Pinned Tweet
I want to leave aside whatever political differences I have with this woman, and just strictly focus on what she's doing in this specific post:
-she (Persian Jewess) learns that Bill Ackmans company allegedly is getting falsely accused by a woman
-she then immediately makes it about her own supposed victimhood, instead of commenting mostly or entirely about the merits (or lack thereof) of the woman's accusations against Bills company. This is main character syndrome on steroids (or rather, on estroturbo)
-she also conveniently ignores why it's morally righteous for a merit based (as opposed to equity based) organization to lay off those pregnant employees: because they fail to do equal labor & productivity as their male (obviously non pregnant) employees, due to being out of commission for at least multiple months. In other words, feminists like her demand equal pay/benefits for LESSER work (in either quantity or commitment or efficiency or creativity). Sound familiar? This is the same anti equality arguments pushed by feminist athletes who insist on equal sponsorships, while getting massively Pikachu faced by Trans women (ie men) who destroy the athletic performance of bio women
-finally, she ends her post by saying that the true victims of false accusations are the legit female accusers who have yet to come out. This is bullshit. The actual victims of false accusations, are the falsely accused (usually men). The future accusers are hypothetical victims: not real yet, if ever.
This is an incredible sociopathic ability to twist an (alleged) injustice against a man into a victim-larping "main character syndrome" exhibited by countless Femcels - and yes that includes so called conservative women.
PS: I keep using the word allegedly, to leave open the possiblity that maybe Bills company is guilty of what he's being accused. You see, unlike the BAW movement, I don't automatically believe all women, until we see receipts or historical patterns.
When I was starting out in my career, I worked at an international firm headquartered in NYC.
There were six people in my specialty group. Three male partners and three female associates. I was the most junior.
The most senior associate was passed over for partner after disclosing she was pregnant with her second child. She had been with the firm for seven years. She silently had her baby, took her leave, and quit within months of returning to the office.
The mid-level associate was fired within two months of returning from maternity leave. The partners refused to staff her on deals so they could claim she had low billable hours. They knew she was the breadwinner for her family, so to avoid a wrongful termination lawsuit, they offered her three months severance and agreed not to disclose the termination to future employers in exchange for a waiver of claims.
Then I got pregnant.
By then, our group had shrunk to four people: three male partners and me as the only associate.
And right on schedule, when my chance for promotion came, I was passed over too.
Like the two women before me, I could not risk being blacklisted by suing. So I quietly left, found another job, and kept what happened to myself.
Workplace discrimination is real. It is devastating. And it happens far more often than people want to admit.
That is exactly why false accusations are so damaging.
When predatory people like @BillAckmanās āRondaā weaponize harassment claims for attention, leverage, or a payday, they make it even harder for women with legitimate experiences to speak up.
So Bill, on this one, Iām with you. Thank you for calling out this behavior for what it is.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
The "historic" first lesbian judge on the D.C. Federal Court, Judge Ana Reyes, doesn't know how many sexes there are but is certain that there are at least 30.
I'm glad this post is going viral, and I fully agree with him.
CHRISTIAN MEN need to understand:
When it comes to mating patterns, the ONLY difference between Christian women and feminists, is that the former uses Christianity as a shield when a Christian male prospect inquires about her sexual history*
So ask yourselves:
Are you cukt enough to wife up a "born again Christian" larper who used to be a DNA collector and is now pretending that looks matter less than "Christian values"?
*The women behind this "Christian" female podcast (Girls Gone Bible) are former party girls, who used to go clubbing constantly and engaging in nightly casual interactions (interpret that as you will).
Someone like this:
Itās crazy to me how many Christians donāt understand the point of this tweet.
Heās not saying that she should date someone sheās not attracted to.
What Ryan is saying is that a bunch of women use religion as a shield to find a good man while still being just as shallow as people who arenāt religious, despite sitting on podcasts and talking about the faith and how they value things like character or what Jesus represents.
When I said that every woman is a FEMINIST to some degree, this is what I meant. Itās so deeply encoded in society and their psyche that it has become automatic to the point where a bunch of them donāt even understand their own minds.
