
building @alloco_fi | growth hacker | ex @rss3_ | ex @arbitrum ambassador
Joined January 2021
- Tweets4.5K
- Following1.3K
- Followers2.6K
- Likes5K
Jeff (Prediction Arc) retweeted
Breaking: Tesla's new Roadster hovered and jumped over 5 cars using SpaceX thrusters
$TSLA rose ~3% after hours
• 0-60 mph: under 1s
• Top speed: 230+ mph
• Deposit: $50K, or $250K for Thrust
• Production: 2028
First deposits were taken in 2017
.@gregisenberg 在 SF 跟一群億萬富翁混了 48 小時寫了 21 點觀察,看完有點起雞皮疙瘩
挑幾個我覺得最狠的,中文整理一下 👇
1. 有 data broker 賣企業數據給 AI lab,一週賺 $2M, 不過現在還分不清是起點還是泡沫
2. 飯桌上有人問:「下個月新模型出來,你公司是變好還是變差?」 一半的人沉默了。這大概是現在評估任何 AI 新創最好的一個問題
3. 新的標準是 12 個月做到 $1B 營收,但幾乎沒人在講 retention 為什麼? AI 的錢來得快、走得也快,之後會看到一堆營收很大、留存很爛的故事
4. 電腦正在被重新發明:模型是 CPU,harness 是作業系統,skills/plugins 是 app
5. 大概 12 個月內,會出現看你工作一週,就能不用指令接手你工作的 agent
6. 最強的團隊把模型當成可替換的零件 垂直領域的 agent 其實就四樣東西:產業數據的接口、懂行的人寫的 eval、agent 能碰什麼不能碰什麼的規則、給人審核的乾淨介面 模型大概只佔 20%
7. 軟體越來越容易被複製,所以價值會往數據跑 老牌 SaaS 真正值錢的,可能是裡面多年的客戶數據跟 workflow
8. 很多公司都想把內部數據接給 agent,接了才發現一團亂:同一個客戶五個版本、搜不到的 PDF 幫企業整理數據會是門大生意
9. 有些產品幾乎沒有 UI,因為主要用戶是 agent
10. 下一場戰爭是 memory:最記得你的模型會贏,最聰明的反而沒那麼重要
11. 最想招的人:有品味、會寫 eval 的人, 為什麼? 模型很會生點子,難的是判斷哪個好
12. 現在最缺的是注意力 founder 包公車、買看板、請大牌 DJ 開派對,很有 dotcom 那味 懂這個時代怎麼高效做增長的,全世界可能就 50 個人
跟我之前提的 VC 現在只愛 infra,SF 那邊在講「做 agent 的 building blocks 會贏」,其實是同一件事, 熱錢都在往底層跑。
我聊到產品要開始想 agent first,其實矽谷已經有公司幾乎沒有 UI,因為主要用戶就是 agent
我本來在想交易所唯一還贏傳統金融很多的地方是 accessibility ,跟 UI/UX但如果以後下單的是 agent,UI 這個優勢會被吃掉一半,剩下的只有 accessibility:誰能讓 agent 在鏈上直接買到美股、台股、日股。
最後的最後: 模型本身不是護城河,數據、信任、分發才是
最性感的東西,往往不是最值錢的
boring business wins
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies.
My observations:
1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively.
2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now.
3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention.
4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is.
5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now.
6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text.
They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it.
7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy.
8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies.
Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here.
9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens.
10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity!
11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it.
12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable.
13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think.
14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data.
15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open.
16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down.
17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building?
18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone.
19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good.
20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped.
21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense.
Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era.
Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways.
Happy to be home and locked in.
Until next time!
每次最期待的就是快問快答環節!!!
除了很有趣因為每一回的答案都有可能超出期待之外還可以透過快問快答抓出這些資深前輩對於行業的真實想法
"Binance or OKX" 猜一下 Cheney 怎麼回答這題的lol
“Perps.”
Cheney (15 years in M&A and VC, ex-Goldman) picked perps over TRS in the rapid round. Ten minutes earlier he was explaining why paying 100% funding on OpenAI perps makes no sense.
The other questions he got:
• Bitcoin or ETH
• Singapore or Hong Kong
• OpenAI or Anthropic
• Pre-IPO share or pre-IPO token
• Binance or OKX
He skipped one of the questions; which one is it?
