Fireweed. Wildflower that grows in disturbed places.

Olympic Peninsula #WA #PNW
Joined May 2023
Washington State Election Laws allow same day registration and the option to choose your own address if you identify as unsheltered. What is the procedure if you register and vote without identification? You vote with a provisional ballot. How does anyone verify your address if you don't live anywhere? What if you "move" from one non-residential address location to another? “What if I live outside/in a car/in a shelter? You can still register to vote, and we hope you do! You must fill out both the residential & mailing address sections on the voter registration form. Here’s how: Residential address: You need to list a residential address to be placed in your voting district. You can register at the shelter, park, vehicle location, intersection, or another identifiable location that you consider your current residence (or a traditional residential address if you have one). Provide as complete an address as possible (ex: 4th Ave & Cherry St, Seattle, WA 98104)” homelessinfo.org/wp-content/…
3
3
2
8
2,461
Who’s targeting your loved one’s ballot? Vulnerable voters can become targets for groups seeking political gain—especially when age, disability, cognitive decline or dependence on caregivers makes it difficult to recognize coercion or speak up. Every ballot belongs to a person. Assistance must never become pressure, manipulation or control. You can be the hero who steps forward. Ask questions. Engage local facilities. Learn the safeguards. Work with your state coalition to protect EVERY voter, regardless of party. Download the Protecting Vulnerable Voters Toolkit: electionintegritynetwork.org… Connect with your state coalition: electionintegritynetwork.org… Protect the person. Protect their choice. Be the hero in your community.
1
21
5
49
4,455
FIVE FACTS on Washington's Income Tax: FACT 1. The INCOME TAX Engine Is Built (Title 82A RCW): The hardest part of passing an income tax is building the administrative machinery. ESSB 6346 creates the full infrastructure: tax definitions, tracking, enforcement, and auditing under the Department of Revenue (ESSB 6346, Part I). Washington is already planning to hire HUNDREDS of tax agents. Once in place, lowering the tax threshold from $1,000,000 to $500k, $250k, or lower only takes a simple statutory vote. FACT 2 .Volatile Revenue Trap: The tax relies heavily on high-earner income and capital gains (Sec. 101, 201), which swing wildly during economic downturns. Because the law ties this money directly to funding permanent entitlement programs like universal K-12 meals and childcare (Sec. 1(2), 1(5)), budget shortfalls will force future legislatures to lower income thresholds to keep programs funded. FACT 3. Inevitable Taxes on Pensions, 401(k), IRA, and MORE: The tax is anchored to Federal Adjusted Gross Income (FAGI) (Sec. 101(3)). Any large 401(k) or traditional IRA distribution flows into FAGI. If threshold levels drop in the future, middle-class retirees making standard withdrawals or Roth conversions will get caught in the tax net. THIS IS INEVITABLE. FACT 4. Pension Protections Are Temporary: While the bill statutory carves out certain state pensions (Sec. 2.10.180, 41.32.052, etc.), statutory exemptions are policy choices, not permanent constitutional shields. What one legislature grants, a future legislature can modify or repeal. FACT 5. Constitutional Precedent Breached: By establishing a 9.9% tax on income (Sec. 201(1)), the bill creates the legal precedent that an income tax on Washington residents is permissible. Once the principle is legally normalized for the top 0.5% (Sec. 1(9)), the constitutional barrier protecting every other income bracket is effectively removed. THE INCOME TAX IS COMING FOR GROCERY STORE WORKERS, UPS DRIVERS, BOEING LINE WORKERS - EVERYONE. Emotional septum ring outbursts aren't a counter argument. The facts are the income tax is comoing for everyone and their retirement accounts. Go ahead, fact check me to find your counter argument. Avoid hyperbole. Good luck.
