Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Ă la demande de @PrefetOccitanie, notre match #TFCESTAC au Stadium, initialement programmĂ© samedi Ă 17h15, est dĂ©calĂ© au dimanche Ă 17h15 â ïžâ°
Faites circuler l'information pour Ă©viter toute erreur đ
âčïž Les billets du samedi sont bien sĂ»r toujours valables pour le dimanche.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
đš đšđš I think we're living through a civilizational turning point. And most people haven't realized it yet. đšđšđš
We keep hearing that the globalist project is collapsing. It isn't. It's alive and well in the European Union, where Brussels keeps marching on as if nothing happened. And in the United States, it didn't die. It mutated.
If you want to see what that mutation looks like, read what DataRepublican just published. According to the audio and the thousands of documents she scraped, a network of former USAID and State Department officials, organized under a group called Renew to Thrive, is working on what they call "the day after tomorrow": what a rewritten American government should look like.
And they're not alone. She reports that this group sits inside a much larger, extremely discreet umbrella, the United Democracy Alliance, which coordinates the major "resistance" NGOs: when protests get deployed, on what timeline, how to respond. Operationalized, according to her, by an organization of 1,600 former military, intelligence and diplomatic officials.
The most chilling part: they've reportedly drafted a list of "red lines" past which the elected federal government should be declared illegitimate. The one they discuss most is invoking the Insurrection Act. And the mechanism doesn't even require governors to sign anything. They just have to refuse federal troops in their state and let the network do the rest.
Senator Mike Lee said he was speechless. Elon replied with one word: "Troubling."
Understand this: for these people, it isn't politics anymore. It's survival. They lost power at the ballot box, so they're building the machinery to contest the very legitimacy of the people who won. Their influence, their networks, their money, their impunity, everything they've built over decades depends on getting back in. So they're going all in.
And this fight is happening at the most decisive moment in human history: the arrival of superintelligence.
Whoever controls the state when AI surpasses humans won't just win an election. They'll win the century.
I only see two scenarios.
Scenario one: the Democrats take back power. Remember what Elon said in 2024: "If he loses, I'm f*cked. How long do you think my prison sentence is going to be?" Everyone laughed. Read those documents again and tell me he was joking. If a movement that pre-writes the criteria for declaring an elected government illegitimate comes back to power, there's a very strong chance Elon gets persecuted. Him, X, and everyone who dared to speak up.
And the world that follows is 1984 with GPUs. A hyper-class owning all the means of production: AI, robots, data, energy. The rest of humanity locked into a form of techno-feudal slavery, on a drip, surveilled, docile. Communism always promised equality and delivered a nomenklatura. With AI, the nomenklatura won't even need the people anymore.
Scenario two: Elon wins with the Republicans. And this deathly project gets dismantled. Not reformed, not slowed down. Dismantled. Every network, every unelected structure, brought into the light. And we finally do what history never had the courage to do: the Nuremberg of communism. The great moral and historical trial of an ideology that killed tens of millions of people and is still trying to sneak back in through the back door.
There is no third way. No lukewarm scenario. The coming decade will decide.
Pick your side while you still have the right to.
đšđšTHE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE đš
Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone.
The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.
R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.
R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative.
Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.
It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.
You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.
Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.
As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.
Important to understand:
The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
đ«”đ» Gardez le moral, les amis.đ«đ·
Notre pays nâest pas foutu. Il a vacillĂ©, oui. Un pied a glissĂ© sur le pavĂ©, les vitres ont Ă©clatĂ©, les flammes ont lĂ©chĂ© les façades et la haine a parlĂ© plus fort que la raison.
Mais la France nâest pas un pays qui tombe. Elle est un pays qui se relĂšve.
Nous avons connu les tempĂȘtes, les guerres, les fractures, les nuits oĂč tout semblait perdu. Chaque fois, les pierres ont Ă©tĂ© remises une Ă une, les cĆurs se sont redressĂ©s, et la lumiĂšre a fini par lâemporter.