Full episode in the comments 👇
#PreIPO #Anthropic #Tokenization
Jeff (Prediction Arc) retweeted
RWA MARKET WATCH: $47B IN TOKENIZED ASSETS
Tokenized real-world assets have grown into a market spanning Treasury bills, credit funds, gold, equities and other asset classes.
The data:
• $47.0B in RWA market cap
• 6.2M RWA holders
• $3.5B in RWA TVL across DeFi
However, RWA DEX volume was down 86.2% over 30 days, and this contrast raises an important question: is tokenization expanding faster than the trading activity and DeFi integration built around these assets?
While asset growth, holder growth and market liquidity measure different things, more tokenized assets and holders don't automatically translate into deeper markets.
The next phase of RWA adoption will depend on how effectively these assets connect to liquidity, settlement and usable financial products.
Data: @tokenterminal
一起玩嗎各位老鐵
Make GameFi Great Again @Skarly
簡介一下
這遊戲是 RH 上期待最大的農場 @YieldFields_RH
Skarly 是成功保證班
- Wolf Game 核心開發 (ATH 8ETH)
- Onchain Heroes 創始人 (ATH 3ETH)
之前買了個 Ring 結果錯過 mint hero 窗口跟傻子一樣放在那不知道要做什麼 還好在異世界 RH 重生了
通常異世界重生都會跟開掛一樣吧?
感謝 @brucelolzz 勤勤懇懇帶我上車
Jeff (Prediction Arc) retweeted
MARKET MOVERS 📊
Top 5 ETF gainers from the trading session shown:
1. $MRNX +27.64%
2. $WZRD +27.23%
3. $ASTN +21.68%
4. $HIMZ +20.07%
5. $HIMC +19.23%
What stands out?
All five gained more than 19% in a single session. Several of the biggest moves came from ETFs linked to individual stocks, including leveraged products.
Source:@YahooFinance
Jeff (Prediction Arc) retweeted
1011正好过去一年,还会有多少人记得?一个管理过5亿美金老鸟的自白。
2025年10月11日,凌晨早上5点,我的电话持续的传来警报声和短信提示:
保证金率过低
杠杆超过预设的范围
ADL警告
起初我还以为是单个运行策略的警报;但警报接连不断,我赶快拿起电脑,登陆后台超看状况,当时我们对外的投资金额达5亿美金,我赶快打电话叫醒所有人。
那段时间ethena在币安推出了12%年化的活动,很多交易团队为了增加底舱的收益,也开始尝试用usde作为质押物去交易,有些甚至还会循环借贷。当然身边也有很多朋友,自己通过usdt作为保证金,2-3倍杠杆购买usde现货,那时候我记得可以有20%的年化收益。
另外就是币安很早推出的bnsol和wbeth;别的交易所也有相应的产品。因为我们也投资了很多btc本位的策略,这些策略团队为了增加收益,通常会用btc质押借出bnsol和wbeth,这样可以带来一部分额外收益奖励。通常的btc套利策略大概在4%左右,叠加后可以到6%。1011以前很长一段时间,很多市面团队都在做。
我很敬重的一位前辈,之前是在高盛,洲际交易所做风控。多年的经验告诉她,这些标的作为保证金是很危险的,原因很简单,非标准的标的的定价会出现错位,如果用他们作为保证金,风险概率会变很大。所以我们5亿资金只有很少部分会涉及这类资产,我们定在3%的阈值。
我还记得很清楚,有一个大概管理2亿美金的团队1011事件发生的凌晨还在告诉我,为什么他们极力推荐要用usde作为保证金,他说这是一个顺风车的机会,别的团队都在做,问我能不能把这个阈值放宽一些。我给他说:我们再讨论讨论,但大概率不可以,明天告诉他,也一再警告他注意风险。而他帮助别的管理的仓位,usde的比例高达30%。
有些时候,作为管理者,在大家都很fomo的时候,在投资者给你要业绩的时候,在你考虑自己绩效的时候,其实也会动摇:
是不是我们太保守了?
我们没有与时俱进吗?
加密玩的就是创新嘛!
但后面的事情大家也都知道了,去杠杆的过程是多么的残酷,以及对生态造成了长期难以修复的影响。
在市场加杠杆的时候,大部分人是没有感觉的,他们会被超出预期的回报冲昏理智,甚者自欺欺人,骗自己这些超额收益是礼物。
但历史不断的重演,可以看看大空头里Jeremy Irons扮演的John说的话:
It's all just the same thing over and over; we can't help ourselves... There have always been and there always will be the same percentage of winners and losers. Happy foxes and sad sacks. Fat cats and starving dogs in this world. Yeah, there may be more of us today than there's ever been. But the percentages — they stay exactly the same.
