Pinned Tweet
#DaneWigington claims that geoengineering (jet aircraft spraying particulates) is ongoing, but none of the "proof" he offers is valid. @GeoengWatch
Since this is led by Jim Lee and Michael Hogan, I assume this is going to be about impurities in jet fuel. These guys believe cleaner jet fuel would prevent persistent contrails. Unfortunately, that is not so simple.
GREAT NEWS ABOUT THE BATTLE AGAINST CHEMTRAILS ✈️⛅️☀️
Dear Friends,
For years, millions of people have looked up at the skies and asked the same questions:
What are those trails spreading across the atmosphere? Why do some disappear quickly while others expand into massive white haze that blankets the sky? Why has the public never received clear answers? And why have governments and regulatory agencies consistently avoided addressing this directly?
For the past two years, researchers, legal experts, public health advocates, and environmental investigators have conducted one of the most extensive independent investigations ever undertaken into these questions.
What we uncovered is far bigger than most people realize.
After hundreds of hours of scientific analysis, federal regulatory review, atmospheric data investigation, and legal research, we are now prepared to publicly reveal what we found.
This is not speculation. This is not internet rumor.
This is a formal federal legal action backed by peer-reviewed science, government data, documented atmospheric evidence, and the government’s own records.
A landmark Petition for Rulemaking has now been formally filed with the EPA. For the first time, a comprehensive legal and scientific case regarding atmospheric aerosol operations and emissions has been placed directly into the federal record.
The EPA is now legally required to respond.
The clock has started.
The agency has 180 days to answer. If it refuses to act, the next step is federal court.
This changes everything.
For over twenty years, citizens, researchers, legislators, and environmental activists have asked the right questions while lacking a complete legal and scientific framework to force accountability.
Now that framework exists.
For the first time, the science, legal mechanisms, regulatory pathways, documented evidence, and accountability structure have all been unified into one coordinated federal action.
We are no longer merely asking questions.
We are demanding answers.
And this time, those answers cannot simply be ignored.
What we uncovered challenges many assumptions people have held for years. Some findings may surprise even longtime researchers. But the evidence speaks for itself.
This is not a replay of old debates.
This is entirely new ground.
And it is historic.
Joining this effort are leading researchers and advocates including James Franklin Lee Jr. of ClimateViewer News LLC, Reinette Senum of GenSeven and SaveOurSkies.org, Leslie Manookian of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, Michael Hogan of Missouri Clean Skies, and Valerie Ferrell of Stand for Health Freedom.
During the public webinar, the coalition will present:
• Scientific evidence and atmospheric data
• Federal documents exposing regulatory failures
• The legal strategy now in motion
• What this means for state-level efforts nationwide
• The path forward toward genuine atmospheric accountability and clean skies
Monday, May 4, 2026
5:00 PM Pacific
Streaming live on YouTube, Rumble, and X.
A live Q&A will follow.
Bring your questions. Bring your skepticism. Bring your evidence.
We will bring ours.
Two years ago, this investigation began with questions. What was uncovered revealed a much larger picture involving atmospheric operations, regulatory failures, environmental consequences, and institutional silence that can no longer be ignored.
The era of vague speculation is ending.
The era of evidence, legal accountability, and direct federal challenge has begun.
Monday night, the public will finally see the full picture.
youtube.com/live/jGlVChXfNk0…
Current aircraft are optimized to work with the current jet fuel. You can't just suddenly switch to a different fuel, it would involve a great deal of modifications to the engines and fuel systems, fuel production technology, not to mention the costs and economy and tradeoffs.
I have a hard time believing that @Justin_JE_Mabie, a former NOAA scientist, is a chemtrail believer. I think the Geofight lawyers hijacked his whistleblower-retaliation case and inserted their chemtrail/geoengineering nonsense into his complaint. They are bad lawyers!
What is this nonsense @Justin_JE_Mabie?
Complaint about preserving historical weather data, mixed up with some chemtrailer nonsense?
thegeofight.com/documents/ma…
What is this nonsense @Justin_JE_Mabie?
Complaint about preserving historical weather data, mixed up with some chemtrailer nonsense?
thegeofight.com/documents/ma…
Missouri committee hearing on the anti-chemtrail bill HB2388.
Reps Steve Jordan and Burt Whaley are sponsors. Michael Hogan from @MOCleanSkies major witness and instigator of the bill.
And a bunch of the usual chemtrailer nutcases giving testimony.
sg001-harmony.sliq.net/00325…
Quotes proving Reps Jordan and Whaley are chemtrail believers:
Whaley: "We do know this is happening, we have evidence".
Jordan: "Our government is behind a lot of this"
Jordan: "We're talking (about) aluminum, barium, strontium"
Quote proving Michael Hogan @MOCleanSkies is still a chemtrail believer:
"My parents died of Alzheimer's ... aluminum is a leading cause ... I did a water test in my backyard, came back with pretty high levels of aluminum ... that is a byproduct of geoengineering, potentially"
All the proposed legislation to ban weather modification and geoengineering in US states is motivated by chemtrail conspiracy beliefs, even if representatives make a strong effort to pretend they are just preemptive bans. None of this legislation makes any sense at all.
MOCleanSkies is still a chemtrail believer, just like the representatives who are pushing the anti-chemtrail legislation in Missouri. They try to hide their true beliefs claiming it's just "proactive" legislation, but sometimes they slip up.
Replying to @MOCleanSkies
I just listened to the part when you said your parents died of Alzheimer's and you believe the aluminum from geoengineering may have caused it. So you still believe it is happening. Come on guys, you can't pretend you are not chemtrail believers.
GeoengWatch Debunked retweeted
Replying to @climateviewer
I don't believe what's written here. It may have been the intent, but without success. It is not possible to create, intensify, or steer a hurricane. No major hurricanes hit Cuba between 1965-82, and there was no economic collapse. These are tall tales with no supporting sources.
GeoengWatch Debunked retweeted
Replying to @STROHFLOW @Xx17965797N
This photo is from 1967, from the book Cloud Studies in Colour by Richard Scorer and Harry Wexler.
Sorry you didn't look up before you started to look up.
None of the 5 UK ARIA funded geoengineering research projects involve spraying from aircraft.
1. Re-thickening sea ice
2-4. marine cloud brightening w/ spraying sea salt from ships, or electric charge.
5. takes materials into the stratosphere with a ballon, but brings them back.
Details of each project:
aria.org.uk/opportunity-spac…