Aujourdâhui encore, malgrĂ© les cendres et les vitrines Ă©ventrĂ©es, quelque chose demeure intact : la force silencieuse de ceux qui aiment ce pays pour de vrai. Ceux qui reconstruisent, qui consolent, qui travaillent, qui transmettent, qui refusent de laisser le chaos avoir le dernier mot et qui aiment la France.
La France est un grand pays. Pas par les slogans, mais par ce quâelle a dĂ©jĂ surmontĂ©. Elle porte en elle des siĂšcles de rĂ©silience, dâesprit, de lumiĂšre et de courage. Elle nâest pas le reflet dâune seule nuit de violence. Elle est la somme de millions de vies qui, demain matin, ouvriront leurs volets, iront au travail, emmĂšneront leurs enfants Ă lâĂ©cole et continueront de croire quâil est encore possible dây croire. Nos dirigeants nous plombent mais le peuple français est un grand peuple. Et les patriotes y sont nombreux.
Le sursaut nâest pas une promesse lointaine. Il est dĂ©jĂ lĂ , dans le refus de baisser les bras, dans la dignitĂ© de ceux qui nettoient, qui protĂšgent, qui rĂ©parent. Il est proche parce quâil est nĂ©cessaire. Parce quâun peuple qui a marchĂ© aussi longtemps ne sâarrĂȘte pas sur un faux pas.
Alors, gardez le moral. RelĂšvez la tĂȘte. La France nâest pas finie.
Elle est simplement en train de se souvenir de qui elle est. Et elle se relĂšvera. BientĂŽt. đ«đ·â„ïž
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted

Le Canon Français@CanonFrancais18h
France
FranceConnected via France App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
đš SCANDALE : lâEtat veut nous obliger Ă PAYER LA POLICE pour quâelle contienne une manif dâantifĂȘtes menaçants !
On marche sur la tĂȘte dans ce pays !
Les mĂȘmes groupes extrĂ©mistes qui organisent le SACCAGE de la France depuis des semaines menacent une nouvelle fois une fĂȘte du Canon Français.
Nous venons de recevoir un courrier du commissariat de Biarritz agissant sur instruction du sous-prĂ©fet qui nous rĂ©clame de PAYER lâencadrement par la police dâun rassemblement dâantifĂȘtes jugĂ©e susceptible de dĂ©raper en violence comme ces derniers jours !
LâEtat pense que ces groupes risquent de perpĂ©trer des violences donc ça serait Ă NOUS de payer les moyens dĂ©ployĂ©s pour les contenir ??!!
Câest le monde Ă lâenvers !!
Nous payons comme il se doit une sĂ©curitĂ© privĂ©e Ă chaque Ă©vĂšnement pour sĂ©curiser lâaccĂšs et le bon dĂ©roulement de nos banquets.
Et nous payons comme tout le monde des IMPĂTS pour ĂȘtre protĂ©gĂ©s des dĂ©linquants.
Il faut maintenant payer lâEtat EN PLUS pour que la police fasse son travail ?!
On est devenu un pays failli du tiers monde ou quoi ?!
On va tous devoir payer lâEtat pour quâil nous protĂšge contre les dĂ©linquants ?!
à tous ceux qui ont vu ou subi les destructions et agressions de ces derniers jours organisées par une mouvance bien identifiée :
LâEtat peut un jour vous demander de PAYER pour vous protĂ©ger de ces dĂ©linquants !
1 MILLIARD DâEUROS de dĂ©gĂąts le week-end dernier : la facture nâĂ©tait pas assez lourde ? Il faut quâon paye leur service dâordre maintenant ?
@NunezLaurent @EmmanuelMacron
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Capitalism has a win condition. Socialism does not.
Here's why, explained so simply a 10-year-old could get it. It starts with a book written in 1944 by an Austrian economist named Friedrich Hayek: The Road to Serfdom.
Imagine a classroom of 30 kids. One day the teacher says: "From now on, I decide what everyone eats for lunch, which games you play at recess, and who sits next to whom. It's fairer that way."
