Pinned Tweet
This is the Twitter account for the Friction YouTube channel, where we host discussions with professional philosophers! Check it out! youtube.com/FrictionPhilosop…
I have written an extensive post covering the Eucharistic miracle of Lanciano. Check it out! fric.substack.com/p/the-mira…
Interview with Henry Taylor on natural kinds and the science of perception! youtu.be/hepgIRB9lC8
Interview with Justin Mooney on "phasalism" and various issues related to persistence and identity! youtu.be/RiiicNzlDkM
Interview with David Papineau on physicalism and various issues in the philosophy of mind! youtu.be/pDAXTRMmkDs
How can we account for the incredible harmony between certain theistic hypotheses and the data they were largely developed to explain (i.e., the existence of us and our relation to the world)? More ink needs to be spilled on this post haste
What if introspection isn’t an inner eye watching your own mind, but simply what rationality requires of you? Interview with Daniel Stoljar! youtu.be/9nCOVOlNlHU
What if the point of punitive damages isn’t just to punish wrongdoers, but to tell victims their dignity actually counts? Interview with Maria Alles! youtu.be/o4RE3uoJbsE
What if the flow of time is an illusion, and the past, present, and future all exist together right now? Interview with Kristie Miller! youtu.be/VfUBU_WXh8I
What if only the present moment exists, and everything you call the past or the future is, strictly speaking, nothing at all? Interview with Mark Balaguer! youtu.be/g4KhAmFL6t4
About to go live with Graham Oppy to review the debate between Alex Malpass and William Lane Craig. Come check it out! youtube.com/live/MXA0XxnXwLs
Myself, Lance Bush, and @askyourself92 reviewed the recent debate on moral realism between Lance Bush and David Enoch. Premiering now, check it out! youtu.be/enOid3xg9Is
In this in-depth interview, Mark Balaguer shows how presentists can respond to various challenges. Check it out! youtu.be/g4KhAmFL6t4
In this post, I provide a careful analysis and argument regarding the red/blue button dilemma. What's the right answer? Check it out!! fric.substack.com/p/red-or-b…
In almost all realistic cases, pressing red is uniquely rational. I'm going to write a blog post later to explain why.
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
42%Red
58%Blue
98,539 votes • Final resultsIn this episode, Matt Duncan discusses "acquaintance". What is it? What's required for something to be "present to mind", and how is that significant? Check it out! youtu.be/P_Odt7Mzu-4
In this episode, Rivka Weinberg discusses meaning. What is the meaning of life? What are the different sorts of meaning? Is ultimate meaning even possible? Check it out! youtu.be/6CLSJy9f9PQ
In this episode, Jay Garfield discusses his naturalist approach to normativity. What are norms, ethics? What did Hume get right? Check it out! youtu.be/OyKoiDTWSnY




