Fred Flint retweeted
Slotkin, Goodlander and other seditionists posted the No Kings video on October 17, 2025. The purpose was to portray President Trump as a dictator. The format is the same as the later Call to Insurrection video. No Kings was financed by Soros, Hoffman and other Dark Money groups with the purpose of deposing President Trump. That's how they always start the Color Revolutions: with "protests" to overthrow the leader.
Slotkin then spoke at the Brookings on October 29, 2025, predicting an incident involving National Guard. Brookings is Hillary, Talbott (Intel-community connected Clinton buddy), Goodlander's husband and Hillary's advisor Jake Sullivan. Slotkin is of course CIA, "endorsed" by John Brennan and co.
Sullivan and Goodlander are friends with Bill Burns who attended their wedding. Sullivan is the organizer, Goodlander is the legal "brains" behind the insurrection, as an aide to AG Garland, she effectively ran Biden's DoJ.
Brookings is where the co-conspirators all meet and agree on the strategy. They did exactly the same with Russiagate, etc.
After proclaiming the democratically-elected President a "dictator", and organizing "protests", the next step in the Color Revolution playbook is to dehumanize law-enforcement so that when much bigger "protests" take place, it would be "justified" to attack them.
The seditionists, with help of their co-conspirators in the media, would then make any violence President Trump's fault. That was one of the purposes of Slotkin's speech at Brookings.
On November 18, 2025, the Sedious Six posted their Call to Insurrection video. The purpose was to gain control over the military and the Intelligence Community.
Color Revolution playbook.
Fred Flint retweeted
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 1: THE PLAN 🚨
I am working on gathering all the documents.
Now, here's something to understand about the "democracy" and protest ecosystem: almost nobody knows the 'grand plan' so to speak. They simply agree to play a role.
For example, 99% of people breaking stuff on the streets believe they're doing it out of an organic uprising. They don't see that the police have been ordered to stand down. They don't see that legal services have already been arranged for them. They don't see that foundations are paying for their bonds.
Similarly here, governors aren't participating in a pact to destroy the Constitution. Governors simply have agreed to push back on the Insurrection Act. The effect is the same: the governors end up playing a role in a grander plan.
I call this "shared epistemology" in my book Unelected. Motivations differ, people rarely agree to the big evil supervillain framing, but incentives all converge in the same end goal.
No Kings might not agree to explicitly tear down the Constitution, but they nonetheless work with DSA and will turn out millions of people if the right phone call is put in.
Here is one articulation of the plan - and crucially, since then, they have put many NGOs in their places to execute their proper role at all levels when the time is right.
Many more coming.
Fred Flint retweeted
This is the funniest announcement I've seen in weeks:
"The European Union is working toward fast-track antitrust approval for a satellite joint venture between Leonardo SpA, Airbus SE, and Thales SA, which is positioned as Europe's response to SpaceX"
We know pretty much how this is going to go. With a vast wheezing and clanking of bureaucratic gears, the consortium be approved. It will provide extremely comfortable livings for a vast horde of bureaucrats, consultants, and hangers-on. White papers and bold, forward-looking plans will issue like confetti.
After approximately a decade of extremely expensive grinding, the consortium will have approximately the productive output of a wet fart.
The damage for SpaceX is massive
"The European Union is working toward fast-track antitrust approval for a satellite joint venture between Leonardo SpA, Airbus SE, and Thales SA, which is positioned as Europe's response to SpaceX"
The actions of the 🇺🇸 US administration have consequences.
Recent reports from 4 sources confirm that both Elon and Trump supported the restrictions of Starshield, which confirms my earlier posts stating that SpaceX is involved and part of it.
The Telegraph on Oct. 16 reported that it was Musk who proposed the speed cap to Trump — and Trump "agreed," one source said.