First problem: the teacher doesn't know what you like. You hate carrots. Your friend is allergic to peanuts. Lucas wants to play football, Emma wants to draw. 30 kids, 30 different wishes. Nobody can know all of that, not even the smartest teacher on Earth. Hayek called this the knowledge problem. The information needed to run an economy is scattered across millions of heads, and it can't be gathered in one office.
Second problem: the kids start fighting. "Why does he get the window seat?" "Why football again?" Before, everyone just chose for themselves. Now every choice is a fight, because every choice is made for everyone.
Third problem: the class can't agree on a plan, so someone says "we need one person in charge who just decides." This is Hayek's key insight. Planning doesn't fail because planners are evil. A plan needs everyone to agree on the same goals, and free people never agree on everything. So the plan needs force to work.
Fourth problem, and it's the scariest one: who wants that job? The kind kid doesn't want it, because the kind kid doesn't want to force 29 people to eat carrots. The job attracts the one who likes giving orders and doesn't mind punishing those who disobey. Hayek wrote a whole chapter on this, called "Why the Worst Get on Top." It doesn't happen by accident. It happens by selection.
Here's the trap. When the person who controls your lunch also controls your job, your home, your shop and your newspaper, they control your whole life. You can't say no, because there's nowhere else to go. Controlling the economy doesn't mean controlling one part of life. It means controlling the means to every goal you have.
That's the road to serfdom. Nobody votes for a dictator. People vote for "someone should fix this," then for "give them more power to fix it," and one day they wake up with no one left to say no to.
The USSR, Maoist China, Cambodia, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela. These are different countries with different cultures and languages, and the story has the same ending every time. When a script produces the same ending every time, it isn't bad luck. It's the script.
Now capitalism. Back to the classroom. Instead of one teacher deciding everything, every kid can trade. You give me your carrots, I give you my apple, and we both walk away happier. Nobody needs to know what everyone wants, because prices do that job. A price is a message telling millions of strangers what's scarce and what's wanted, with no one in charge.
That's the win condition. In capitalism, you get rich by making something other people freely choose to buy, so your success depends on serving others. In a planned system, you get ahead by pleasing whoever holds power. One rewards usefulness. The other rewards obedience.
And this isn't theory. Two centuries ago, almost every human being was extremely poor. In 1990, about 38% of humanity still lived in extreme poverty. Today it's under 10%. More than a billion people escaped it in a single generation. It happened when China, India, Vietnam and South Korea opened up to markets, trade and private enterprise. The largest reduction in poverty in human history came from letting people trade.
So why do so many people hate capitalism?
Because what they hate usually isn't capitalism.
They hate the bank that got bailed out with their taxes while they lost their house. They hate the giant company that writes the regulations so no startup can compete with it. They hate rent they can't afford because building new homes has been made nearly impossible. They hate the lobbyist who gets a subsidy while the small business owner drowns in paperwork.
Look closely at each one, and you'll find a state handing out privileges. A bailout is not the market. The market would have let the bank fail. A regulation written by incumbents is not competition. It's protection from competition. None of this is capitalism. It's cronyism, which is what happens when businesses stop competing for customers and start competing for politicians.
People see the symptom and blame the wrong cause. They say "capitalism failed" and ask for more state. That gives more power to the same people who created the problem, and it puts us right back on Hayek's road.
The answer to bad capitalism isn't less freedom. It's less privilege. That means fewer bailouts, fewer protected incumbents, fewer permits, and more people allowed to build, compete and trade.
Capitalism has a win condition: make things people want. Socialism has an end condition: someone has to be in charge. And history keeps showing us who ends up in that chair.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
âïž VICTOIRE !
L'INSEE s'est engagé à diffuser rapidement les données manquantes de nationalité détaillée, pour tous les départements et villes de plus de 50 000 habitants.
Un grand merci Ă tous pour votre mobilisation.
Ensemble, si on ne lĂąche rien, on fait bouger les choses !
Comptez sur nous pour surveiller avec attention la réalisation de cet engagement.