11
39
4
117
7,505
"A civilization is a method of organizing collective life and no society can live by two incompatible methods at once." - Feliks Koneczny (Polish historian)
🔘 What We Defend, What We Fight For – What This Is All About In Warsaw in 2017, beside the monument to the Uprising, Donald Trump said: "Our values will prevail." He listed them – faith and family, symphonies, innovation, the rule of law, free speech, the dignity of every life, liberty, sovereignty. A good list. But a list is not a framework. The Polish historian Feliks Koneczny offered one. A civilization, he said, is a method of organizing collective life – and no society can live by two incompatible methods at once. Poland, for him, was the eastern outpost of Latin civilization: Greece, Rome, and Western Christianity. That civilization was built in layers. 🔘 From the Greeks Truth, goodness, beauty. Spiritual goods above material ones – that is the Latin order of things. Science. Reason, evidence, open to criticism, open to new methods. Freedom of inquiry, limited only by the protection of human beings. Copernicus studied in Kraków. Marie Curie was born in Warsaw. 🔘 From Rome Law. Justice is giving each person their due. No retroactive laws. No one forced to incriminate himself. Poland guaranteed – long before England’s Habeas Corpus – no imprisonment without a court judgment. Two spheres. Public and private are distinct. The state is not the ruler’s property, and governing a territory does not mean owning everything in it. Law is subject to ethics – passing a statute does not make it right. Property. A basic right, protected against the state itself. Koneczny judged every civilization by three things: family, property, inheritance. In the Latin model, all three protect the person against an all-powerful state. 🔘 From Christianity The Ten Commandments. The foundation of personal and public morality. Universalism. No one is above moral judgment – not by birth, not by rank. A Polish scholar argued before a church council that pagan peoples had the right to their own states and could not be converted by the sword. The person. Each person answers for his own acts. No collective guilt, no herd. Self-reliance is a virtue. John Paul II built his philosophy on this. Dignity. Every human life has it, regardless of age, health, or ability. The family. Monogamous marriage. Parents and children above the clan. Time. Not to be wasted. A bond between generations – memory of the past, responsibility for the future. Self-government. Society organizes itself from the bottom up, and rulers and ruled answer to the same morals. "Nothing about us without us." Ten million Poles lived it in Solidarity. Defense. A duty of citizens, not a job for hired soldiers. Subsidiarity. The higher level does only what the lower ones cannot – the family first, then the town, then the region. The nation. A spiritual and cultural community held together by allegiance, not blood. "Ruthenian by origin, Polish by nation," as one Renaissance writer described himself. 🔘 The Modern Layer Liberty – yours ends where another’s rights begin. "For our freedom and yours" – a Polish motto. Free speech – full, won against censors, kept alive under Communism by émigré and underground presses. Religious toleration – the state does not impose a faith. While Europe burned heretics, Poland was a state without stakes. Its king: "I am not the king of your consciences." This fits with the Commandments: conscience binds the person; the state compels only what law may compel. Pluralism – different faiths and ways of life under one law. Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants, Jews and Armenians shared the old Commonwealth. Excellence – not just living alongside each other, but learning from the best. 🔘 So Only when we know what these values are and where they come from can we argue about them seriously. Are they sound? Do they hold together, or pull apart? Are they worth defending? Trump said our values will prevail. They will – if we can still name them. A civilization that cannot say what it stands for has already started to lose it.
2
16
Vulnerable voters are people—not political opportunities. No activist, operative or caregiver has the right to pressure a resident, control their choices or turn “assistance” into influence. Families and everyday citizens must be willing to step forward, ask questions and protect those who may not be able to protect themselves. Be the hero. Protect the person. Protect their choice. Download the Protecting Vulnerable Voters Toolkit linked in the comments
2
15
2
29
1,997
The last sunlight catching the rocky spires of the Liberty Bell Group above Blue Lake in the North Cascades. The golden larches and calm lake made this a beautiful evening in the mountains. 🍂 🏔️ 📷
15
30
3
232
2,207
Fireweed retweeted
If you feel you are being pushed to react don't react and don't do the opposite either. Do a 3rd thing.
102
85
11
1,299
47,214
Don’t miss “The one they ignored” - the proposed proclamation for Columbus / Indigenous People’s Day. Please consider making it a separate post we can share for this Day which needs a new name. My suggestion is Ancestry Day.