老子说:天之道,损有余而补不足;人之道,则不然,损不足以奉有余
人是贪婪的,金融会把这种贪婪用杠杆放大。
这就是金融的规则很重要。那么什么是规则,规则在某种程度上是约束贪婪的,但并不能全部。比起加密世界,传统金融给了很多规矩,但是即便在这些规则下,金融风险事件还是会定期的发生。
像Jeremy Irons说的,我们不能阻止或者减缓金融事件发生,因为这可能也是“人道”的一部分。
那我们能做什么?首先接受这样的残忍,其次是思考自己的位置:
作为投资人
作为监管者
作为产品人
作为个人投资者
作为一个家庭的成员
我应该如何避免成为受害者。
Jeff (Prediction Arc) retweeted
1637:荷兰郁金香泡沫破裂
1797:英美土地投机与金融恐慌
1819:美国第一次重大金融危机
1837:美国经济恐慌,银行停兑、信贷崩塌
1857:美国金融恐慌,铁路投机泡沫破裂
1884:美国金融恐慌,多家金融机构倒闭
1901:美国股市恐慌,铁路公司控制权争夺引发市场震荡
1907:美国银行恐慌,信托机构挤兑
1929:华尔街股灾,大萧条开始
1937:美国经济再次衰退
1974:石油危机引发全球股市暴跌
1987:黑色星期一,道指单日暴跌 22.6%
1992:英镑危机,英国退出欧洲汇率机制
1997:亚洲金融危机,泰铢贬值引发区域性危机
2000:互联网泡沫破裂,科技股大幅下跌
然后是:
2008:全球金融危机,雷曼兄弟破产。
2010:闪电崩盘,算法交易与流动性风险暴露。
2015:中国股市暴跌,杠杆交易遭遇清算。
2020:疫情冲击,全球市场剧烈震荡。
2022:加密市场崩盘,Terra、三箭资本、FTX 接连倒下。
2023:美国地区银行危机,硅谷银行倒闭。
2024:日元套利交易平仓,引发全球市场剧烈波动。
下一次是什么?
不同的时代,不同的资产,不同的故事。
但背后的东西似乎从未改变:
贪婪、杠杆、过度自信,以及流动性枯竭时的集体恐慌。
当我们把 传统资产敞口搬到链上,用加密设施,永续合约和杠杆构建 新型ETFT @alloco_fi 时,有一个问题值得反复思考:
创新改变了什么?但它真的改变了风险如何发生吗?
又幹回老本行了,開始做 podcast啦
平常在 timeline 上看大佬,看到的都是結論
坐下來聊一個小時,我能看到他怎麼走到這個結論的,中間繞過哪些彎(坑),哪些點是他現在也還不確定的,這些都特別有趣也非常珍貴
這集的 Cheney,15 年 M&A 跟 VC,前高盛PE,後來自己開了一家做銀行 AI 的公司做了十年, 是傳金很資深的前輩
幾個聊完之後的收穫:
1/ Pre-IPO 的貨到底從哪來?
答案很不性感,就是 VC 的 pro-rata 跟那個 1.5 級市場,中間一堆中介,一單要三方到齊,然後費用高到離譜
所以你在鏈上看到的 pre-IPO,上游是這樣一條鏈
2/ OpenAI 跟 Anthropic 的 perp,年化 funding 跑超過 100%是你等於用兩倍價格在拿這個敞口
我自己的理解是,這個數字本身就是訊號,代表想要這個敞口的人遠多於拿得到現貨的人
付得起這個 funding 的,要嘛不知道自己在付什麼,要嘛就是真的拿不到貨
3/ perp 有兩個用處,提前退出,還有價格發現
這跟上一集 Robert 講 TRS 的邏輯其實是接起來的,鏈上的人要的是經濟價值,工具是什麼沒那麼重要
4/ Anthropic 2 兆估值還有沒有空間?
Cheney 的框架是 10 兆的白領 GDP 對 1000 億 ARR,現在在 Cisco 階段,電商還沒開始
信不信是一回事,至少這是一個可以被驗證的 thesis,比「AI 很大」精確多了
做podcast的收穫是,有時候是認知被整個拉高一層,有時候是去驗證自己的想法
有興趣的可以關注 @alloco_fi we're pushing the frontier of RWAFi
🎧 RWACast Ep.2: Is AI Pre-IPO Still Worth It at $2 Trillion?