Replying to @InseeFr @ou_va_ma_France
Les données relatives à la nationalité détaillée seront disponibles rapidement sous la forme de jeux de données complémentaires. 7/8
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Câest quand mĂȘme fascinant de voir cette jeune femme passer Ă la tĂ©lĂ© et affirmer son bullshit avec un aplomb total. Aucune hĂ©sitation, aucune nuance. Je suis quasiment persuadĂ© quâelle Ă©tait convaincue que personne nâirait vĂ©rifier.
Et câest ça le plus intĂ©ressant. Pas lâerreur, la certitude. Une partie de cette gĂ©nĂ©ration a Ă©tĂ© biberonnĂ©e Ă une grille de lecture oĂč lâon est du bon cĂŽtĂ© par dĂ©finition. Et quand on est du bon cĂŽtĂ©, on nâa plus besoin de vĂ©rifier. Le rĂ©el devient un dĂ©tail, presque une provocation.
AprĂšs la Seconde Guerre mondiale, la psychologie sociale sâest obsĂ©dĂ©e sur une seule question : comment des gens normaux ont-ils pu participer Ă lâhorreur ?
Asch a montrĂ© que trois quarts des participants niaient au moins une fois ce quâils voyaient de leurs propres yeux dĂšs que le groupe affirmait le contraire. Milgram a montrĂ© que prĂšs de deux tiers allaient jusquâĂ infliger ce quâils croyaient ĂȘtre une dĂ©charge potentiellement mortelle, simplement parce quâune autoritĂ© leur assurait que câĂ©tait justifiĂ©. Browning, dans Des hommes ordinaires, a montrĂ© que des pĂšres de famille de Hambourg sont devenus des exĂ©cuteurs sans fanatisme particulier, par conformisme, pour ne pas se dĂ©solidariser du groupe. Arendt a appelĂ© ça la banalitĂ© du mal : le pire ne vient pas de monstres, il vient de gens qui ont cessĂ© de penser par eux-mĂȘmes parce quâils Ă©taient certains dâavoir raison.
Toute proportion gardĂ©e, Ă©videmment, ce nâest pas la mĂȘme chose. Mais le mĂ©canisme, lui, est identique : une conviction morale absolue qui dispense de regarder le rĂ©el. Gad Saad appelle ça lâempathie suicidaire, une empathie tellement dĂ©connectĂ©e des consĂ©quences quâelle finit par dĂ©truire ce quâelle prĂ©tend protĂ©ger.
Les gens qui ont causĂ© les pires catastrophes de lâhistoire Ă©taient rarement des sadiques. CâĂ©taient des gens persuadĂ©s dâĂȘtre du bon cĂŽtĂ©. Câest pour ça quâune gĂ©nĂ©ration qui considĂšre la vĂ©rification comme une trahison morale nâest pas un sujet anodin. Ă long terme, le mĂ©canisme produit les mĂȘmes effets, quelle que soit la cause quâil sert.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
đŽâïž Mise Ă jour sur les 46 premiĂšres condamnations des PILLAGES/ĂMEUTES du 17 octobre (dispo dans la presse).
đŽ Toulouse â Ylan, 18 ans. Jet de cocktail Molotov vers des policiers (allumĂ© mais sans explosion).
- Peine : 12 mois avec sursis + 140 h de TIG + privation du droit de vote 3 ans.
- Peine encourue : 10 ans de prison.
đŽ Lille â 3 hommes (20-27 ans) dont 2 clandestins. InterpellĂ©s avec sacs remplis avec le fruit de pillages Micromania et Calzedonia.
- Peine : 10 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt + interdiction du territoire 2 ans (pour les 2 clandestins).
- Peine encourue : 5Â ans de prison.
đŽ Lille â PĂšre de famille avec pied-de-biche, tentative d'effraction dans un magasin.
- Peine : 10 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt + interdiction de manifester de 3 ans.
- Peine encourue : 7Â ans de prison.
đŽ Lille â Homme de 23 ans, tirs de mortier vers les forces de l'ordre.
- Peine : 12Â mois sous bracelet + 140Â h de TIG.