Clallam commissioners will proclaim Indigenous Peoples’ Day this morning even though no one requested it, no one showed up to receive it last year, and the board still can’t say how it started. ccwatchdog.com/p/nobody-requ…
2
15
Fireweed retweeted
Rome's tax farmers extracted wealth on a scale that destroyed the economies of entire regions, but it still wasn't as much as you pay in taxes today. The Publicani operated under the Roman Republic as private contractors who bid on provincial tax collection rights. The Senate auctioned these rights in advance, pocketing a lump sum immediately. The Publicani then descended on provinces like Asia Minor and Sicily to collect whatever they could squeeze out. Roman law set nominal rates, typically around 10% (the decuma) on grain, with varying port duties near 2.5% (the portoria). The Publicani collected those rates plus their margin plus their enforcement costs plus their profit. Provinces frequently faced effective extraction rates of 20 to 30 percent of productive output, sometimes higher during aggressive collection cycles. Arthur Laffer drew a curve on a napkin in 1974, but the math behind it is ancient. Every rate above the revenue-maximizing point destroys the productive base you're taxing. The Publicani, operating on commission incentives rather than long-term fiscal stewardship, had no interest in maximizing sustainable yield. They maximized immediate extraction, which pushed collection rates well past any rational Laffer optimum. Farmers in Asia Minor couldn't reinvest. Capital fled or disappeared into subsistence farming. The tax base shrank, and the next auction cycle extracted from a smaller, poorer province. Cicero documented this in his Verrine orations, watching Sicily's agricultural output collapse under predatory collection. Farmers abandoned fields outright. They did a rational calculation: continued production simply meant continued confiscation. Julius Caesar eventually reformed the system in the provinces precisely because the Publicani had killed the goose. He shifted to direct collection at fixed rates, recognizing that sustained revenue requires leaving producers enough surplus to keep producing. This is the cold logic that any collector ignoring the Laffer curve eventually confronts. The institutional structure of the Publicani created a perfect misalignment of incentives. Private actors with short collection windows, no accountability for provincial economic health, and profit tied directly to gross extraction maximized extraction and destroyed capital formation. If this sounds familiar to you today, it's because exactly the same is happening all over the world as we speak. Elected politicians have limited time in power to extract as much as they can before their term ends. They have unlearned what Caesar already realized 2000 years ago.
17
159
18
407
7,346
I asked @Grok if the updated postcard will impact #WA State "never-resided" voters in 2026. My understanding is that WA has the option to apply UOCAVA ballot counting rules to state approved "never-resided" ballots. People who never lived in WA State can continue to vote in our elections with different rules and less accountability than resident voters.
Does your election office have the updated Federal Post Card Application? The Department of War removed the “never lived in the United States” option from the federal form used by military and overseas voters. If your state permits never-resided citizens to vote, election officials should be able to explain the state law and application process they use. *Send the letter(in the comments) below to your state board of elections and county election office. Attach the memo and ask for a written response. **Memo:** omb.report/icr/202608-0704-0… **New Federal Post Card Application:** fvap.gov/uploads/FVAP/Forms/…
2
3
103
Did you know that not all overseas voters are treated the same under state law? A "never resided" voter is an adult U.S. citizen born overseas who has never lived in the United States. According to the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP), 38 states and Washington, D.C. provide a pathway for some "never resided" citizens to vote absentee using a parent or guardian's last U.S. residence to vote in state and federal elections. Other states do not. That's why residency rules matter. In fact, these laws are currently being challenged in courts across the country. In North Carolina, a recent lawsuit resulted in a ruling that "never resided" individuals are NOT eligible to vote in North Carolina elections. The takeaway: Military voters, overseas civilian voters, and "never resided" voters are often discussed together under UOCAVA—but they are not the same thing, and the rules vary significantly from state to state.
2
16
1
31
819
Elections enthusiasts around the world may be eligible to vote in the USA, even if they never resided in their chosen voting jurisdiction. Many states have a “never-resided” option added to UOCAVA (Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act). Although UOCAVA ballots are often called “military ballots”, they are also used by civilians living abroad, including citizens with deep roots and homes in their voting districts. Never-resided voters are a separate group with no connections to the armed forces and no physical residency in their voting districts, past or present. Why? Maybe an intervention to offset incorrect voting decisions by the local population. Hope someone will explain never-resided voters’ motivations in the comments. #WA State is especially friendly to UOCAVA. Citizenship is by self-attestation. The Voting precinct is the most recent Washington residential address of a parent, spouse or other relative. The ballot can be mailed anywhere in the world and returned electronically by email, fax or Internet.
1
1
1
117
Fireweed retweeted
SIGNS YOU HAVE A POWERFUL AURA 🪄 Liked by dogs Adored by children Look younger than your age People say you’re wise beyond your years Elderly people ask you for help at the store No one believes if you say you have no money
24
3
2
94
2,177
Structural capture. This is hands down the most outstanding writeup of how we have been robbed. And I am so glad he mentioned the Collier brothers. One more name: Ronnie Dugger wrote about the peril of the machines in 1988.
2
27
1
53
1,536
Attention #WA State residents! No matter how bad you think things are, they are actually much, much, worse.
