@Polymarket MAXI ❤️ ex-ceo @BrainLabsVC

Polymarket
Joined April 2021
Polymarket has become a safe haven. The number of users has grown by 10% to 1.3 million. The volume on local exchanges is high, and uptime is 99.9%. Polymarket has become a place where you don't have to guess, but bet on reality: for example, the president's tweet. Polymarket works differently. Trading on CEX is an attempt to guess the market. Trading on Polymarket is an opportunity to profit from any outcome. 📉 On CEX: retail losses of $20 billion. 📈 On Polymarket: zero liquidations, just a redistribution between “Yes” and “No.” Different strategies, different outcomes. Use @Polymarket @PolymarketTrade
4
2
63
7,405
Seeker FDV + 30% on polymarket Market: polymarket.com/event/seeker-… Mexc pre-market - $0.02 Polymarket - $0.01 - $0.02 Two options 100M - YES + 30% 100M - NO + 120% I would bet on 100m YES Since the pre-market valuation is adequate and there will be a listing on Coinbase.
3
7
340
FOGO - REKT The project has had two rounds so far: > the first - from unknowns, valued at ~$100 million > echo community round - also ~$100 million The token is currently trading on HL at a valuation of ~$1.1 billion. The question is simple: has everyone there finally gone mad? IMO yes. But there is a nuance Listing on HL pre-market allows the project to earn money even BEFORE its normal release. And every time there is a pre-market on HL, it's a stick up. Short sellers have always been shaved there. Just remember Plasma. Therefore, no one in their right mind will short - the chart is growing. Numbers: - pre-market vol: < $100k per day - OI: ~$400k And yet this story is worth more than $1b? Tokenomics fogo.io/blog/introducing-fog…. 40% of tokens will go to TGE Can a project with this structure be worth $1+b? My answer is no if u use your head My bet: < $500 million FDV - and that btw is already a good valuation for such a project
3
19
462
Cuba - how to earn money on polymarket? Markets 1) polymarket.com/event/us-stri… 2) polymarket.com/event/will-th… 3) polymarket.com/event/miguel-… My analysis and review In October 1962, the world narrowly avoided nuclear war when Soviet missiles were discovered in Cuba. That crisis ended in compromise. In January 2026, the Caribbean once again finds itself under the shadow of history - but this time, the script has been reversed. Then, Washington demanded the removal of foreign weapons from its “backyard.” Today, it is Washington that is forcefully reclaiming that backyard, determined to eliminate any external presence. And once again, Cuba stands at the epicenter. What is unfolding is not simply a new round of sanctions. It is a deliberate strategy of economic suffocation. The seizure and disruption of oil shipments mark only the opening move. The objective is not invasion, but collapse from within. Cutting off Venezuelan oil supplies - previously about 35,000 barrels per day - is designed to push Cuba’s already exhausted economy over the edge, trigger widespread blackouts, and intensify an ongoing humanitarian crisis. Havana is preparing for the worst, placing its military on combat readiness. This campaign rests on a resurrected and radicalized Monroe Doctrine, rebranded by the Trump administration as the “Donroe Doctrine.” The concept no longer tolerates even nominal sovereignty in the region. Mexico, Colombia, and especially Cuba are treated not as independent states, but as territories within a zone of enforced control. Cuba, once the site of foreign missile deployments, is the primary target - but the logic extends across the entire hemisphere. This pressure is backed by overwhelming military power. With U.S. debt exceeding $38 trillion, Congress has nevertheless approved an unprecedented $1.5 trillion defense budget. The funds are being poured into the modernization of the nuclear triad, hypersonic strike systems, and the “Golden Dome” missile defense project - an initiative capable of dismantling strategic nuclear parity. The impending expiration of the New START Treaty on February 5, 2026, is not an accident in this context. President Donald Trump has openly dismissed concerns about the treaty’s collapse, instead calling for a “better deal” that would force China into the framework. Russia has already suspended its participation, while China has rejected the demand as fundamentally unrealistic, given the disparity in nuclear arsenals. The result is the effective destruction of the arms control regime and the launch of an uncontrolled three - power arms race. In parallel, the United States is preparing to deploy Typhon ground - based missile systems armed with Tomahawk cruise missiles in Germany, with similar plans reportedly under consideration for Japan. U.S. hypersonic weapons are to be positioned to target Moscow from the United Kingdom, Tehran from Qatar, and Beijing from Guam. Seen through this lens, Cuba is a preemptive strike a test case ahead of a global redeployment of missile systems and a return to nuclear coercion as an instrument of policy. The stakes have risen to a systemic level: the architecture of nuclear security itself is being dismantled. The critical difference from 1962 lies in the absence of diplomacy. There is no search for compromise - only ultimatums. The objective is not merely regime change in Havana, but the construction of a sealed strategic outpost in the heart of the Caribbean. History is repeating itself, but this time one side believes it holds all the cards and can dictate the ending. That belief is reckless, hubristic, and profoundly dangerous.