- Peine encourue : 5Â ans de prison.
đŽ Reims â Sahel W., 19 ans. Pillage dans un Carrefour Express.
- Peine : 105Â h de TIG.
- Peine encourue : 7 ans de prison.
đŽ Reims â Hugo M., 20 ans. Pilage de vĂȘtements Ă la boutique Caviar.
- Peine : 4Â mois sous bracelet.
- Peine encourue : 7Â ans.
đŽ Rouen â Livreur tunisien, pillage d'une boutique de rachat d'or (16 000 ⏠de bijoux dans les poches). RĂ©cidiviste.
- Peine : 8 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt + révocation de 6 mois de sursis d'une condamnation précédente.
- Peine encourue : 14 ans de prison.
đŽ Rouen â Anthony, SDF. Pillage de la boutique Courir. RĂ©cidiviste.
- Peine : 6 mois de prison + 6 avec suris.
- Peine encourue : 14 ans de prison.
đŽ Rouen â ChĂŽmeur de 26 ans. Pillage de Micromania. RĂ©cidiviste.
- Peine : 6 mois sous bracelet.
- Peine encourue : 14 ans de prison.
đŽ Rouen â Nicolas, Ă©boueur et Zakaria. Jets de projectiles sur les policiers et outrages.
- Peine : 12 mois sous bracelet.
- Peine encourue : 5 ans de prison.
đŽ Lyon â Mohamed, clandestin. Pillage boutique Louis Vuitton (6 portefeuilles, 2 paires de lunettes, un pantalon, un sac en cuir et un sac en tissu).
- Peine : 6 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt + interdiction du territoire pendant 2 ans.
- Peine encourue : 7Â ans de prison.
đŽ Lyon â Cheima, femme de 30 ans. Pillage du magasin JD Sports.
- Peine : 8 mois avec sursis.
- Peine encourue : 7Â ans de prison.
đŽ Lyon â Sophia, 27 ans. DĂ©jĂ 9 condamnations dont vols. Pillage du magasin JD Sports.
- Peine : 12Â mois sous bracelet.
- Peine encourue : 14Â ans de prison.
đŽ Lyon â Adam, Suisse de 19 ans. « Black bloc » venu de l'Ă©tranger. InterpelĂ© sortant d'un Monoprix pillé + rĂ©bellion.
- Peine : 12Â mois avec sursis.
- Peine encourue : 7Â ans de prison.
đŽ Perpignan â Homme de 20 ans, jet d'une barriĂšre de chantier sur 2 policiers.
- Peine : 6 mois sous bracelet
- Peine encourue : 5 ans de prison.
- Réquisitions : 6 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt.
đŽ Perpignan â Homme de 21 ans. Jet de projectiles sur des policiers et dĂ©gradations de mobilier urbain. Lunettes de ski, t-shirt en cagoule et gants coquĂ©s.
- Peine : 10 mois sous bracelet.
- Peine encourue : 7 ans de prison.
- Réquisitions : 8 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt.
đŽ Perpignan â Livreur Amazon de 22 ans, dĂ©jĂ une condamnation au casier. Vol de scooter aprĂšs manif avec dissimulation du visage, en rĂ©union et effraction.
- Peine : 8Â mois sous bracelet.
- Peine encourue : 10 ans de prison.
- Réquisitions : 5 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt.
đŽ Limoges â Femme de 20 ans. Pillage dans des commerces et Ă l'HĂŽtel de Ville (dĂ©truit par le feu plus tard).
- Peine : 6 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt + 18 avec sursis prob.
- Peine encourue : 7Â ans de prison.
đŽ Pau â Homme de 43 ans. Jets de projectiles sur les policiers.
- Peine : 6Â mois sous bracelet.
- Peine encourue : 5Â ans de prison.
đŽ NĂźmes â Prof d'EPS de 24 ans. Jets de projectiles ayant blessĂ© un policier (3 j d'ITT).
- Peine : 18Â mois avec sursis prob.
- Peine encourue : 5Â ans de prison.