Everything James Miller is saying here is true. I corresponded with him for a year (he was pretty traumatized over what happened) before he was ready to go public. The great shame about this is that he was the top-tier surgeon everyone wishes they could get, but after being forced to flee WA he can only practice outpatient medicine. That said, he's had amazing results for patients with therapies like DMSO, so he's arguably doing more good now. However, it underscores a major issue in medicine--the doctors patients can trust to break protocols to ensure they survive in the hospital (rather than how they always say "sorry, nothing could be done") tend to always be forced out. This is a major reason why whenever we can safely do it, we prioritize try to get patients well who are on the border of being hospitalized.
1
1
20
Didn’t vote for it - the bleak future of poverty and misery to fund a pro-crime, pro-blight regime that has legislative majorities and also owns the courts, election systems and the legacy media? What can a single person or small group actually do when their government has transformed into a destructive force that intends to impoverish them and destroy their culture? For starters, limit exposure to doomers. Think of them as an energy source like radiation that can be harmful for your health in large doses. Next, print out the attached post and start today with #1 on the list. “You cannot fight what you cannot name.” Much of the current misery in #WA State is the result of a culture that seems incapable of naming things correctly. One example, identifying obvious anarcho-tyranny as “soft-on-crime”.
The Positive Program – What We Actually Build. The diagnosis is complete. The disease has been named – the long march, its toolkit, the captured institutions, the Gramscian pipeline running in every Western country simultaneously. The question that follows is the only one that matters: what do we actually do? Not in theory. In practice. The extractable lessons from the places where the counter-march is actually working. 1. Name the mechanisms. Before anything else – the vocabulary. You cannot fight what you cannot name. Cultural hegemony, elite capture, the ratchet, the Overton Window, preference falsification, lawfare, repressive tolerance – these are not academic terms. They are the names of the weapons being used against you. The person who has this vocabulary reads the news differently, recognizes the mechanism in the specific story, can name what is being done rather than simply feeling it. Naming is the first act of resistance. The preference falsification ends when enough people discover simultaneously that they are not alone. The naming accelerates the cascade. 2. Break the distribution monopoly. Musk’s lesson. The long march controlled the transmission mechanisms – the school, the university, the media, the platform. The counter-march must break the monopoly on distribution before anything else is possible. X did this – imperfectly, incompletely, under constant assault from the Counter-Reformation. But the printing press didn’t need to be perfect. It needed to exist. The alternative distribution channels – X, Substack, podcasts, independent media – are the infrastructure of the counter-march. Fund them. Use them. Defend them. The EU Digital Services Act, the advertiser boycotts, the regulatory assault are the Index of Forbidden Books applied to the platform that replaced the public square. Resist them as what they are. 3. Build the intellectual infrastructure first. Hayek’s lesson. You cannot skip the intellectual work and go straight to the politician. Someone must produce the ideas. Someone must translate them for millions. Someone must fund the institutions that do both for twenty years, including when the ideas are unfashionable. The think tank, the school, the formation pipeline, the organization that outlasts its founder – these are what convert a moment of attention into a durable transmission mechanism. The pipeline that produces Obama also produces Milei – when run in reverse. Build the pipeline. 4. Run the ratchet in reverse. Milei’s lesson. The ratchet clicks only one way – but only if you let it. Speed – act faster than the captured institutions can respond. Will – the absolute refusal to compromise with the consensus that produced the crisis. Preparation – the personnel, the plan, the intellectual infrastructure already in place before the political moment arrives. The first balanced budget in Argentina in over a century. Government ministries halved. Regulations abolished. The establishment that said it was impossible watched it happen. The ratchet is not a law of nature. It is a habit of the people who have been losing. Stop accepting it. Someone has to turn it. Milei did. 5. Capture the cultural layer. Gramsci’s lesson – applied in reverse. Culture precedes politics. The side that controls what is beautiful, what is admirable, what stories are told and how, controls what the next generation believes is possible. The right has been writing policy papers while the left has been making the films. Stop. Fund the artists who have something worth saying. Not propaganda – excellence. The standard the current system has abandoned. The film that is simply great and happens to reflect the values of life, freedom, and civilization. Beauty is not decoration. It is a civilizational argument. Make it. 6. Build the formation pipeline. The WEF’s lesson – applied in reverse. The Young Global Leaders program identifies people at thirty and forms them for decades. The counter-march needs the equivalent: the program that finds the next generation of civilizational builders, gives them the intellectual formation, connects them across borders, and sends them back into every institution. Not a secret network – a transparent one, everything the globalist project is not. The Council of Western Civilization. The formation school. The cross-border network of people who have been transmitted to and are committed to transmitting forward. 