That sounds very likely to what really had happened including Elons denial to have any responsibility (half true) and Trumps lie which is just one more of the many he spreads every day. finance.yahoo.com/economy/po…
Fred Flint retweeted
URGENT; Many people don’t know the difference between vote fraud and election fraud. In a word, the issue is SCALE. Altering votes is a crime but it may not directly change the outcome of an election. Election fraud absolutely changes the outcome of an election - that is the purpose. Here’s basically how they do it:
BEFORE the election:
1) It starts with a census that counts illegals present in the country. States with illegal populations get more seats in Congress than they’re legally entitled to have because those seats are based on an illegal population & not American citizens. (Constitutional violation)
2) GHOST VOTERS: Voter rolls are filled with dead people, non-citizens, people who’ve moved - all that is true. The voter rolls are completely corrupt. But there is something FAR MORE SINISTER on these rolls and it is this: ghost voters. This occurs in two ways: one is where a there are multiple voters with the same registration number & this is known as duplicate voters. But far more damaging is where a single voter has multiple voter registration numbers assigned to their name. Why is that worse than duplicate voters? Again because of scale. One voter can have 5 or 10 or 20 or 30 voter ID numbers assigned to their name and these voters are all phantoms. They do not exist but they all vote. How? By machine.
And here is the WORST part: when they say voter rolls have been purged/removed they do not mean actually REMOVED. The truth is they just check a box that SAYS purged/removed. So guess what that means? Anyone with access can remove the check from that box & bring those voters right back. So they are like zombies who never actually die. This means every single voter roll we have can have every single purged voter restored with an algorithm that covers its tracks so no one can see it or knows it is there. Not that it matters if you never have access to the servers to look for these things. And since most people do not speak code, they are clueless anyway.
I learned this from Dr Andrew Paquette who is a mathematical genius & he does speak code. He told me it took him TWO YEARS to break that algorithm. That is how difficult this is to detect.
3) Mail in ballots. So many ways to cheat: Mailed to non-citizens, multiple ballots mailed to the same address (so one address can receive 50 mail-in ballots or more), fraudulently filled out by paid operatives, mailed after the steal to compensate for unexpected same day voting results etc.
4) **THIS IS THE ONE YOU MAY NOT BE AWARE OF BUT SO IMPORTANT: They front load voting machines with algorithms to flip votes based on voting data collected in advance. That’s why the voting machine companies so “kindly” go around doing software updates in the counties & states where the fix is in. They use the data from early voting, mail-in ballots, past elections etc and estimate what the turnout will be and how much they need to chest. Then they write that into an algorithm built into the software that is designed to be completely undetectable and then they insert it into the machines BEFORE the polls open. So the SOFTWARE IS RIGGED IN ADVANCE.
5) HARDWARE in the machines. Also rigged in advance. in spite of what election officials and voting machine companies say, the machines are often manufactured in China & fitted with backdoors. They may say Taiwan but they come first from China and then go to Taiwan. And in addition to any malware/back doors the Chinese have the opportunity to fit inside them, they have multiple different ways to connects to the internet if needed/desired. Modems are just one way and there are plenty of those in many machines, across all the voting machine companies.
THE STEAL: DURING THE ELECTION - below.
9
Fred Flint retweeted
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Fred Flint retweeted
The difference is a similar man here in Florida or in Texas or other places would simply have shot those terrorists to death. That's exactly what happens to loot is here in Florida and our Sheriff's have warned those who wish to loot that they will be shot dead by the public. That's how it works here
Fred Flint retweeted
I honestly do not understand how any American who is not already a literal Communist or a literal Jihadist could vote Democrat after hearing what Slotkin said below.
This is LITERALLY totalitarianism. It's not the fake "fascism" the Left likes to accuse the Right of, it is the REAL THING.
Undeniably.
Irrefutably.
This is a sitting member of Congress who was in the CIA saying that dissent from what she believes will result in imprisonment.
This is straight out of Solzhenitsyn. Straight out of Orwell. This is something an early Nazi would have said in 1932 under the Weimar Republic.
Please please PLEASE share her words with everyone you know. The Democrat/Media Complex will try to bury this. It is up to us on social media, on blogs and via texts and emails to get the word out.
The only way to stop these monsters is to make sure that voters who don't really keep up on politics understand the actual threat, see it with their own eyes and hear it with their own ears.
Please. Spread the word to anyone who will listen. And even those who won't listen.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Fred Flint retweeted
Obama's FBI Director Jim Comey oversaw an attempted coup against a duly elected President.
NY AG Tish James campaigned in 2018 on going after President Trump, then persecuted him and his family.
And Obama's lawfare allies and friendly judges made sure Comey and James escaped accountability.
Now he lectures us about 'selectively targeting' political opponents?
