overwhelming.
Christianity: Life--->non-life--->Life
Atheism: non-life--->life--->non-life
It requires more faith to believe in the existence of atheists than it does to believe in all the gods that exist in the brains of those who claim to be atheists.
"Nature doesn't 'design' it tinkers."
I’ve never seen an atheist demonstrate that a non mind can generate things like information or complexity. I’ve seen them look at things like information and complexity and make baseless assertion, I’ve seen them beg the question… but where is one single demonstration of a non mind being ultimately responsible for any indication of design? Not an assertion, a demonstration.
Name ONE.
Same ol' woke racists, at large in the WNBA.
youtu.be/Ev373c7wSRg&t=0m30s
Atheism is a self-defeating ideology, and those who claim it is rational are constantly shooting themselves in the foot.
Further evidence that the self-proclaimed atheist lacks belief in the existence of their own logic, human rights, and opinions, and why they're unable to recognize the fallacies that clearly exist as material in their mind.
Thank God that Logic and human rights aren't man-made.
The reason the self-proclaimed atheist strikes through “In the beginning…” and replaces it with “Once upon a time…” is that the Bible isn’t the fairy tale they want it to be. They need the Bible to sound like their theory of evolution.






