“We get in early at a billion or two valuation of a unicorn. When it hits 10 billion, it’s still 10X.”
This week on RWACast, we sat down with Cheney (15 years in M&A and VC, ex-Goldman, ran an AI company for banks for a decade) to talk about where pre-IPO deals actually come from, why perp funding rates on OpenAI and Anthropic are running over 100% a year, and the Zoom call where the counterparty showed up as a cartoon.
If you’re paying 100% funding to hold a pre-IPO perp, you should probably watch this episode.
🎙 w/ @gdegen
🧵 Episode Timeline:
00:00 Intro
00:17 Cheney’s background: Goldman, M&A, VC, unicorn deals
00:45 Anthropic at $2T: is there still room for retail?
01:21 The AGI bet: $10T of white-collar GDP vs $100B ARR
03:11 Where pre-IPO deals come from: VC pro-rata and the 1.5 market
04:34 The cartoon avatar on Zoom
05:19 Perps vs spot: 100%+ funding rate means paying double
07:31 Would he hedge with perps? Why he holds full exposure
08:16 What perps are actually good for: early exit and price indication
09:03 Only OpenAI and Anthropic? What comes after LLMs
11:06 Cisco then e-commerce: AI is at stage one
12:22 How a deal gets done: the three-party rule and crazy fees
13:37 Using AI for due diligence
14:04 Pre-IPO in five years
14:57 Rapid round: BTC or ETH, SG or HK, TRS or perp, share or token
16:40 AI or biotech
16:59 Binance or OKX
Everything mentioned in this podcast is not financial advice. Please do your own research.
Full episode in the comments 👇
隨手記一下這次新加坡 TOKEN2049 的一些 takeaways:
1/ VC 不是沒錢,是錢開始往別的地方去了
這次跟幾家聊下來, 錢都還在, 但頭部幾家已經把重心挪到非 crypto 的項目
2/ VC 現在最愛 infra
邏輯其實很簡單: 區塊鏈本質是技術, 技術本來就不應該很有趣
crypto 應該要很無聊,而且就該一直無聊下去
3/ @Polymarket 的空投內幕
參加了 polymarket private dinner 聽到的版本是: 中途插了 ICE 那筆投資, 整個空投計畫被迫延後, 重新思考
目前還是有在考慮, 最快明年, 但已經不是他們的首要考量了... 還在嚕的朋友得掂量一下
4/ 交易所全部都在轉型
方向很一致:美股、傳統金融, 把 TradFi 那套搬上鏈, 再加一點創新, 現在交易所都在趕著拿牌照上資產
listing 相關的部門可能會面臨大裁員, 畢竟現在已經沒有那麼多 crypto native 項目可以上了
5/ 今年遇到的團隊, 還活著的基本都轉型了
不是做 RWA、AI,就是做交易相關的 crypto
機會還在, 但幾乎都在往美國、往傳統市場靠
除非你有很硬的場景,比如非洲的支付、東南亞的美股購買等等現在的項目得要有很強的應用場景以及現金流
6/ 交易所未來的對手是傳統金融的交易所
這是幣圈少數還贏、而且贏很多的地方: accessibility 跟 UI/UX
傳統金融的 app 大部分都太難用了
accessibility 講白一點, 就是在鏈上可以買到其他國家的股票, 現在在 @Bitget_zh @bitget 已經可以買到日股
台股最近也非常強 imagine 台股、日股、韓股全部都在鏈上, 這是個很大的機會 (不過合規也是個大問題)
@alloco_fi 最近在做的事情也正在風口上: 準備推 onchain ETF 跟 pre-IPO
pre-IPO 水很深, 但有機會
onchain ETF 的優勢在於上鏈之後成本可以壓到幾乎零
這次跟不少傳統金融的高管以及行業裡的大佬聊過, 大家都覺得這個方向是對的, 大家可以期待一下
7/ AI 會比我們想的來得更快
這個都講爛了但我覺得大部分人還沒意識到多快, 現在做產品的時候,真的要開始考慮 agent first
以後用你產品的, 可能不是人
8/ Crypto 本來就該是個無聊的產業
它就是金融系統的一部分, finance 2.0 or whatever 總之就是一個大體系的一個小部分, 接受這件事之後, 反而比較看得清楚下一步要往哪走
幣圈這輪的變動很大, 這次 token 除了 @RaveDAO 基本上沒有超過 12點的活動, 你要說在走下坡好像也不大對, 畢竟是有pmf的
只是這個pmf比我們前幾輪想像要小太多了…
以上是這次新加坡的觀後感, 各位老闆這次有什麼心得?