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
Fred Flint retweeted
Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D., Mich.) just gave an interview where she said the quiet part out loud. She intends to unleash a slew of investigations to deter young people from even considering supporting the Administration … if they know what is good for them. jonathanturley.org/2026/10/1…
Fred Flint retweeted
Seditious Six member promotes jailing political opponents to achieve a one-party state.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Fred Flint retweeted
These people are Soviets and they want all of us dead. They can never be allowed to control government ever again.
Fred Flint retweeted
Tonight, France burned. America, you should be watching very carefully.
Today, October 17, 2026, more than half a million people marched across France against the cost of living. By 8pm, around 400 had been arrested. In Paris, police turned water cannons on the crowds at Place de la République, and one march was stopped 150 meters from the Élysée Palace. Of the 195 people arrested in the capital by the afternoon, only one actually lived in Paris. Mobs forced their way into the city halls of Marseille and Lille. In Lyon, a tourism office was set on fire. In Rennes, barricades burned. Near Limoges, a highway was blocked and police cars were torched.
And then came Limoges.
A crowd of very young people stormed the city hall, a protected historic monument built in the 1880s. They flipped police cars in front of it and set them ablaze, then set the building itself on fire. The flames took the roof, the wedding hall, and the civil registry, the office that records every birth, every marriage, every death in the city. Tonight, the bell tower that has crowned Limoges for nearly 150 years collapsed.
The mayor's response: "It's a monument that is burning, not the Republic."
That is the problem in one sentence. Our leaders still think words can put out fires.
None of this came out of nowhere. For twenty years, the French political class has excused everything. Every riot was "anger." Every burned car was a "social symptom." Every attack on police was "a reaction to provocation." And the hard left, La France Insoumise, which officially backed today's mobilization, built its electoral machine on an alliance with political Islamism: refusing to condemn, refusing to name, trading secularism and public order for votes. In France we have a word for it. Islamo-gauchisme. Islamo-leftism.
Tonight you saw where that culture of excuse ends. A country where a mob can burn down a town hall, and the state arrives after the roof has already fallen in.
My dear American friends,
I say this with love, as someone who has lived among you and owes you a great deal: your midterms are on November 3rd. And the same alliance is growing inside your Democratic Party. The same far-left wing that treats disorder as protest and police as the enemy. The same activists who refuse to draw a line between legitimate dissent and those who openly despise the West. The same politicians who think tolerance means tolerating everything, including the people who want to burn it down.
It always starts with excuses. Then comes impunity. Then come the flames.
Same causes, same effects. If you create the conditions we created, you will get exactly what we got tonight.
France was the country of the Enlightenment, of cathedrals and town halls that stood for centuries. Tonight, one of them collapsed live on social media while the government called for calm.
My dear American friends, the only advantage you have over us is that you've been warned.
Vote like your city hall depends on it. Because one day, it will.
Fred Flint retweeted
You have to have a heart of stone not to laugh
Fred Flint retweeted
Hi Jessica, I’ve never had the pleasure of meeting you in person but I can certainly form an opinion of you based on your hallucinatory takes. My goal is to not rile up others but to warn clear-thinking people about your suicidal mindset. Cheers.
Fred Flint retweeted
"I don't want flying cars. I want raw nature and real human connection."
Brother…
YOU are CURRENTLY SELLING $50 worth of protein bars that were not foraged, not hunted, and not hand-pressed by a village elder at dawn but manufactured in a FACILITY on a production line powered by the electrical grid, sealed in plastic made from petroleum pumped out of the earth by giant drills, boxed, labeled, barcoded, and scanned into an inventory system running on servers cooled by industrial AC units humming 24/7, then loaded onto a DIESEL TRUCK that hauls them down an interstate bulldozed straight through the exact wilderness you want to get lost in (you will not get lost, there is a Buc-ee's), dumped into a sorting hub full of conveyor belts and robotic arms and lasers, thrown onto ANOTHER truck, handed to a mail carrier idling in a van in a cul-de-sac, and dropped on a porch in a cardboard box that gets ripped open in four seconds and tossed in the recycling, all so someone can eat a bar they bought on a phone with a credit card processed in 0.3 seconds by a bank mainframe and then YOU logged on to tell the rest of us technology doesn't make anyone happy, when it's clearly making YOU very happy, and the second someone figures out drone delivery you'll be first in line with your logo on the propellers, so no, you're not a troglodyte, because troglodytes never offered free shipping on orders over $75.
