Nashville, TN
Joined March 2020
- Tweets947
- Following225
- Followers76
- Likes1.4K
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
Everything has become so expensive because the government won’t stop printing trillions of dollars.
It really is that simple.
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
Thank you, Thomas Massie.
Thank you, Ro Khanna.
I'm all for bipartisan efforts to expose depravity and seek accountability for evil.
Thank you.
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
“Elon, don’t start a rocket company. It will never work”
“Elon, don’t start an electric car company. It will never work”
“Elon, don’t start a political party. It will never work”
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
Are we about to witness the downfall of Waymo to the @Tesla's robotaxis?
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
🇺🇸 SEN. RAND PAUL: CONSERVATIVE? NOT WITH A $5T DEBT CEILING
"We have to judge the effects of the big, not-so-beautiful bill by looking at what happens to the debt next year.
Supporters of the bill admit it adds $270 billion to the debt next year.
That's the only thing we know for certain.
We don't know what happens in year 3, 4, 5, 6... but we know next year, this bill will grow the deficit by $270 billion.
In addition, the bill increases the debt ceiling by $5 trillion.
What does that mean? That is an admission that they know they aren't controlling the deficit.
They know that the ensuing years will add trillions more.
So we're adding $2 trillion this year, but they're anticipating adding more than $2 trillion next year.
That doesn't sound at all conservative to me."
Source: @Acyn
🇺🇸 HOUSE PANICS: THIS AIN’T THE BILL WE VOTED FOR
Some House Republicans are freaking out over changes in the Senate’s version of a debt bill they say looks nothing like what they passed in May.
Even though top GOP Reps. say it’s basically the same, other conservatives aren’t buying it and fear the Senate’s trying to jam them.
Oh, and it comes with a $5 trillion debt ceiling hike. So, no big deal.
The real deadline? Sometime between July 4 and whenever they run out of money.
Source: Fox News
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
Removal of funding for enforcement of federal contempt of court orders is the actual crux of this spending bill.
This is nominally aimed at removal of illegal immigrants, but obviously also enables many other abuses of power by the President.
Should this be allowed?
30%Yes
70%No
470,841 votes • Final resultsReaders added context they thought people might want to know
Section 70302 was removed from H.R. 1 on June 21, 2025, due to a Byrd Rule violation, as it prioritized policy over budgetary impact. It aimed to deter frivolous suits, but critics said it shielded executive overreach. Over 190 TROs blocked actions in early 2025. congress.gov/bill/119th-con… grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5… 5calls.org/issue/hr1-one-… govtrack.us/congress/bills…
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
A horrific massacre was committed by the Israeli army this afternoon against starving civilians as they tried to obtain food in northern Gaza.
So far, the number of casualties has reached 120, between dead and wounded.
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
Solar power is so obviously the future for anyone who can do elementary math
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
I’d vote for it if we got real spending cuts. But this bill is the largest debt increase in U.S. history—$5T.
That’s like giving your 16-year-old a credit card, watching them rack up $2K on booze and gambling, then raising their limit to $10K. Irresponsible.
Jimmy Feeman retweeted
Frankly, Elon should go scorched earth on Trump’s foundations and clear the path for a reformist moderate party that embraces tech, abundance, lean and constructive regulation, high skilled immigration, reformed educational standards, etc.