7. Have more children. Have four to six of them. So that you have them to spend most of your life transmitting to. A little tribe – so they can stick together, a small society of civilizational resistance and development. They can build together. They can give each other courage. They can transmit to each other what you transmitted to them. Maybe even a dynasty. The civilization that stops having children has already decided, at the most fundamental level, that the future is not worth bringing people into. Reverse this – not as a policy but as a personal civilizational act. The family is the smallest and most durable counter-institution available. It is where the first transmission happens – the values, the stories, the sense of what is worth admiring and fighting for. Every child born into a family that knows what it is and says so is a link in the chain the long march is trying to break. The large family is not a lifestyle choice. It is a civilizational statement. And possibly the most radical one available. 8. Transmit deliberately. Poland’s lesson – and the deepest one. The nation that disappeared from the map for a century and came back, not because it had an army or a state, but because the language was transmitted, the culture was transmitted, the sense of what it meant to be Polish was passed forward in the family, the underground school, the poem memorized in secret. The family came first. The nation followed – because a nation is nothing more than families who share a transmission, who pass forward the same stories, the same values, the same sense of what is worth defending and what is worth building. Start with the tribe you have built. The dinner table, the poem read aloud, the history explained, the book handed from parent to child, the conversation that continues across years until the child knows what they have inherited and why it matters. Then the tribe connects to other tribes – the school you chose (or built), the community you built, the network of families transmitting the same things in the same direction. And from there, the nation. Not the administrative state – the living nation, the people who know what they are and say so. The state can be taken. The transmission cannot be stopped if the people doing the transmitting refuse to stop. This is how civilizations survive. Not through governments or armies or institutions alone – but through the unbroken chain of people who received something worth passing forward, and passed it forward deliberately, to specific other people, one generation at a time. The torch changes hands or it doesn’t. The choice is always personal before it is political. Tell the truth. Have courage. And build. — The long march took a century. The counter-march will not – because the distribution revolution has compressed the timescale, because the managed reality is visibly failing, because the preference falsification is ending, because the proof of concept is running in Argentina and the question is being asked by US senators about Poland. The window is open. The tools exist. The vocabulary is spreading.
1
23
“The year, with fickle pulse, Weary of bloom, begins to live for fruit. Hope now is born at turning of the tide, And spreads her hue along the gauzy lines Of spider webs between the blades of grass.” — ‘The Turn of Summer’ by Augustus Radcliffe Grote (1841-1903). #AutumnEquinox
13
119
3
395
4,776
Replying to @RockChartrand
Without strict limitations on government power and guaranteed rights for the people, a democracy is just the tyranny of the mob and is as abhorrent as any other authoritarian system.
4
14
154
WHAT A GRIFT Why are taxpayers giving CCA money to the tribes? Because the Climate Commitment Act was written that way. Washington’s cap-and-invest law does not send allowance auction revenue into the general fund for the Legislature to spend on hatcheries, river monitoring, or anything else a majority of voters might prefer this week. The statute tells agencies where the money has to go. One of those destinations is tribal governments. The law, not a one-off grant RCW 70A.65.230 says the Legislature intends that at least 10 percent of CCA investments go to programs, activities, or projects “formally supported by a resolution of an Indian tribe,” with priority for projects “directly administered or proposed by an Indian tribe.” A project can count toward both that 10 percent floor and the separate 35–40 percent target for “overburdened communities.” The Climate Commitment Account itself lists “activities to support efforts to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change affecting Indian tribes,” including capital projects for tribes facing sea-level rise or flooding. The statute says the Legislature intends to dedicate at least $50 million per biennium to that purpose. There are also tribal capacity grants so tribes can consult on CCA spending, write more grant applications, and build climate projects. Commerce and Ecology have layered additional tribal-only programs on top of the statutory floor: Tribal Clean Energy Grants, Tribal Climate Resilience, and the Tribal Electric Boats Program. That last one is the $4.75 million that set off the latest argument. In March 2026, Commerce awarded it to five tribes for electric or hybrid vessels and charging gear. Quinault got $352,639 for a 24-foot all-electric research boat. Samish got $886,361 for a 26-foot all-electric landing craft. Colville got $1.137 million for an all-electric work/tour boat. Lummi and Swinomish each got $1.187 million to