đŽ Grenoble â 10 personnes (18-43 ans). Pillages de magasins (tĂ©lĂ©phonie, parfums) aprĂšs bris de vitrines.
Peines : de 4 mois avec sursis à 8 mois ferme (ferme pour 1 individu déjà condamné à du sursis en juin).
Peine encourue : 7 ans de prison.
đŽ Poitiers â Vol en rĂ©union et dans un lieu d'entrepĂŽt (pillages de commerces, dont Sephora et Foot Locker).
- Peine : 6 mois de prison.
- Peine encourue : 7 ans de prison.
đŽ Tours â Un clandestin de 32 ans et un lycĂ©en de 19 ans. Recel de biens pillĂ©s.
- Peines : 4 mois avec sursis pour le clandestin, 3 semaines de TIG pour le lycéen.
- Peine encourue : 5 ans.
đŽ Nantes â 4 hommes (19-28 ans). Un clandestin, un auto-entrepreneur, un lycĂ©en, un Ă©tudiant. Pillages dans des magasins (Fnac, Foot LockerâŠ) ou violences sur FO.
- Peines : 4, 6 et 8 mois avec sursis.
- Peine encourue : de 5 Ă 7Â ans.
đŽ Agen â Deux femmes d'une mĂȘme famille, tout de noir vĂȘtues. Violences et outrages sur un policier + dĂ©gradation d'un vĂ©hicule de police.
- Peine : 6 mois avec sursis + stage de citoyenneté.
- Peine encourue : 5Â ans de prison.
đŽ Bobigny â 3 hommes (23-24 ans). Possession de pistolet factice, mortiers, cagoules, kit cocktails molotov.
Peines : de 10 mois avec sursis Ă 7 mois sous bracelet.
Peine encourue : 7 ans de prison.
đŽ Paris â Edmondson G., 21 ans, ex-pompier. InterpellĂ© avant manif avec kit cocktail Molotov dans un sac Ă dos. VidĂ©os sur son tĂ©lĂ©phone le montrant lancer un cocktail Molotov la veille.
Peine : 2 mois de prison avec mandat de dépÎt + 6 avec sursis.
Peine encourue : 7Â ans de prison.
đŽ Paris â Andy M., 23 ans, agent de sĂ©curitĂ©. Tir de mortier dâartifice sur les forces de l'ordre avenue des Champs-ĂlysĂ©es.
Peine : 12Â mois avec sursis. NON-INSCRIPTION AU CASIER.
Peine encourue : 5 ans.
(Sources : Paris Match / Actu-Juridique / Actu-fr / ICI / RFI / BFM / L'IndĂ©pendant / France3 RĂ©gions / Sud Ouest / Midi Libre / Ouest-France / La Nouvelle RĂ©publique / La DĂ©pĂȘche - Photo : AFP)
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Moi Ă mon Ă©poque on dĂ©membrait pas des gamines en plein Paris, on tirait pas sur des gens dans un concert Ă la kalach, on abattait pas des journalistes, on dĂ©capitait pas des profs, on poignardait pas dans les fĂȘtes de village, on roulait pas sur des bĂ©bĂ©s Ă Nice, etc, etc.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Témoin de violences, de dégradations ou de pillages ces derniers jours ?
Le @prefetpolice a décidé de la création d'une plateforme dédiée.
Nâattendez pas : transmettez toutes vos images aux services de police afin de les aider Ă identifier et interpeller rapidement les auteurs.
Accédez à la plateforme :
demarche.numerique.gouv.fr/câŠ
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Regardez et régalez vous.
Regardez bien comment des blancs de LFI se chient dessus face Ă un musulman LFI.
Bande de gauchiasses bien françaises bouffez votre propre merde. C'est mérité.
#17octobre #pillages @MathildePanot @JLMelenchon
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Je dis aux racailles dĂ©cĂ©rĂ©brĂ©es qui saccagent tout : barrez-vous ! Si vous nâaimez pas la France, quittez-la. Vous nous faites honte et faites honte Ă nos parents qui se sont battus et nous ont transmis lâamour de ce pays. Ă cause de vous, le soupçon sera jetĂ© sur nous. Partez !
