Truth (@FactChecker_UG) header
Truth (@FactChecker_UG) profile picture

Examining public claims, evidence and ideas. Religion, society and public affairs. Uganda and beyond.

Joined November 2026
Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)Photo by Truth (@FactChecker_UG)
“Now do you understand how easy it is to raise a dead body? I've raised at least four, so I know.” — Apostle Grace Lubega (Phaneroo Ministries International). Who were these four people? Is there independent evidence they died and returned to life?
10
6
3
13
10,495
Why are you singling her out?
Did Badenoch arrive by broom?
17
Going to church doesn't make you a good person!!
6
11
1
33
501
Do you know the craziest part? He says he has raised someone via the phone xitter.cf/factchecker_ug/status/…
Replying to @NabaasaInnocent
Do understand how easy it is to raise a dead body.. then in king oyo's vigil he called me few minutes before he died
20
I was genuinely thinking about this too.
This quoted post is unavailable.
33
You’re missing the point both logically and theologically. Your original claim was that people who’ve never given a shilling complain about giving. I replied that I HAVE given, but regret it because the teaching was wrong. You respond that “there are principles for giving.” Of course! How does that address what the conversation was saying? Sound biblical interpretation requires careful attention to words, grammar, context and intended meaning. If you cannot follow the argument in a simple exchange, I worry about how you’re approaching Scripture itself. And that is precisely my concern with much of the teaching we’re discussing. I hope others see the problem here. If we cannot follow a simple argument without changing its meaning, how carefully are we interpreting Scripture?
unavailable
1
21
If anyone at this church doesn’t see what’s wrong with this, then it is most sad. “Automatic defence” is exactly how people go astray.
Its on record duhh.. Come to Phaneroo grounds and get the evidence.
15
I personally regret a lot of past giving as it was based on wrong teachings.
unavailable
71
You’re right that miracles can be beyond human understanding. But we’re not asking HOW God raises the dead. We’re asking WHO was raised. The Bible names Lazarus in John 11, Tabitha (Acts 9:36-42) and Eutychus (Acts 20:9-12). These were real, identifiable people, and their families or communities knew them, and others witnessed what happened. If @Phanerookampala follows the example of Jesus and the apostles, can they provide the names of the four people Apostle Grace Lubega claims to have raised from the dead?
Replying to @SheilahGashumba
Trying to understand faith and Christianity with a human brain is chasing the wind. These things are way above logic.
1
59
Apostle Grace Raised a dead body on the phone.
This seriously needs to stop. Apostle Grace Lubega claims he RAISED A BABY FROM THE DEAD after 20 minutes without a pulse. He says the baby was about to be placed in a mortuary vault when he came back to life, minutes after Lubega prayed. This supposedly happened at Naguru Hospital. Yet even the mother's testimony on Phaneroo's own website doesn't fully match his story. WHERE IS THE MEDICAL EVIDENCE? Was this child ever medically confirmed dead? Is there any independent proof that a resurrection actually happened? You cannot stand on a pulpit, make claims this extraordinary, and expect nobody to ask for proof. @Phanerookampala - can you substantiate this claim?
37
I absolutely know who he is, and have listened to him. You’re so stuck up on your ways to recognise how prideful your response is. Respond to the argument itself. Since you ask for a human response, you cannot interpret a single verse as given to make a doctrine from it. Doctrine requires consistency of an assertion throughout scripture. Jesus teaches against an eye for an eye in fulfilling the law of Moses, and the early church teaches against God or anyone destroying another. One doesn’t have to know the teacher of a message to recognise it is theologically false
unavailable
39
This is an “argument from authority”. State your objection to the argument. I use AI here because the questions posed are so fundamental that frontier AI models in 2026 will give proper answers.
We have really lost the wonder of letting the Holy Spirit teach us Scripture to start asking AI to give us mysteries it doesn't know Yet the very AI tells you that it makes mistakes so you make sure you double check
1
115
You're shifting the discussion. Many of us love to see this, it puts a smile on our faces. We are against misleading biblical teaching and false miracle claims.
Replying to @JackieImmy
You're shifting the discussion. Many of us love to see this, it puts a smile on our faces. We are against misleading biblical teaching and false miracle claims.
31
Truth retweeted
No. Equating criticism of a pastor with an attack on the heavens is not consistent with biblical teaching. Scripture treats leaders as fallible servants under Christ, the sole head of the church. Paul publicly rebuked Peter. The Bereans tested even apostolic teaching. Elevating any human to that level risks the personality cult the New Testament warns against.
1
1
7
I wish people at @Phanerookampala would take moment to examine scriptures they claim daily if they’re consistent with proper biblical interpretation. You’d realise how completely misled you are
No. "Best worshipers in the world" is a subjective opinion, not a verifiable fact. No objective standard ranks choirs that way. The verse is a near-quote of Proverbs 23:7 (KJV: "For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he"), but it is misapplied. In context it describes a stingy host whose true calculating heart differs from his polite words. It is not a general claim that thinking something makes it true.
1
228
👀
I think it’s wrong for a human to claim to have raised 4 men from the dead!
83
46
5
498
36,401
This is one of Apostle Grace’s biggest theological errors: confusing salvation with worldly well-being. Salvation brings forgiveness, grace and sanctification. It does not guarantee wealth or success. Believers and unbelievers alike can prosper, suffer, fall sick or live in poverty. When you confuse these things, people begin to see poverty or suffering as inconsistent with being born again. Worse, they start looking for spiritual solutions to problems that often require ordinary human effort, medicine or practical decisions. Salvation is not a guarantee of worldly success. @Phanerookampala please correct your doctrine. You’re misleading many.
Don’t forget where you came from.
1
42
The timing is astonishing. Just as people are asking serious questions of the preacher, the congregation is being reminded to repent - how convenient. Repentance is biblical. But using spiritual language to make people feel guilty for questioning a preacher is something else entirely. It becomes a subtle means of control. What saddens me is how difficult this is to see when you’re immersed in it. Once your eyes are opened to the pattern, it’s painful to watch. This is very sad. @Phanerookampala
Remember who you are, turn back to the person you know you supposed to be 🙏 #PhaneeooSundayService
23
Let's make it easier -this one can be confirmed before GIC: What are the names of the 4+ people Apostle Grace claims he rose from the dead? I promise I'll be there once you tell me. xitter.cf/FactChecker_UG/status/…
Now this shows you didn’t fully understand me child of God. That very proof you’re looking for is at GIC, just attend and leave the rest to us. Your presence will highly be appreciated 😇 #GIC2026 #Phaneroo
1
1
50
This feels clever, and feels like a cheap 'win' but you did not answer the question. Where is the proof these miracles happened? xitter.cf/FactChecker_UG/status/…
First attend GIC then we get back to this. Thank You! #Phaneroo #GIC2026
1
2
51