This woman for example is 36 years old and an ex-escort who is now āborn again.ā But if a good man who is pure and true to his faith that she liked, viewed her past as a red flag, she would use the faith and the Bible to argue that she had repented and that he shouldnāt judge her. Basically, she is positioning herself in a win-win situation because you can grift easily with religion. Itās like an escape plan and a bunch of Christian men who are extremely emasculated will eat it up.
So, once again, Christian women are NO DIFFERENT from liberals, openly admitted feminists, or anyone else in this regard. A woman will always be a woman, adapting to whatever society looks like.
years ago I came across a local feminist LAWYER whose clients were female prostitutes.
I remember being shocked that she (the feminist lawyer) proudly stated that a consensual sexual act can be RETROACTIVELY declared a š if the prostitute later found certain things about the male client that were deceptive
(Her specific example was if a male client paid the prostitute in cash, then later it turns out that the cash was counterfeit bills)
In those days, I wanted to believe that such repulsive feminist retcon was a rare case among her demographic.
But now, many years later, we should all admit that such evil retcon has been very mainstream among her demographic for a long time:
The Abortionist gender has no problem unaliving innocent humans more vulnerable than them.
So why would they not target innocent men, too?
Yet more examples of "anti-woke" female influencers...
1. Refusing to hold her gender more accountable, given their greater evil in voting for the feminist theology of Open-Borderism
2. Demanding men save them (for her gender's malignant choices, for which they refuse to admit), and shaming men when they don't.
Non misandrist Men should say to these "anti-woke" women:
GO SAVE YOURSELF, princess. š
Credit: @NorCalHKYplayer
Before anyone is tempted to think that this is unusual, remember:
Statistically, young Western women love Islam.
They love Open-Borderism.
They love Palestine.
They love the stereotypical hip-hop genre that sexualizes women.
Make of that, what you will.
āLike Mohamed Merah, dodge the cameras. Bataclan, I shot him in the eye, manhunt, Salah Abdeslam [ā¦] Who but Allah can stop me?ā
This young girl and her friends are desecrating a church while singing a rap song that references Islamist terrorists Salah Abdeslam and Mohamed Merah.
This is also one of the consequences of African immigration: our own young people assimilating in reverse into the dominant culture, even when that culture is vile, spits on France, and mocks native French victims of Islamist terrorist attacks.
This girl deserves a couple of slaps from her parents.
>be a feminist
>Promote and (sometimes impose) the Sexual Revolutionā¢
>Promote š hoaxing and mob justice as a wholesale substitute to evidence and "innocent until proven guilty"
>Blame men when that backfires
The normalization of casual sex destroyed our comprehension of what sex is, and what it has to do with healthy relationships.
Women have one reproductive strategy: high investment. Men have two strategies: high investment (which is collaborative, and has everything to do with love) and no investment (which is predatory, and is the antithesis of love).
That may sound like an exaggeration, but it isnāt. The āno investmentā strategy of men attempts to stick a woman with a child to raise alone, or with a cuckolded partner. It has a consensual form, and a non-consensual form. Does any of that sound loving to you? I didnāt think so.
For men, producing a child with a trivial effort is the ultimate evolutionary bargain. Itās something like winning the lottery. For women, being stuck with a baby and no partner is the inverse, like being maimed in car wreck.
So men are predisposed to be on the lookout for fertile women who are gullible enough to go to bed with them without locking down a commitment. And women are predisposed to avoid such encounters at all costs. Or at least they were before birth control + abortion changed the stakes and the culture.
Women, who have always been the gatekeepers of sex, have been lured into embracing men at their worst. And theyāve started behaving and thinking like them too.
There is actually a lot of truth in the idea that ārape cultureā has been normalized. Casual sex is not rape by any stretch, but it comes from the same predatory branch of the tree. And before you jump down my throat for saying that, notice just how commonplace āconsensual con-consentā has become. That IS normalized rape culture. It comes from the idea that sex is a kind of play. Just like kids playing with toy tanks and soldiers, itās harmless because the stakes are low and no one actually gets hurt.