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
The Useful Idiot: A Natural History
Specimen: Western, educated, well-meaning.
Habitat: universities, NGOs, quality newspapers, dinner parties where the wine is good and the opinions are better.
Status: abundant.
The useful idiot is not exactly stupid. This is the first and most important thing to understand. Stupidity would be a defense. The more precise diagnosis is what we in Poland call pĂłĆ-inteligent â the half-wit. Not the bottom of the intelligence distribution, which is too obviously lost to be useful. Not the genuine top, which tends to develop the inconvenient habit of following arguments wherever they actually lead. The sweet spot: smart enough to absorb a complex ideological framework, to deploy its vocabulary with confidence, to feel the social rewards of appearing sophisticated â but not quite sharp enough to interrogate the framework itself. Enough horsepower to run the program. Not enough to question who wrote it. The pĂłĆ-inteligent is the useful idiotâs technical specification. And the specimen is typically convinced â this is crucial â that it is among the most independent thinkers in the room. The delusion is important. Remove it and the whole architecture collapses.
The species emerges in conditions of comfort and safety, which is why it proliferates in precisely the societies it works to undermine. It requires a baseline of security â enough that the consequences of being wrong about power remain abstract, theoretical, someone elseâs problem. Eastern Europeans, who paid in flesh and decades for the privilege of understanding what the useful idiot enables, are able to see this as naivety so profound it becomes a moral failure. Not innocence. Culpable ignorance dressed as virtue.
Observe the specimen in its natural habitat. It discovers The Cause sometime between the ages of 18 and 24, usually at an institution of higher education, usually through social contagion rather than solitary reasoning. The Cause varies by generation â Soviet sympathies, third-worldism, postcolonial theory, current-year identity grievance â but the structure is invariant: a clean division of the world into oppressors and oppressed, a designated villain class, and a role for the specimen as enlightened ally. The emotional reward is immediate and substantial. Belonging. The claim of moral clarity. The warm superiority of the awake among the sleeping.
What the specimen does not perceive â what it is structurally prevented from perceiving â is that it is being used. Lenin coined the phrase, and he meant it with cold precision. The useful idiot is not a partner in the project. It is infrastructure. It provides legitimacy laundering: translating raw power-seeking into the language of justice, making the predatory appear compassionate, and doing so with enough genuine conviction to be convincing. The cynics who run the operation cannot do this themselves â cynicism is legible. True believers are required. The useful idiotâs sincerity is its primary value to those who deploy them. And so Lenin used them â and so does Islam now.
The specimenâs lifecycle has a melancholy third act that it rarely anticipates. When the project advances far enough â when the institutions are captured, when the Overton window has moved sufficiently â the useful idiot becomes inconvenient. It knows too much about the earlier, more honest phase. It has friendships across the new fault lines. It retains, sometimes, inconvenient principles from when principles were the point. The revolution, as it industrializes, prefers newer models: fully formed apparatchiks with no memory of idealism to complicate their loyalty. The useful idiot is retired, marginalized, occasionally denounced by the very movement it spent decades building. It dies puzzled. It never quite understands what happened.
We've all seen the very surprised lady in Paris...
History is littered with these figures. Western intellectuals who defended the Soviet project through the show trials, the Holodomor, the Gulag â and who spent the rest of their lives in various stages of retrospective rationalization. Fellow travelers who called Solidarity troublemakers, who thought the dissidents were exaggerating, who trusted the official version over the testimony of people who had lived it. Their names are recorded. Their counterparts today are producing content, signing letters, and occupying endowed chairs.
The useful idiot is not the enemy. It is the weapon. Understanding the difference matters â because the weapon can, in principle, be disarmed. It requires only one thing: contact with reality at sufficient intensity and duration to override the social rewards of the delusion. This happens. Some recover. Eastern European experience â the unignorable, undeniable, lived reality of what the project actually produces â has cured more than a few.
