After all that, we'll deserve a drink and a mince pie (or three).

We'll end with a brief word from our resident #rightsoflight expert Lesley Webber on injunctions in the post-Coventry v Lawrence world.

... as well as a High Court decision about a pair of gates in Formby in Bradley v Heslin.

We'll also discuss the ongoing AGA saga in Tindall Cobham v Adda Hotels, a case on annexation in a nudist colony in Spielplatz v Pearson

We'll give an overview of 3 major Supreme Court cases - Arnold v Britton, M&S and Makdessi / ParkingEye

We are celebrating the festive season with a seminar this evening discussing the big cases from 2015 (and drinks afterwards...!)

Thanks to @legalcheek for the mentions legalcheek.com/2015/12/supre… You can read our analysis here fieldfisher.com/publications…

Great comments from partner Owen Talfan Davies in @Telegraph . Read our full analysis here fieldfisher.com/publications… xitter.cf/Fieldfisher/status/672…

It's been an exciting day for property litigators - read our team's analysis of the Supreme Court's decision here fieldfisher.com/publications…

(4) "... on the law of implied terms" See paragraph 31 of Lord Neuberger's judgment supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2…

(3) "those observations should henceforth be treated as a characteristically inspired discussion rather than authoritative guidance ...

(2) and Lord Neuberger takes the opportunity to poor cold water on the judgment of Lord Hoffman in Belize Telecom

(1) Much excitement for property litigators this morning as the Supreme Court clarifies there is no apportionment of rent paid in advance ..

Analysis of the M&S judgment from @FalconChambers1, home to Nick Dowding QC + Mark Sefton (acting for the landlord) xitter.cf/FalconChambers1/status…

You can hear more at our case law round-up on 10 December - don't forget to book your place!

M&S lose their appeal and Lord Neuberger takes the opportunity to play down the significance of Lord Hoffman's comments in Belize Telecom

Neuberger on Hoffman: observations shld henceforth be treated as a characteristically inspired discussion rather than authoritative guidance

Very important to distinguish between interpretation of a contract and implying terms into it. You cannot interpret what isn't there.