3
12
339
IRAN - how to make money on polymarket? Markets: polymarket.com/search?_q=ira… US strikes Iran by...? + 60% YES Israel x Iran ceasefire broken by...? + 70% YES Khamenei out as Supreme Leader of Iran by March 31? +132% YES The protests that broke out on December 28 in Tehran’s Grand Bazaar over the collapse of the rial escalated into a political crisis within days. Everything continues to escalate. While the unrest of 2009 and 2022 was suppressed through mass arrests, this time the streets are responding to violence with violence. According to Iranian state media, protesters are armed with firearms and grenades. There are reports of casualties among the security forces: a police officer was shot dead in Malekshahi County, and two officers were killed and around 30 wounded in Lorestan Province. The main slogan — “Neither Gaza nor Lebanon, my life for Iran” — strikes at the very heart of the Islamic Republic’s ideology. People are openly declaring that Iran’s costly foreign policy of supporting its regional allies is the reason for their poverty. Tehran’s opponents have been working with this narrative for a long time, and against the backdrop of suffocating U.S. sanctions and deteriorating living conditions, it has erupted into an uprising. Current events inevitably bring to mind the bloody Arab Spring in Syria. The scenario is familiar: peaceful economic protests, harsh repression, the first victims, radicalization, and a slide toward civil conflict. However, the differences may prove decisive. In Syria, “Bloody Friday” claimed the lives of more than 100 people. In Iran, according to various sources, between 16 and 36 protesters were killed during the first few days. The scale of bloodshed is not yet comparable. The Assad regime almost immediately deployed army units to hold cities. The Iranian authorities, having learned the lessons of the past, are acting more selectively, albeit harshly. The head of the judiciary, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, has already promised: “There will be no leniency for the rioters.” Perhaps the key difference is the unity of the elites during the crisis. In Syria, parts of the military command and political elite defected to the opposition early on. In Tehran, the political and security establishment — including the relatively moderate President Masoud Pezeshkian — is demonstrating unity in the face of the threat. Another important difference is that Iranian society, especially its youth, is far more urbanized, educated, and connected to the outside world through the internet (which the authorities are now attempting to shut down). The slogan “Neither Gaza nor Lebanon, my life for Iran” serves as an explanation of events for an audience that has been bypassing information blockades for years — and this narrative has been building over the long term. This is where a third, external actor enters the picture, capable of detonating an already dangerous situation. U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly stated: “If they start killing people… the United States will strike them very hard.” This is a direct analogy with Libya: in 2011, the West, initially claiming to protect peaceful demonstrators in Benghazi, quickly moved toward military intervention, which ultimately led to the overthrow and killing of Muammar Gaddafi. Now Trump is threatening Iran, and this time it does not appear to be empty rhetoric. Such threats act like acid on the situation. On the one hand, they may encourage protesters by giving them hope for external support. On the other, they allow the Iranian authorities to blame the unrest on “the hand of Washington and Tel Aviv,” thereby consolidating their supporters. In response, an adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Shamkhani, stated: “Any hand that encroaches on Iran’s security will be cut off.” In the event of an American strike, Iran could retaliate against U.S. bases in the region, potentially dragging the entire Middle East into the conflict. Stability in Iran is now hanging by a thread. If the authorities resort to full-scale repression along a Syrian-style scenario, it will result in bloodshed but may suppress the protests. The cost, however, would be the permanent loss of support from a significant portion of the educated urban population — as well as the risk of provoking a direct confrontation with the United States. If the protests expand and the security forces falter (as happened with the Syrian army in several provinces in 2011), the country could slide into a civil war with an unpredictable outcome. Iran is approaching the most dangerous moment in its recent history. The streets are no longer afraid. The authorities are threatening to show no mercy. And the shadows of Gaddafi and Assad are already looming on the horizon. The choices made by Iran’s elites in the coming days will determine the fate not only of their country, but of the entire troubled region. Just use @polymarket
7
18
670
Edgex - new lighter +200% and +20% on polymarket + airdrop Project at the lighter and HL level > Same volumes as lighter > Has a commission and has earned a lot of money > Pocket project Amber Group > 25% on airdrop > Launched $MARU, which has given 2x since launch and is now worth 500m FDV > The only project from perps that has 82% on polymarket with a valuation >1B How to earn? Bet on the project's valuation 1B FDV +20% 2B FDV + 200% HR Follow the link and trade - get points pro.edgex.exchange/referral/… Polymarket event polymarket.com/event/edgex-f… Just use @Polymarket
12
28
1,209
Hedge your home on polymarket Polymarket and Parcl launched Real Estate Prediction Markets Predict home values, exclusively powered by Parcl data The partnership enables users to speculate on regional property price movements using transparent, data-driven benchmarks derived from real-world real estate markets Just use @Polymarket
1
10
172
New Year - New dep In 2026 I want to start with @Polymarket I set myself a goal - to go from $1,000 to $10,000 on Polymarket and launch a challenge My first bet this year is $100 on @opensea FDV above 1B one day after launch. "YES" That's an ez x2 Market: polymarket.com/event/opensea…
7
12
545
Looks like Lighter is distributing tokens At the moment, the odds of an airdrop on @Polymarket this year are 91% What day will the @Lighter_xyz airdrop be? Odds on polymarket 29 DEC - 61% 30 DEC - 12% A wallet created a few minutes ago received more than 1.5 million $LIT tokens. Who is it? An insider? @justinsuntron ?
