Same goes for CF. Remember they said they would not run pools now they run 6 pools. The Cardano Foundation said on the K Parameter - “The k-parameter plays an important factor in keeping the Cardano blockchain adequately decentralized and encourages ada holders to delegate to a wider number of pools.” Now that there is an info action on K they are voting No to increase it. Why, because they know the community isn't paying attention and won't hold them accountable.

The @Cardano_CF dRep vote on the gov info action on K is baffling... minPoolCost and CIP-50 are not substitutes. A lower fixed cost helps a small pool that already has stake. It does not move stake off a saturated pool. CIP-50’s leverage cap ships unset it next hardfork. It does nothing until a later vote turns it on. Waiting for both seems like another stall tactic. stakePoolTargetNum or K is the parameter that can be changed now. IOG modeled as safe, and the Cardano Foundation itself described as what pushes ADA toward a wider set of pools. Cardano’s story was never “let the pools that got there first keep the saturation point.” It was a soft cap, to be raised in large steps, so no pool stays the best place to park stake forever. The K=1,000 step that was scheduled for 2021 is the one still sitting on the table. No more excuses, no more delays!