Jeff (Prediction Arc) retweeted
"A pre-IPO token can be three things: the actual shares, a fund that holds them, or just a promise. The platform's job is to tell you which one you're buying."
Most pre-IPO tokens onchain don't come with that answer. Robert of Tiantu Asset Management HK (SFC Type 9, ex-ISI) explains why it matters more than the price:
• Why $10M still doesn't get you a vote at Anthropic
• Why the upside is all you're really after, and that's fine
• Which of the three structures can actually be enforced
Full episode in the comments👇
#PreIPO #Anthropic #Tokenization
Jeff (Prediction Arc) retweeted
"Legal ownership just makes you feel more at ease. That's all it does."
In this clip, Robert, Executive Director of Tiantu Capital (SFC Type 9 licensed, 10+ years in private markets) breaks down what you actually trade off in each market.
- Is "I want real shares" a rational demand or just a comfort blanket?
- What do you give up when you insist on legal ownership in the middle market?
- Why does a total return swap(TRS) already answer this?
Full episode in the comments 👇
#PreIPO #Anthropic #Tokenization
這幾天在新加坡見了幾個做 pre-IPO 的傳統金融大佬,過手的錢都是億級的
聊完發現這行水比我理解的深,份額從哪層流出來、中間過幾手、賣的人有沒有權利賣
剛好 @Kristian_cy 錄了一集跟天圖的 Robert 把整條鏈條講了一遍
有買過 pre-IPO token 的,建議可以重點去聽一下 23 分鐘那段
🎧 RWACast Ep.1: Pre-IPO Onchain: What You're Actually Holding When You Buy a Pre-IPO Token
"Some of them buy real shares. Some hold fund units. And some have nothing at all. They just make you a promise."
This week on RWACast, we sat down with Robert, Executive Director at Tiantu Asset Management HK (SFC Type 9, ex-ISI), to unpack how the pre-IPO allocation market really works, and why most onchain buyers can't tell which of the three kinds of pre-IPO tokens they own.
If you've bought a pre-IPO token, or you're about to, you shouldn't miss this episode.
🎙 w/ @Kristian_cy
Mandarin with English subtitles.
🧵 Episode Timeline:
00:00 Welcome to RWACast with Robert, Tiantu Asset Management HK
00:27 Robert's background: ISI, Evercore, Tiantu
04:17 Where pre-IPO returns come from: access first, price second
08:01 How a star deal flows from the cap table down to the market
13:50 When secondary beats primary: $8B round vs $5.5B employee shares
15:31 Where deals break: structure and hidden fees, rarely valuation
22:20 Economic exposure vs legal ownership, and the TRS nobody notices
28:47 Three kinds of pre-IPO tokens: real shares, fund units, or a promise
32:24 Can a company block a token of its own shares?
37:25 What's the fair price: last round, secondary, broker quote, perp
43:40 Conflict of interest: one platform doing everything, no SEC
47:31 The unsolved problem: distribution
50:04 CFIUS, SpaceX excluding China
59:31 Moving tokenization earlier: Anthropic from under $10B to $1T+
1:07:56 Hong Kong: regulatory innovation and the sandbox window
1:15:34 Final thoughts: platforms have to be the referee
Full episode in the comments 👇
Jeff (Prediction Arc) retweeted
"Even with $10 million, you're not speaking at Anthropic's shareholder meeting."
Pre-IPO shares are trading onchain at wildly different prices. Most buyers don't know what they're actually holding.
Robert of Tiantu Capital HK (SFC Type 9, ex-ISI) joins @Kristian_cy to break down:
• What is the pre-IPO business, really?
• How do people make money in it?
• How is crypto doing pre-IPO right now?
RWAcast Ep.1 drops next week 🎧
面基大會 誰會去TOKEN新加坡 let's meet up
need alpha
Singapore, we're coming. 🇸🇬
Alloco is heading to @token2049 Singapore.
Our team @gulugggulu, @Kristian_cy, and @GDegen will be there October 5-9.
If you'd like to learn more about the future of onchain ETFs & pre-IPO, come say hi.
