2
14
907
Lighter TGE 29 DECEMBER The $LIT token launchpad has appeared on the MEXC exchange Ends on December 29 It looks like the TGE will take place on December 29 1 point = $80 Meanwhile, the @Polymarket odds for the "Lighter airdrop by December 31" event are 89% Still an easy 10%?
7
17
1,452
My results for the year on Polymarket I ended the year with a P&L of +$107 A very poor result, considering that at its peak it was several times higher My last bets were extremely unsuccessful. However, this did not prevent me from ending the year at +$100 For me, the best result was a series of successful bets on TI2025 for Dota 2 I managed to increase my deposit from $50 to $500. It took only a week The worst was a series of losses on UFC. When the favorites lost their fights Next year, I plan to set myself a challenge - deposit $1,000 - goal $10,000 I think I can do it JUST USE @Polymarket
7
18
751
Opensea FDV Perhaps one of the most undervalued bets on @Polymarket > The volume is only 917k. > At the same time, people are betting on the safest option - 500m FDV. I don't understand how this project can be worth less than 1b FDV. At the moment, it is literally a DEFI HUB for everyone + NFT marketplace + future perp. Let's not forget that @opensea has earned huge amounts of money in commissions throughout its existence, and while companies were going strong in 2025, they also earned even more money Hence my lack of understanding I'll take a chance and make a few bets 1b - also a safe bet like 500m, but with a higher profit. RR is low + 60% profit. 2b - The risk is higher, but still acceptable. +200% 3b - The riskiest bet, but if the market is favorable, it can work in your favor. + 600% My strategy is simple - 1b - large amount, 2b - medium amount, 3b - small amount. I don't believe that a project of this scale and level will go below 1b FDV.
12
1
22
1,516
US x Venezuela military engagement. +80% on Polymarket! IMO this is a good opportunity to make money. Good RR. There will most likely be no direct war, but we are looking at rules that allow for minor military clashes rather than full-scale invasion. Which I am sure will happen! The main reason lies in North America - Canada. Canada was the main supplier of heavy oil. But it is no longer a simple and reliable solution. Trump's trade war with his northern neighbor, tariffs, and mutual resentment have sharply cooled relations. Canada has made it clear that in response to 10% tariffs on its “black gold” and 25% on other goods, it is considering a complete cessation of energy supplies. This threat is not coming from a tabloid newspaper - it was voiced by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who said that the country is ready to “cut off” electricity to several US states. Considering that the US imports 60% of its oil and 85% of its electricity from Canada, this is not a bluff, but a lever of enormous pressure. There has been a rapid turnaround: oil is flowing to China! While Washington blackmails with tariffs, Ottawa responds in kind. Record shipment rates are being recorded from the port of Vancouver. This is a strategic response: Canada is reducing its dependence on its sole buyer, the US. Thus, American oil companies are also feeling the economic damage from their own tariffs. Trump is trying to forcefully reduce the trade deficit (about $63 billion) and support his producers. But the result is different: instead of concessions, he is getting worsening relations with his main ally and a loss of strategic control. Canada has not broken down. For the first time since the start of the trade war, it has achieved a trade surplus by increasing exports to other countries. America's response is obvious: take Venezuela's resources and reduce its dependence on Canada by continuing the trade war. This is one of the main reasons why Trump will “strangle” Maduro. Just use @Polymarket
7
29
1,940
Will Lighter not launch this year?. +150% An interesting opportunity to beat the market has arisen - we are betting on NO on polymarket If @Lighter_xyz conducts an airdrop, you get your money back. If it does not conduct an airdrop, you win the bet. WIN2WIN Vlad explained that when he previously referred to “Christmas,” he was not referring to Christmas Day itself, but rather to the broader holiday season And the whole idea that the TGE would take place in 2025 was based mainly on Vlad's words. So yes, it seems like a hint that the TGE may take place in 2026 As I said earlier, lighter will most likely not be released this year. There are many factors that point to this. Just use @Polymarket
10
11
445
zerosupercycle dao lfg Changes for the better Stagnation is a swamp - Progress is the sky There is more to come Polymarket is the future Polymarket supercycle Just use @Polymarket
9
18
292
Aztec FDV above 800m one day after launch? My bet - 800m HR The project falls under the current privacy goal The project may enter a favorable bull market It is possible that sale participants will receive a base reward (xxxxx$) The project has significant investment and support from top funds Just Use @Polymarket
11
20
591
MetaMask has integrated Polymarket Welcome aboard - 1-click funding from any EVM token - <5 sec mobile onboarding - Curated, high-quality markets - MetaMask Rewards baked in More and more partnerships, integrations - the world takeover continues Just use @Polymarket
8
23
490
LIGHTER SPOT IS LIVE The chance that @Lighter_xyz will conduct an airdrop this year is 83%. According to polymarket data. Market: polymarket.com/event/lighter… After the launch, there should be an airdrop of the $LIGER token. I believe it should be either this week or next week. An easy 17%? Just use @Polymarket
6
13
561