repower commercial boats to hybrid diesel-electric, not fully electric. Only federally recognized tribes or tribal enterprises could apply. A non-tribal charter operator, commercial fisherman, or county sheriff’s marine unit was ineligible by design. What “taxpayers” are actually paying CCA revenue is not a voluntary donation. Allowances are bought by fuel suppliers, utilities, and other covered emitters. Those costs show up in gasoline, diesel, natural gas, and electricity. Households and businesses pay them. The state then spends the proceeds under the rules above. Ecology’s FY2025 investment report covers about $1.5 billion of CCA spending in the 2023–25 biennium across 3,600 projects. Officials reported $55 million (3.7 percent) as supported by a tribal resolution, while arguing that far more went to tribes or to projects that protect treaty resources if you count other forms of tribal support. An earlier Ecology report said nearly $232 million, or 7.3 percent of CCA funds in that biennium, was directed specifically to benefit tribes, plus hundreds of millions more in salmon work the state says serves treaty rights. Commerce’s March 2026 tribal clean-energy package alone was $16.8 million, of which $4.75 million was the boat program. Separate Tribal Climate Resilience grants in the 2025–27 biennium include large Quinault relocation awards (one line item listed at $12 million) and repeated six- and seven-figure awards across many tribes. So the boats are not a hidden earmark. They are a small, visible slice of a larger statutory preference. The official story Commerce and the tribes describe the spending as energy sovereignty, treaty-era fishing rights, air-quality improvement, and decarbonization of marine engines. Quinault’s boat replaces a skiff the state said burned about 9,360 gallons of gasoline a year and will be used for habitat work and green-crab control. Swinomish’s chairman tied the hybrid repower to “the next seven generations.” The program was “co-created” with tribes. HEAL Act consultation language is cited as the process. That is the government’s answer to “why tribes”: the CCA is an environmental-justice and treaty-adjacent spending machine, and tribes are written in as both governments and priority recipients. The part that rankles WDFW is closing or starving hatcheries and cutting fisheries monitoring at the same time. Skamania Hatchery is shutting down. Omak production is on the chopping block. Monitoring on the Stillaguamish, Snohomish, and Skagit is thin enough that the department itself warns freshwater seasons may shrink. Those cuts come from the general fund and dedicated fish accounts, not the CCA pot. The Legislature did not write a path that lets CCA dollars backfill a steelhead hatchery just because anglers want it. So the contrast is real even if the accounting is separate: • CCA money must chase decarbonization, overburdened-community metrics, and tribal support. • Hatchery utilities, fish food, and creel surveys may be cut when the operating budget is short. • A tribal commercial vessel can get a seven-figure hybrid conversion. A non-tribal boat doing similar work on the same water cannot apply for that program. Calling all five boats “electric” overstates two hybrid repowers. Calling the grants “fraud” is a charge that still needs documents, not a slogan. The accurate complaint is narrower and harder: Olympia built a climate account that is legally easier to spend on tribal marine electrification than on the hatcheries and monitoring that keep the same fisheries open. That is why CCA money is going to the tribes. The statute requires a tribal share. Agencies built tribal-only programs to meet it. Taxpayers fund the auctions. The Legislature chose not to let that revenue compete on equal terms with WDFW’s core fish work.
26
75
5
180
3,429
We need to learn to differentiate. A country and its government are not the same thing. Here is the way to see it: a government is a mafia occupying a country. Sometimes a good mafia. Usually a bad one. That is not the point. The point is that it is not the country – it is something sitting on top of the country, extracting from it, and claiming to be identical with it. That claim is the oldest trick in politics, and we fall for it every time: criticize the government and you are told you hate your country. And the nation is something different again. The government is the apparatus of the moment – this decade’s officials, this year’s rules. The country is the land, the borders, the buildings, the cities, the ways people live together, the machinery. The nation is the people across time: the culture, the history, the memory – the dead who built it, the living who hold it, the unborn who will inherit it. Three things, constantly confused, deliberately. Poles learned the distinction the hard way, and we learned it twice. Under the partitions there was no country and no Polish government, and the nation survived anyway – in language, in churches, in kitchens, in poems copied by hand. Under the communists there was a government that called itself Poland while jailing Poles. Anyone who confused the two in 1981 was confused about who the enemy was. So the West should get comfortable with the sentence that follows: loving your nation and despising your government is not a contradiction. It is usually just accurate. Ask the British. They have now become a clear case of a nation and the apparatus governing it having so little to do with one another – a people whose history, humor and instincts are almost the exact opposite of what their state now does in their name. When a government arrests people for what they post and lets other things, horrible things go unpoliced, it is not expressing the nation. It is occupying it.
39
280
33
856
53,805