I don't want flying cars.
I want rivers and ocean I can swim in with friends.
I want food that isn't full of toxic chemicals and clean soil to grow it in.
I want raw nature and wilderness and places on the earth I can get lost without seeing another human.
I want air that isn't "geoengineered" and polluted.
Science is cool. Technological advancement is cool, but I don't think this makes us happier as humans.
Real human connection and clean, natural food lead to happiness. This I know. Flying cars? I'm not sure.
Maybe I am a troglodyte...
Fred Flint retweeted
What they simulated on this statue's eyes is also what the Bataclan terrorists did to countless victims 10 years ago.
Believe them when they tell you who they are.
Fred Flint retweeted
This is stunning a sitting U.S. senator is saying this out loud.
She is quite explicitly advocating for prosecutions to scare young people away from politics.
@ElissaSlotkin is truly a danger to democracy--a democracy she pretends she's protecting.
This is a fascist tactic.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Fred Flint retweeted
Am one.
There are countless people who have suffered the same fate as David. But he was one of the most prominent biologists in the country at the time and held one of the most coveted positions at MIT. His case got attention after MIT publicized it, exposing him to worldwide condemnation over allegations of sexual misconduct.
Yes, Ackman took up his case, but David was also one of the few who chose to fight it out and go the distance in a five-year court battle. Most don’t have the stomach for that. Very few choose to fight, and those who do are labeled troublemakers, with a shadow cast over them in perpetuity.
I know so many people this has happened to, and they remain unemployed for years. The older ones typically retire and drop out of the spotlight. I even know someone who went through 25 years of medical and doctoral training, only to end up coaching tennis in his later years.
Fred Flint retweeted
What is said is factually accurate. However, what's missing is a person having followed the Sean Hannity pattern for years.
If you start from the perspective that Hannity operates entirely for the best interests of the Washington DC 'illusion of choice' system, meaning he's entirely controlled, then what Hannity does makes sense.
Just like Alex Jones became compromised over the $$$$ lawsuit against him, Sean Hannity's attack vector opened up when he started having an affair with Ainsley Earhardt and they both desperately needed to keep it hidden. The leverage was large, and ultimately the massive divorce settlement, again $$$$, compromised him completely.
Hannity protects the DC apparatus. That's the context for Hannity's passive aggressive targeting of Zachariah.
There are a LOT of Sean Hannity types around this administration.
I’ve seen a lot of people pushing the narrative that Trump sent @seanhannity in to “destroy” Katie Zachariah on national television, or that Susie Wiles deliberately set up the interview to sabotage her.
But did we watch the same interview?
Below are Hannity’s questions, word for word. Pretty fair questions about her background, credentials, and first press briefing. Nothing particularly difficult or out of bounds.
An interview going badly doesn’t automatically mean it was a coordinated hit job.
1. Katie, this is a big interview for you. You had your first moment as press secretary. It's been widely panned. I'm sure you're aware. It only lasted 14 minutes. You took three questions.
Questions about your legal background, calling yourself a lawyer. You went to Pepperdine but did not pass the bar exam, correct?
2. What happened? How did you feel it went personally?
3. Am I hearing that you think the staff should have prepped you better?
4. I saw you were on with Jack Posobiec earlier tonight. You called it a conspiracy theory as it relates to the issue of being a lawyer.
You did go to Pepperdine. It's a good school, no doubt about it. You took the bar exam, but you didn't pass the bar exam, correct?
5. Did you ever take it a second time?
6. I want to ask you specifically. I know that part of the story. You did do that. Did you ever take it a second time or third time?
7. So you said you consulted with many people, and they advised you it was okay to call yourself a lawyer but not an attorney, correct?
8. Look, that is a very tough room. I've known a lot of press secretaries over the years. Following on the heels of Karoline Leavitt is very tough. Speaking for Donald Trump makes everything difficult.
And why not say, "I took the bar and didn't pass it"? Why get in this drawn-out definition of an attorney and a lawyer? Why didn't you just say, "I never practiced law"?
9. All right. Why only three questions in 14 minutes, and what might you do differently going forward?
10. Can I give you some unsolicited advice? That will never be a friendly room to you.