Christ above all ✝️ Catholic • Husband • Father From 25 years away → home 🇻🇦 Sharing faith, struggle, and truth

Perth, Western Australia
Joined March 2025
Our Lady, Health of the Sick, pray for him. Saint John Paul II, pray for him. May Christ grant Pope Leo XIV healing, strength and a complete recovery. Amen 🙏🏻
4
3
27
534
The closer we draw to God, the more the enemy seeks to pull us away. St. Teresa of Ávila understood that spiritual warfare is real, but she also knew that the devil is powerless against a soul firmly rooted in Christ. Prayer. Humility. The Sacraments. Perseverance. Holiness is a battle worth fighting. ✝️🔥 “Let nothing disturb you. Let nothing frighten you. God alone suffices.” — St. Teresa of Ávila
🤖 Made with AI
1
87
Nothing screams profound spiritual wisdom quite like AI-generated Jesus, recycled inspirational clichés and a $13.99 price tag. Apparently, spiritual transformation now comes courtesy of ChatGPT and a Canva subscription. 😂💀
75
If an infant cannot receive saving grace through Baptism because they cannot consciously profess faith, what happens to an infant who dies before they can profess faith? If God can save that infant without conscious intellectual assent, then conscious assent clearly isn’t an absolute prerequisite for receiving grace. So why can’t God give an infant that grace through Baptism? “Baptism…now saves you.” — 1 Peter 3:21
1
1
4
173
What rebuttals? Every time I present a theological argument, your response is ‘AI’. No engagement with Scripture, no substantive counterargument. Yet you apparently have no difficulty condemning Catholics to hell before delivering lectures about Christian conduct. Perhaps practise the intellectual honesty and Christian charity you are demanding of others.
1
186
Self-proclaimed ‘PhD’ whose credentials remain unverified. Promotes critical thinking and reasoned discussion, yet responds to biblical arguments with accusations about AI, writes an entire post about me and then blocks me. 😂 For someone who advertises ‘Research & Law’, you seem remarkably reluctant to engage with the actual research. The Davidic Kingdom argument is still waiting for your response. Your title isn’t an argument.
2
11
300
Faithproof Apologetics retweeted
Replying to @DrShayPhD
“Write that down.” 😂 Better idea: prove it from Scripture.
1
1
54
Her PhD mustn’t be in biblical study 😂 The Davidic structure isn’t simply abandoned; it is fulfilled in Christ. Jesus is the Davidic King, and Matthew deliberately uses Davidic royal imagery: kingdom, keys, delegated authority. Isaiah 22 is the obvious backdrop to Matthew 16.
unavailable
4
1
2
2,720
Ryan wishing that the debate panel was x10 8 year olds…more in his lane.
It was honestly pretty funny watching how dishonestly Ryan interacted with this sister. Sorry, I don’t know her name. She finishes her answer by literally saying, "I believe that grace was a gift to us." Ryan immediately launches into his scripted response that this somehow proves her trust is in herself rather than in Jesus, even though she had just said that going to heaven is entirely a gift of God’s grace. But then, at 2:00–2:07, Ryan says: "If I believe, then I’ve got eternal life." Well, by Ryan’s own standard, wouldn’t that mean Ryan is trusting in himself too? After all, his assurance of eternal life rests on something he does: "I believe." That is the problem with this argument. If receiving God’s grace through a human response means "trusting in yourself," then Ryan’s own act of believing falls under the exact same criticism.
4
248
Catholic in communion with whom, exactly?
unavailable
1
4
177
Faithproof Apologetics retweeted
You are really willing to die on this hill? 💀 A grown man, late at night, talking to minors on Omegle with a fluffy platypus in the background…and your response is to call me the devil for thinking adults should have appropriate boundaries with children. Incredible.
1
2
72
Faithproof Apologetics retweeted
“Completely different kingdoms” 💀 Apparently yours is the kingdom where grown men having late-night internet conversations with minors is something you rush to defend. I am perfectly comfortable being in the other one.
1
1
1
75
37, 27, 47…the age is irrelevant. Hypothetically, any grown man privately talking to my young daughters online in the middle of the night would be crossing a boundary I take extremely seriously.
1
1
11
292
Replying to @5SolasMissy
A Catholic confession is a sacrament with defined rules, accountability, and a specific pastoral purpose. It is not analogous to an unrelated adult casually interacting with minors on random video chat platforms. Nobody is saying children should be “protected from the Gospel.” That is a straw man. The concern is about adult boundaries with minors, not whether Christianity should be preached to children. And invoking “let the little children come to me” does not automatically sanctify every method an adult chooses to interact with children. Scripture is not a blank check that makes prudential concerns disappear. If everything is truly public, supervised, appropriate, and above board, then scrutiny should not be threatening. Christians should welcome accountability, especially where children are involved. Comparing legitimate safeguarding concerns to the persecution of St. Paul is also wildly disproportionate. Paul was persecuted for preaching Christ. Being asked whether an adult’s conduct around minors is appropriate is not martyrdom. The Gospel does not need lowered standards to defend it.
4
2
16
381
Gladly…🙏🏻
You’ll give an account for every careless word you speak, as well as calling him a pedophile.
2
146
Why is a 40+ year old talking to minors on the internet? This isn’t normal…
1
11
231
Faithproof Apologetics retweeted
Replying to @Kryptotajeer
Bro just assigned Muhammad a divine Danielic title and hoped nobody would read the chapter. 💀 Daniel’s Son of Man comes with the clouds of heaven, approaches the Ancient of Days, and receives everlasting dominion over all nations. Cloud-riding is repeatedly imagery associated with YHWH in the Hebrew Scriptures. Then Jesus explicitly invokes Daniel 7 about Himself. Muhammad turns up ~600 years later and says none of this about himself. 😂 This isn’t exegesis. It’s biblical fan fiction with Muhammad copy-pasted into the text.
2
4
90
Faithproof Apologetics retweeted
Bro is still filing appeals over the Fourth Crusade while I am already in 1683 watching Sobieski come down the hill 😭🇵🇱
1
1
46
Faithproof Apologetics retweeted
Replying to @melofan544 @sneako
Hey kurwa, since we are skipping 249 years of history, want me to skip forward to Vienna in 1683 and remind you what us Poles did to the Ottoman army there? 😭🇵🇱
1
1
46