The cure is not pleasant. It requires admitting that oneâs most cherished moral identity was constructed by people who found it useful. That the independence one prided oneself on was curated. That the dinner party consensus was not wisdom but a lie. Most cannot make this admission. The identity investment is too great. They double down instead â find new framings, new rationalisations, new ways to explain why this time is different, why the critics are the real problem.
They remain, to the end, useful.
The look of someone discovering reality.
This young woman stood in front of a smashed shop window in Paris last night and said the smashing and looting are not what the cause is about. She still believes the people who broke the glass share her cause. They donât. They have their own.
This is not how she imagined it. It has a name: cognitive dissonance â the pain of watching reality contradict what you were told to believe.
She learned it last night, in pain. Millions of others will learn it in the coming months â the same way. Because reality doesnât need the media. It comes through the window.
We were right all along.đđ»
And they were wrong.
So will they admit it now, and let go of their delusions? Or will they double down?
In 1954, an American psychologist infiltrated a small cult that had predicted the end of the world on a precise date. The date came. Nothing happened. Did the believers give up? The most committed did the opposite: they started preaching harder than ever.
That is what most true believers will do. Admitting the error would cost them their friends, their careers and their image of themselves. So they will blame the police, the "far right," the economy, the weather â anything but the idea.
For them to change their minds, their whole system will have to collapse â the salaries, the institutions, the friends who all think alike. Belief survives as long as the group survives. We have seen it before: in 1989, when the system fell, Polandâs communists woke up one morning as social democrats â and a good number of them as businessmen.
But the believers are not the audience. The people watching are. Reality rarely converts the priests. It converts the congregation â one broken window at a time.
And yesterday was much more than a broken window. A day like that must have opened the eyes of millions. Events like that change history.
The priests will keep preaching. The congregation has already started to leave.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Bonjour @InseeFr, pouvez-vous expliquer pourquoi vous avez discrÚtement multiplié par 14 le seuil d'anonymisation des nationalités étrangÚres du recensement annuel ?
Avant : toutes les villes de plus de 50k habitants, tous les départements.
Désormais : uniquement les zones de plus de 700k habitants.
La perte de prĂ©cision est dramatique. La plupart des dĂ©partements n'apparaissent mĂȘme plus. Plus aucun dĂ©tail par ville.
Une réponse ou un rétablissement de la précision antérieure est indispensable à une bonne compréhension. "Mesurer pour comprendre" est votre devise, non ?
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Bon.
Ceux qui nâont pas compris : est-ce que câest clair pour vous ?
Câest LFI ou le CHAOS.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Nous sommes sur une espĂšce chimiquement pure de la bobo gauchiste.
Câest de lâart.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Le 17 octobre, ce nâest pas de la violence. Câest de la terreur.
Ils terrorisent tout un peuple, prennent la population en otage et passent Ă lâacte. Leur idĂ©ologie de violence assumĂ©e ressemble Ă celle de lâislamisme : la terreur comme moyen dâaction.
Il faut les qualifier pour ce quâils sont : des terroristes. Et les juger comme tels.
La RĂ©publique ne peut tolĂ©rer ceux qui, au nom dâune idĂ©ologie, mettent le feu aux institutions et menacent la population.
Le 17 octobre, câĂ©tait la terreur. Elle doit ĂȘtre nommĂ©e et combattue.
#Limoges #Terrorisme #Ultragauche #République
La Sous-direction antiterroriste (SDAT) a Ă©tĂ© saisie de lâaffaire.âl.lefigaro.fr/SgmA
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Macron a enfin eu son Ă©tat palestinienâŠ
Le monde entier se fout de sa gueule.
Flying Saucisson đ Debout, toujours! retweeted
Mon gouvernement pour 2027...ou avant !
- Président : Phillippe de Villiers
- 1er ministre : Napo Léon
- Intérieur : Poutine
- Justice : Bukele
- Economie : Milei
- Commerce, industrie : Musk
- Armées : Netanyahou
- Remigration : Abelardo de la Espriella
On est pas mal lĂ ...




































