Surprised Trump didn't really have some fun with it - it's like his trademark man. Zacharia the new Scaramucci or is Zacharia just half a Scaramucci?
Breaking news: Katie Zacharia has been fired as White House Press Secretary after just 5 days.
Source: NYT
nytimes.com/2026/10/16/us/po…
This is brilliant on so many levels
El-Sayed: Trump’s neat trick is to become the subject of every conversation and to force people to take sides. And here’s the thing about it: once you take sides, he’s forcing you to double down on crazier and crazier stuff. And soon enough, you’re out here signing on to a bunch of things that, like three years ago, you’re like, “That’s insane.”
But here’s the problem: you don’t want to have to face down that one friend who’s going to tell you, “I told you so.”
And so what happens is that you keep doubling down on the craziest stuff. And you find yourself so far gone up that tree that there’s no way you can climb down. We’ve got to help those folks. Because guess what? They’re paying for $5 gas too. They’re paying insane diesel prices too. They can’t see a doctor either
As with markets and AI - most often opponents talk past each other because they're focused on different time horizons
The old Yudkowskian guess was that verifiable domains like coding and AI research would spike first, and then build AI with higher general intelligence to drag wide AI capability along. Briefly, there was a passing phase of history where AI was mostly trained on human data and looked less spiky around verifiable domains, and people boasted and shouted that all Yudkowskian scenarios had been falsified. I admittedly didn't predict that transient departure! But like many other little surprises that people shouted and boasted had falsified some question of deep foundations, that passing age would only last a few years. Pretrain has dropped to a 7% share of compute, and matters now revert back to older trends and the first-order predictions of underlying theory. People had vastly over-updated on the month's latest news, lacking deep roots themselves and having not watched the field of AI change and change again over decades.
Many dynamics are easier to predict as the forces involved become stronger, less subject to noise. Over and over and over again now, the answer to those who cry, "But the particular AI I see today doesn't look like what Yudkowsky was talking about!" has been proven, exonerated, verified and established to be: "Tomorrow's AI will."
It is of course another large problem that tons of people are making shit up I never said, and calling that falsified.
George W. retweeted
California, it’s time to vote!
Check your mailbox and make sure to return your ballot as soon as possible.
In the Golden State, we cherish democracy.
Haven’t received your ballot yet? Don’t worry! Ballots are making their way through the mail system, so keep an eye out for it, as they may take up to 10 days to make it to your mailbox.
#CATrustedInfo2026 #VoteCalifornia
Russ Vought understands how the federal government works - if there is a way to use the government to tip the scales voting wise - Vought would find it. It would likely be illegal whatever he goes with, but it would probably create genuine headaches in the mean time
George W. retweeted
If your theory of change was to prioritize the United States House races and perhaps local legislatures, fair. But now the Senate is in play - tied or ahead in places where the Dem is underfunded and not well known. Now is the time to give to Dem Senate races. Today. Thanks.
Actually - AI creating inflation probably is a big issue - even if i do not for a second think it's the full answer - it is without question an answer - in the same way that incumbents around the globe were voted out of office in 2024 due to inflation
New newsletter: WHY AMERICANS HATE AI
AI might be the most instantly unpopular emerging technology in modern history.
Off the top of my head, I blame the rise of tech pessimism, the emergence of anti-billionaire politics, the fallout from disappointments of the social media age, the demonization (sometimes fair, sometimes unfair) of data centers, growing distrust of corporations in general, or the fact that people don’t appreciate being told that a new product is going to disemploy their children and destroy the world, while its architects become billionaires.
But there’s another reason that these explanations overlook: AI's prophets promised a world of cheap abundance. But the AI buildout has created the exact opposite reality, in which basically everything AI touches is getting more expensive.
We're seeing higher prices for everything in the AI buildout—electronics, electricity, construction labor, even credit. The Fed now believes that the growth from AI is pushing up overall inflation, which means AI is also a contributor to higher interest rates.
We get so wrapped up in talking about what AI will do in the near future that we sometimes forget to look closely at what it's doing right now: a project broadly predicted to reduce prices and create post-material abundance is instead raising prices and showing everybody just how materially finite some parts of the economy are.
derekthompson.org/p/were-mis…
He's good
Calling all NYC artists — painters, filmmakers, poets, musicians and more! Did you know our city provides grants to support your work every year?
And this year, for the first time in nearly two decades, we're DOUBLING the amount — from $5,000 to up to $10,000 per artist!
Deadlines are approaching fast so don't wait. Go to nyc.gov/artistgrants to apply today!
George W. retweeted
Sen. @ElissaSlotkin: The authoritarian playbook is very clear. When you're at risk of losing, you either A, make up a threat that only you can protect people from, or B, find a way for federal law enforcement or the military to seize ballots or voting machines. In Hungary, Orbán used Plan A. In the run up to election day, we need to be alert and ready. If you hear in the next 34 days that there is a new security threat that you've never heard of, that somehow requires federal law enforcement or the military and not local police, an alarm bell should go off in your brain. Do not let him get away with that.
Well said - and very much agreed
I was encouraged this week to see the leaders of the frontier labs agree on the need for them to slow down the pace of AI development. Given the stakes, it’s a good and necessary first step.
But I’m even more encouraged by the growing recognition that how this powerful new technology develops should be at the center of our public debate.
I’ve been watching the progress on AI for over a decade now, and one thing that’s clear to me is that the potential impact of this technology is not overhyped. It’s also moving at lightning speed – and even faster than those who are engineering it can keep up with.
I’m not an AI accelerationist who believes it will lead to some techno-utopia, and I’m not a doomer who thinks it will inevitably lead to humanity’s destruction.
But whether this technology results in amazing breakthroughs in medicine, energy and education or unleashes huge economic disruptions, greater inequality, and potential catastrophe will depend on the choices that we make right now – choices that should be made not just by the companies involved, but by all of us.
The right has been cutting clips out of context for years now - but this was a particularly cynical one

























