Brook Trout retweeted
Hate it!! Should never happen, unless it must, bc gives a team an advantage they shouldn’t get!!
How SF had to play on a Sunday & then play a BYE team on a short week, makes absolutely NO SENSE to me & such an unfair disadvantage!
Brook Trout retweeted
I'm a former defense attorney and currently a civil liberties attorney with no political dog in this fight. I watched the video at least 10 times from different angles and at different speeds and waited to offer an opinion, which I still reserve the right to change if additional information changes the calculus.
It is very clear that the officers instigated the confrontation. The woman initially tried to wave them past her.
ICE officers have no authority to search a US citizen or arrest her (unless there's probable cause to believe she's harboring undocumented individuals, not a contention here). A woman surrounded by masked, armed men who have no law enforcement authority over her has every right to try to escape. Video shows her steering wheel is turned to the right, clearly an attempt to leave WITHOUT hitting anyone and steer clear of the officer standing towards the front of her car. That officer had time to step to the side, which is where he was when he shot her.
Even a real police officer would not have the right to shoot at her for trying to flee. This is well-established in the case law; deadly force may not be used simply to prevent someone from getting away. Given that the ICE officers had no law enforcement authority to begin with, AND the video footage shows she was trying to escape a perceived threat, not to kill anyone, the crime is all the more inexcusable.
I'm praying for the victim's family, especially her children. I'm also praying for all the conservatives who are so unprincipled and lost they're excusing this terrible crime, and gloating over a death that will leave three young children motherless, because of the victim's politics.
1 of 2
@RepThomasMassie we live with a governmental system of checks and balances, but the presidential pardon has no checks. Currently the president can direct his staff to ignore the law and then pardon them for breaking it.
(Cont.)
Calling it now, Trump is never going to comply with the Epstein law and just pardon himself and his administration for violating the law.
Brook Trout retweeted
Dear Ukraine,
I apologize. I’m sorry my country elected someone who works for Putin. Someone who’s on Putin’s side. As long as he is President, America won’t stand with you. Just know tho, that most Americans DO stand with you.
Best,
A Ukraine-Supporting American Citizen
🇺🇦🇺🇦
Brook Trout retweeted
Saints DE Cam Jordan wasn’t happy with how loud the 49ers fans were in the Superdome on Sunday:
“I didn’t like it. I didn’t like the noise coming from them. Especially when Saints Nation has been so strong for so long. One of the rare instances where you could actually hear the opposing crowd in a loud manner. I hope that shit never happens again.”
Brook Trout retweeted
We have 217 signatures on the discharge petition to force a vote on legislation to release the Epstein files.
We need 218.
Will the 218th (final) signature be a Republican or a Democrat?
It’s time for every Congressmen to support transparency and justice for the victims.
Brook Trout retweeted
Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell moved to federal prison in Texas, source says
cnn.it/41pChib
Brook Trout retweeted
You cannot make this shit up. Sharing this jaw-dropping story with a gift link -- give it a read. theatlantic.com/politics/arc…
Brook Trout retweeted
Great video by @AIDRIVR breaking down the Mark Rober Autopilot test:
youtu.be/QhX_fgekpk0?si=mBwa…
Brook Trout retweeted
"Londoners keep dying because Churchill refuses to make peace.
If he stopped asking for aid and stopped insulting Hitler, the bombs would stop falling."
— @elonmusk, 1940 (probably)
As an Independent, I was all for @JDVance being president but not so sure after his run in with @ZelenskyyUa. Hope this was a tactic forced on him by his boss @realDonaldTrump to intentionally torpedo the deal. Z has thanked the US many times, not sure why JD questioned that
My question is below. Its a simple yes or no. If you say yes, then I'll attempt to prove it to you. If you say no, then you are unwilling to change your viewpoint even in the face of evidence, so what's the point? Also, I asked 1st, so youre the one changing the subject
Replying to @barlow2021 @Artemisfornow
There is nothing to indicate they are bigger or less nutrious, just more. IF crops ar producing 40% more with no decline in nutritional value, would you then say the extra CO2 is actually beneficial?
I ca do that too, what does it accomplish?
Replying to @barlow2021 @Artemisfornow
You didnt answer my question, IF it shows that, would you admit the increased CO2 is a good thing?

















