$ICP's Price In Bull Market Peak - Your Guess?

internet-computer:native doesn’t need more noise. It needs a weekly close above $3.60–$3.70. That single print flips the multi-month range into expansion mode and opens the door for the strongest move this cycle.

When internet-computer:native is top 3, the same accounts that spent years calling it vaporware, a VC dump, and a dead chain will look you dead in the eye and say “it was obvious.” It wasn’t obvious to you. You FUD’d the tech, the team, the tokenomics, and the vision while the network kept shipping. Don’t rewrite history after the fact. We have screenshots.

The internet computer is live. The market just hasn’t priced a real world computer yet. $ICP is still cheap relative to what it already ships. That doesn’t stay true forever. The Prive will match it capabilities no doubt… #FullSend 🚀

soonlaunchpad.fun looks clean. Who built this? Launch → mine with rigs → auto-lists on ICPSwap with locked LP. No team allocation. If people actually use it, this could be interesting for the $ICP network.

This is false and misleading. NEAR’s quantum-safe signing only protects the NEAR account keys. It does not make your actual Bitcoin or Ethereum quantum-resistant. The underlying chains still use vulnerable cryptography, and the cross-chain control layer isn’t fully post-quantum either.

Our tokens are quantum-proof. The bridges, the oracles, the liquidity, the governance, the actual money-making features, and the team’s Multisig on MetaMask are still proudly pre-quantum, but the whitepaper says we’re ready.

Seeing a lot of new $ICP minted lately? It’s expected. Maturity modulation is currently at the top of its range (102 ICP per 100 maturity). The mechanism rewards stakers who disburse when the recent ICP/cycles trend has been strong and penalizes them when it’s weak. High modulation = stronger incentive to convert maturity into liquid ICP. This is how the system is supposed to work.

Put internet-computer:native at the top of the list and leave a blank under it. The side chains of big tech are not peers. They are the distraction. Real cypherpunk ideology does not rent its base layer.

Cloud engines upgraded. Chain-key signatures 10x. Motoko now talks to nine AI agent stacks. $ICP is building the computer. Price is still pricing the meme.

Mock the chart all you want. Your chain’s greatest historical feature was the restart button.

Pure cope. NEAR sold Intents as bridgeless. “No bridging” is still on the site. The $1B weeks and the volume headlines were all NEAR, all the founders, all the glory. Then the rail breaks and suddenly it is “not NEAR, just a bridge.” Their own docs list Omni, POA, and HOT Bridge as how Intents moves funds. The chains they froze are the HOT Bridge route. Their own post says the bug was in that deposit path interacting with the NEAR Intents contract, and they patched the contract side. The money left the HOT Bridge treasury they publish. You do not get to brand the bridge out of the product on the way up and blame the bridge the second it gets drained. Making users whole is the minimum, not a defense.

This isn’t a bounce. This is internet-computer:native still asleep. Once people actually look at what it can do the chart is going to look criminal. Still ignored. Still early. Bags heavy.