The Transhumanist World-Order Current and where EQORIA Fits. Let me split this into two parts: the Earth Constitution itself (short, because there's less there than the branding implies), and the broader transhumanist-governance current (the substantive thread). The EQORIA "Earth Constitution" Dec 12, 2000 ... EQORIA's self-declared "seed conception" date (note: the org wasn't registered for another 15 years) Apr 12, 2020 "EQORIA Charter" released, declaring "United Citizens of Earth" Mar 12, 2021 "Earth Constitution Legislation Committee" formed Apr 21, 2021 First version of the "Earth Constitution" announced. Jul 12, 2026, Second version announced. The founder: One James Angelo (also styled "James Qor Angelo," "James Angelo Eqorian," and reportedly the alias "Ray Yagubyan"), self-described as "First Citizen of EQORIA" and holder of a "PhD in Planetarian Singularity and Harmonism", a credential that doesn't correspond to any accredited program. He's tied to Eqosoft, a company in the same ecosystem. Bottom line on the Constitution: It's a branding artifact of a 9-person nonprofit, not a governance instrument. The grandiosity is the product. The Real Transhumanist World-Order Current This is the substantive thread and it's decades old, well-documented, and worth understanding. The academic literature (Bell & Taillandier's Cosmos-politanism paper is a strong entry point) traces it cleanly. The founding vision (1920s–30s) J.B.S. Haldane and J.D. Bernal both believed technoscience would dissolve the nation-state system. Bernal explicitly called for an "aristocracy of scientific intelligence" to lead humanity past nationalism. Their logic: nationalism + modern weaponry = industrial slaughter (WWI). The cure was biological and political engineering—reengineer human passions toward universalism, and build a technocratic world government. SOUND FAMILIAR? The mid-century universalists Julian Huxley (UNESCO's first director) wanted cultural and moral unification under scientific planning, he saw the UN and Western science as the vehicle. FM-2030 (Esfandiar) went further: his "UpWingers" wanted to "do away with the very institution of government" entirely, replacing it with "instant universal participation." The libertarian turn (1980s–90s) Max More's extropianism rejected both states and supranational bodies. The vision: anarcho-capitalism, with private contracts replacing law, and space colonization or "sea-steading" as escape routes from terrestrial government. This is the direct ancestor of today's Silicon Valley "network state" and "micro-ordering zone" ideas and it's the strand EQORIA's "ownerless, borderless" language echoes. The Bell & Taillandier paper identifies three features uniting all transhumanist world-order visions, left and right: Reengineer human rationality and biology to direct evolution Vanguardism, nations and states are secondary; enlightened scientific elites or advanced AI systems lead the transition. SOUND FAMILIAR? Supranational governance as the endpoint whether a world federation, a global market, or Bostrom's "singleton" (a single decision-making agency controlling the planet). SOUND FAMILIAR? That third one is the key concept. Bostrom's "singleton" is the academically respectable version of "one world governance", ya,a single global agent that solves coordination problems. It's discussed seriously in AI-safety and governance circles. Now, where EQORIA might get dismissed, it is a fringe footnote to this current, not a node in it. But it's a telling footnote, because it demonstrates the pattern: It borrows the vocabulary "singularity," "ownerless," "planetary coordination," "post-national" It claims the endpoint, an "Earth Constitution" superseding national citizenship It has none of the substance no funding, no institutional backing, no legal recognition It's aspirational branding dressed as governance. Who are really the stage managers? 👇