这种深度 AI 伪造更加地讽刺
AI 叙事也许在这一刻跌入谷底
黄仁勋夫人Lori对出轨事件的回应……
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
这段视频并非Lori Huang对出轨事件的真实回应。她至今未公开发表任何声明，视频内容（包括“28年”说法，与实际结婚逾40年不符）疑似AI生成或伪造。
global.hk01.com/%E7%83%AD%E7%8…
stheadline.com/realtime-world…
newsweek.com/lori-huang-jen…
1
64
别人出轨那就是棒打
AI教父出轨，为了自己的仓位你还得说出轨应该的。
你们真的是屁股决定了脑袋，毫无自我评判标准。怪不得高位接盘泡沫🫧
黄仁勋果然出轨了，这是《金融时报》引述的美国情报部门的结论。
这篇（付费）报道的要点为：
美国政府认为英伟达（Nvidia）首席执行官黄仁勋曾与Alice Huang（又名黄乐）存在浪漫关系。
Alice Huang是新加坡数据中心公司Megaspeed的中国高管，同时也是英伟达的客户。
报道要点如下：
•美国官员今年早些时候根据美国情报信息撰写了一份备忘录，其中称黄仁勋曾与Alice Huang存在浪漫关系。
•美国情报界评估认为，Alice Huang被中国国家安全部（MSS，中国主要情报机构）招募为间谍。
•这份备忘录在美国总统唐纳德·特朗普2026年5月赴北京与习近平举行峰会前不久，被分享给一小群美国高层官员。
•白宫和中央情报局拒绝对此置评。英伟达拒绝对备忘录或关系指控置评。该公司此前表示，黄仁勋每年会见“数千名客户高管”，且公司内部调查相关指控（包括涉及Megaspeed的指控）后未发现不当行为的证据。记者未能联系到Alice Huang置评。
•两人在一起的照片和视频已在社交媒体上流传。
此报道此前有《纽约时报》的报道称，美国情报机构将Alice Huang视为中国资产，她与黄仁勋建立了密切接触（可能旨在获取英伟达相关信息，并影响对华先进AI芯片出口政策）。据称，川普此前曾被告知相关情报，但未采取行动。
Megaspeed还因可能将先进英伟达芯片转运至中国、违反出口管制而受到美国审查。
该事件已促使美国众议院共和党相关委员会主席（涉及中国问题、外交事务和情报委员会）要求黄仁勋进行闭门简报。中方此前称相关间谍指控为“毫无根据的猜测”。
上述核心指控均基于熟悉备忘录和情报评估的匿名消息人士；这些并非已公开证实的事实。
277
大家都在说民主党这次挨骂了，其实根本不是。
据我在纽约的体感，普通人（绝大部分民众）都觉得挺舒爽的。AI实际上也没帮助大部分人摆脱困境，反倒让日子更加难过了。
投票投出来的民意，这就是结果🤌
《大空头》看过没，有人输就有人赢。只有在接盘AI幻想的股民才在X上哭闹！
1
174
孙哥布林再一次向 @realDonaldTrump 发难了
且不说他是不是好人，起码猴精猴精的，审时度势这块是第一名。
可以说中期选举已经有答案了
Last night, my lawyers moved to sanction World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi for failing to disclose, until months into my litigation against the company, that it is a citizen of the UAE 🇦🇪 . #WLFI #USD1
For those who are new to this dispute, I was one of World Liberty’s earliest and largest investors. In November 2024, I agreed to buy $30 million of $WLFI tokens under a Token Purchase Agreement with World Liberty, and I later increased my total investment to $45 million.
In April, I sued World Liberty, alleging that the company induced my investment through fraud and then unlawfully froze my tokens.
My Token Purchase Agreement gives me the right to bring my claims in either California federal or state court.
I chose federal court.
Federal courts can hear a case like mine only when the two sides come from different places. Foreign plaintiffs like me can sue an American defendant in federal court, but foreign plaintiffs generally cannot sue a foreign defendant there. For these purposes, a company like World Liberty takes on the citizenship of each of its owners, so a single foreign owner makes the company foreign.
In other words, so long as World Liberty and all of its owners were American, my case could be heard in federal court.
The federal court’s rules required World Liberty to file a disclosure at the start of the case identifying every one of its owners and where each is a citizen. World Liberty’s disclosure identified only one entity—World Liberty itself—and listed Florida as its sole citizenship. Its lawyers certified that they were unaware of anyone else who needed to be disclosed.
World Liberty then moved to compel arbitration, seeking to pull my case out of open court and into secret arbitration proceedings.
I opposed that motion, and my lawyers spent months and hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting it. At a hearing in August, the Court signaled that it was not persuaded that my claims belonged in arbitration. Instead, the Court ruled that certain of my claims should stay in open court, and certain claims should be sent to arbitration, and ordered the parties to meet and confer to come up with a proposed agreement on which claims stay in open court and which ones go to arbitration.
Less than a week later, World Liberty suddenly “corrected” its disclosure. Where it had previously listed only one member in its ownership chain, it now listed 22, and claimed citizenship in Florida, Delaware, Puerto Rico, and the UAE.
World Liberty now says that the federal court has no jurisdiction over my case, since its UAE citizenship means there are foreign parties on both sides of the case.
The irony is hard to miss. World Liberty’s gold paper declares that “[b]y design, World Liberty Financial is not organized offshore,” and that it is “an American, tax-paying, corporation that aims to bring DeFi to its rightful home—America.” It promises a “US-based decentralized platform” built on “American ideals of liberty, privacy, and freedom to transact,” calls private, intermediary-free transactions “a core American value,” and boasts that “[r]ather than shying away from the United States, World Liberty Financial embraces the United States as the future CRYPTO CAPITAL OF THE PLANET.”
World Liberty was proudly American 🇺🇸 when it was selling tokens. It discovered its UAE 🇦🇪 roots only when it needed a way out of an American federal courtroom.
World Liberty presumably always knew who its owners were. Its lawyers claim that they learned about the company’s UAE citizenship only after they filed the original disclosure.
As my motion explains, if that is true, then either World Liberty’s lawyers failed to conduct appropriate diligence, or World Liberty did not give its lawyers a straight answer. When we asked how this happened, World Liberty refused to tell us.
Token holders deserve to know whether the projects they invest in are telling the truth, both to the public and to courts. I am filing this motion to hold World Liberty and its lawyers accountable for what I believe was a misleading disclosure to the Court, and to make sure that the cost of World Liberty’s gamesmanship falls on them, not on me.
And after my sanctions motion is resolved in federal court, I will re-file my lawsuit against World Liberty in California state court.
I will keep fighting for the transparency this community deserves.
279
利空跌不动了，那是因为你刚好躲在了周末了真正的跌幅还没开始呢。
没人在这里喊牛市没了，都在喊抓紧上车。
还是那句话周期变了，那就有可能有更恐怖的低点，而不是低点结束。
周期还是周期，它会一直存在。
1
171
再买0.05%就可以拿着这些ETH震荡一整个牛初。 他不割肉以太不拉
Tom Lee (@fundstrat)'s #Bitmine bought another 5,000 $ETH ($11.22M) 6 hours ago.
Bitmine now holds 6.065M $ETH ($13.7B), 4.96% of the total supply.
arkm.com/explorer/entity/bit…
177
朝鲜说：这次我们不背锅
@cz_binance 到底什么情况呢？
1
154
