Any man who joins a single mother to start a family should think twice. You're cultivating another man's land, investing your time and resources and hoping the harvest will be yours. One day, you might learn the hard way and end up crying with a running nose. Premium Warning ⚠️

If you marry a single mother, don't assume her children will automatically respect you as their father. They already have a biological father and your role in their lives depends on the family dynamics.

Only a foolish man would marry a single mother. Imagine farming another man's land, investing your time and resources, only for him to return one day and claim it. All that effort and you're left with nothing.

Some women will set their own lives on fire, watch everything burn, and lose a good man in the process. By the time reality slaps them the damage is done, and suddenly, every man is the problem except them.

A woman will first face self-destruction before she chooses to get sense.

Stop overextending yourself to please a woman. Show love, but never sacrifice your peace, dignity and resources trying to earn loyalty. You can be a good man without making yourself a fool.

Too many people want the benefits of marriage without the responsibilities. They want a partner for the good times but disappear when life gets difficult. Marriage isn't just about sharing a bed and enjoying the good times; it's about standing together when life tests you.

Marriage is a business contract to you, and your husband is an ATM that must never malfunction? Imagine abandoning a man over temporary financial hardship, then expecting someone to stand by you when life turns against you. You're a gold digging parasite, not a wife.

They want a partner for the good times but disappear when life gets difficult. Marriage is a commitment, not a business deal where you abandon your partner when their financial situation changes.

After fcking a whole roster, na when e reach him turn you suddenly discover celibacy till marriage. Ok.

If your standards depend on another man's pocket, you don't have standards. You have financial expectations disguised as self-worth.

You claim to be independent, yet you're looking for a man richer than you who will finance your lifestyle, cook for you and clown himself just to keep you entertained. Madam, you're not looking for equality; you're looking for a wealthy houseboy with romantic skills.

Approaching a woman is not signing an ATM contract. A man can genuinely like you without agreeing to finance your lifestyle. If your only interest in a man is what he can spend on you, be honest and call it business, not love.

You rejected a broke man because he had nothing to offer, then got offended when he returned successful and treated you the same way you treated him as a transaction. You can't demand loyalty from someone you once judged by their financial status.

.@simon_ekpa stands for the right of his people to determine their own future, shape their own destiny, and decide how they want to be governed.

So a man moving on when you're not interested is now proof he wanted access? You reject him, he leaves and you still complain. You want the man to respect your rejection but somehow keep chasing you afterward. The entitlement is embarrassing.