Most people don't know this about $VRA. The CEO, Mark Firth, spent 8 years as Director and General Counsel AMEA at Prosus Group. Prosus is the 49th most valuable company in the world with a $400B+ market cap. They own ~23% of Tencent, the biggest game publisher on earth with 1.3 billion WeChat users. Firth personally oversaw hundreds of millions in digital advertising investments across the UAE and AMEA region. He left that position to become CEO of $VRA. Now here's what most people miss: Prosus is not known for community management. They're known for silent, long term investments that deliver enormous returns. Mark Firth brings exactly that culture to $VRA. The silence isn't a red flag. It's his DNA. And in 2024 he said it himself: Mission > noise. Watch what happens when the mission is complete. 💯

A mailbox? 😂 No photo, no address, no building name, no proof you were even there. Just "trust me bro, I was in Dubai". Anyone can type that sheep. If a closed door and a story count as proof, then I can say I visited and saw a full office. Do you believe that too? And let's say you actually did go. An office door tells you nothing about how a company runs. The Khaleej Times partnership and the UAE Ad Exchange were covered by the publisher and the trade media, not by a mailbox. Post the photo. Post the address. Until then it's one more story with nothing behind it 🤣

10 seconds of research and you posted AI summaries. That’s not a court document.😂🐑 Those screenshots still only name Svetlana A. and Robert H. for the 2021 period. Mark Firth is nowhere in them. Same as before. And the patent part is wrong. Robert H is the inventor, not the current owner. The PoV patents were assigned to VeraViews FZ-LLC. Check the public patent records. He doesn’t hold them anymore. Still an open investigation. Still no verdict. Lawyers still deny it. You just recycled the same allegation in AI form and called it research.

It isn’t a scam just because you bought near the top and lost money. A lot of people bought $VRA around the 2021 ATH and got absolutely destroyed afterwards. VRA is down massively from its peak, but that kind of collapse wasn’t unique to VRA, the 2022 crypto winter destroyed entire sectors, with some major DeFi tokens losing up to 95% and the total crypto market falling more than 60%. And honestly, I never understood the “strongest community” narrative either. From what I saw, the community spent a huge amount of time begging the team to make changes, while at the same time getting angry whenever the team actually changed something. Most people weren’t defending the project itself, they were defending their bags. When the price goes up, everyone is a genius. When it crashes, suddenly the team are “liars” and it was all a scam. Losing money sucks. I get that. But your entry price and your portfolio loss aren’t evidence of fraud. You can hate VRA. You can regret buying it. You can walk away. But don’t rewrite the entire story just because the chart went against you.

Your first claim was: “there’s no evidence the company is functioning.” I answered that claim. On chain mint/burn shows the PoV infrastructure is still being operated. Renewed SSL on live VeraViews / NADeX domains shows the sites are still being maintained. A dead company does not keep those running. Now you changed it to: “that isn’t revenue.” Correct. I never said it was revenue. I said it is evidence the operation is still live. Those are two different things. And honestly, whether VeraViews exact revenue is public isn't for random accounts on X to determine either way, that's private company financials, most B2B companies don't publish real time revenue figures, that's completely normal outside crypto too.

That's not evidence, that's a chain of assumptions where each step just asserts the next without proof. The UAE update is from June 2025, that's a year ago, not "years ago" like you're implying to make it sound stale. On the supply increase, here's exactly what $VRA stated: In light of accelerating client adoption across Web2 and Web3, landmark progress, and major VeraViews product milestones, the Verasity Foundation has authorized an increase in the maximum supply of VRA to support long term scalability. This adjustment accommodates upcoming PoV activities, ad stack operations, and future demand. Think about what that actually implies. A dilution that large wasn't random, it was scaled to match client adoption. Which means there's very likely a far bigger client base behind the scenes than what we can currently see publicly, we only know a fraction of the confirmed names, Khaleej Times, IAB MENA, industry press, all independently verified, not just VRA's own marketing. If the supply expansion was sized for that level of growth, the actual client list is probably much larger than the community assumes. And the uncapped supply everyone's crying about? Think about the alternative. A hard cap with a rapidly growing client base means PoV eventually hits a wall it can't scale past. That's exactly the kind of rigid design that leads to a $LUNC style collapse, a system breaking under its own success. Uncapped function tied supply isn't the risk. A fixed cap forced onto real growing infrastructure is. And "Nothing has happened because no one's getting paid because they're out of business" is three unproven claims stacked into one sentence. Still zero wallet trail, zero court filing, zero regulator statement behind any of it.