But it turns out thatās not true. Casual sex is like playing with fire. Actually, itās worse. Many who play with fire get away with it. They may even learn how to wield it to great effect. The exact opposite is true with sex. If you play with having sex with people that you donāt love, you are damaging the very architecture you will need to form a healthy romantic partnership. Even worse if they bring the same selfish mindset to the alter and the bedroom.
For young people participating in their generationās culture, sex now IS antagonistic and predatory. Most of them donāt know there is any other kind. Itās just some story, like Santa Clause.
Not only has this shift in sexual culture obliterated the tools to forge and tend a healthy marriage, but it has also broken the motivational structure that built civilization.
ā-
Exhibit A bellow. Please donāt jump on her. She is voicing a false sophistication of her era. And although I believe what she has said is wrong, exactly why it is wrong, and to what degree it is wrong, requires careful thought.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Cornell student activist group held a "mock trial" where they declared all seven defendants guilty, put each of their pictures on a wooden stake, and then smashed the stakes into the ground, as some form of vengeful symbolic punishment?
...aaaand this is what happens when feminists keep rejecting biological sciences (see also their continued support for Trans feminism):
They are genuinely clueless why low body count is so important to men.
Answer:
-It's for the same reason why his height is so important to women.
-It's for the same reason why his income is so important to women.
-It's for the same reason why his homeowner status is so important to women.
-It's for the same reason why she would rather share an alpha, than be exclusive to a beta soft feminist.
-It's for the same reason why she wants to mate with her superior, rather than her equal
Remember years ago, when Western feminists were queasy about sex selective abortions happening in China and India?
.... It turns out, that's only cuz the baby was female. š
(Image credit goes to @Blueblur_23 )
yet another hilarious reminder that even "far right" groups like the GROYPER movements are ideologically compromised by Femshittification own-goaling.
We've seen similar examples elsewhere on the Right, see also:
Leonarda Jonie
Pearly Things
Sarah stock
Ella Maulding
Pearl Davis
Isabella Moody
Lauren Southern
Emily Wilson (aka Emily saves America)
Amy Dangerfield
Ashley St Clair
Angela Halili + Arielle Reitsma (aka Girls Gone Bible)
Zoe Cabina of Quillete
Felicia Hughes (boob girl in the Whatever podcast who wears that Prussian helmet)
Mikhaila Peterson
Tomi Lahren
(Yes I know some of these are not groypettes)
(Btw the screenshot of Spanish right-wing Ada was uploaded literally in the midst of her rage-posting about the recent Ceuta migrant crisis, during its height)
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
šØ IT'S OFFICIAL: Lindsay Clancy holdout juror Michael Desronvil just PUBLICLY SAID NO ā he had ZERO reasonable doubt on deciding Clancy was guilty
The liberal jurors lied. Clancy's defense attorney LIED!
DESRONVIL: "There were moments that were tense...I had a lot of evidence to back up my claim. Out of respect to the other jurors and the court system, I will put that to sleep for now." šÆ
What a good man.
The other jurors rushed to the media to SPILL EVERYTHING and drop public comments about specifics of the case
Desronvil is only going public to defend his name and is giving out ZERO behind-closed-doors specific details to protect the integrity of the case
Why? Because he actually wants justice for the children she k*lled šš»
Desronvil believed the evidence showed Clancy knew exactly what she was doing and planned it. For that, he got smeared in the press and had his phone records demanded
Clancy's attorney must leave this man alone!
@kayleighmcenany
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Double standards. She has 340,000 followers. If a man said this about women he would be BANNED. Why is this allowed on TikTok? The moral panic about the supposed āmanosphereā but ZERO scrutiny about the much larger and much worse āfemisphereā.
Before men fall into the trap of becoming women's "allies" within this civil war between Legacy feminists vs Trans feminists....
remember that Legacy feminists (like JK Rowling or this French woman in this clip) are great at victim-larping her way out of her gender's accountability for this own-goaling mess, while falsely blaming men
(conveniently failing to mention that Trans feminism is mostly imposed by women on us normies)
another day, another instance of a š hoaxer targeting an Alpha after realizing he's moved on from her
Aka, the alpha widow phenomenon:
NEW: The woman who accused looksmaxxer Clavicular of r*ping her at his familyās Cape Cod home has dropped the s*xual assault claims from civil lawsuit, according to NBC.
Aleksandra Vasilevna Mendoza, 18, accused Clavicular of r*ping her when she was 17.
Her lawyer now says that the s*xual assault count has been dropped.
"At this time, the s*xual assault count against Braden Peters has been dropped from the civil litigation in Miami, Florida due to the pending criminal charges in Massachusetts," the lawyer said to Boston 25.
"In light of Mr. Petersā recent posts and other conduct, this matter is more appropriate for the criminal justice system. Ms. Mendoza does not want her civil case to interfere with that process."
Mendoza also accused the influencer of injecting her with Aqualyx, a fat-dissolving substance.
I agree with the sentiment behind this LifeNews post
Btw , we're yet again seeing certain "anti-woke conservative" female influencers ally themselves with the Abortionist class, as they BOTH TRY TO MORALLY EQUATE a murdering torturer (taxpayer subsidized Christa Pike) to a human baby (who by definition is more innocent than the most innocent human adult).
Questions for those females:
1. Would you like society to morally equate a wife beater with the wife? (Is that too much consistency for you?)
Or is your anti-human logic ONLY allowed for grasping at any straws to excuse your feminist thirst for unaliving the most vulnerable humans on the planet?
2. Where were you pearl clutching females, when male convicts who did what Christa Pike did were executed?
Where were your protests for his gender?
3. Is the pro life movement more about preserving innocent life? The most undeservingly targeted innocent life?
Or is it about a blanket ideology of saving all life, regardless of morality?
4. Have you heard of something called suicidal empathy?
Liberals: Executing Christa Pike is āCruel and Unusual Punishment,ā Abortion Up to Birth is OK lifenews.com/2026/10/09/libeā¦
another day, another example of "anti-woke" female pundit outsourcing shitty women's behaviors by promoting victim-larp:
"Preyed on women"
"Hurts women"
"Benefits men"
...How many examples do we need, that prove these "anti-woke" women have much more in common with their left-wing female counterparts than with non misandrist men?
Consensual hookup culture often feels predatory to women because... it is. It preys on women's desire for monogamy and coupling and love, which many believe there's a chance of receiving even after casual sex. Frat bros around America are indebted to Alex Cooper for trying to convince so many women they can and should have sex like men. It's led to men having a lot more casual sex because women choose to have it. That norm is great for dudes, but women often end up feeling preyed upon and exploited because they experience sex differently and just can't ā on average ā have casual hookups so easily.
Cooper preyed on women to make millions by convincing them it was normal to see sex more like men see it. Men who mislead women into having casual sex by dangling the prospect of monogamy prey on women. It doesn't mean women are helpless! And it doesn't mean non-consensual sex is anything short of horrifying and criminal. It just means there's a predatory culture swirling around even consensual hookups too, and it's really dangerous for women.
Yet another clueless, uneducated feminist woman who is literally fabricating oppression where none existed...
1. No, Organized religion did NOT arise out of a desire to "subjugate women".
Firstly, patriarchy was historically not at all about "subjugating women", it's about a complementary social system that maximizes happiness and belonging for both genders
(Ex: see the rock-bottom mental health stats for both genders under today's matriarchal, feminist society).
Secondly, Patriarchy existed long BEFORE organized religion existed.
2. Organized religion arose out of an increasingly more complex, more sophisticated society whereby population was increasing and urbanizing.
And just as economic systems were becoming more complex in the pre-writing era, so was religion.
3. Organized religion is simultaneously responsible for saving certain cultures and languages from extinction, as well as contributing to the extinction of certain cultures and languages.
There are many examples of this.
It's nuanced.
4. This is yet another reminder that civilizations' greatest (and least knowledgeable) backstabbers are their young female demographic:
they are universally the MOST anti Christian, anti Western demographic.




































