跟我预想的差不多，每年 1500 亿-2000 亿的开支。大概这个战争想赢还需要 5-8 年左右的样子。如果能提供，先夸的应该是俄罗斯。如果提供不了，那就是新的国土划分了。
我不相信泽连斯基用战争经费满足私欲，但是我不相信其他乌克兰人，因为目前已经因为贪腐抓了好几个了。
另外，无人机可以做到骚扰，但是无人机做不到土地占领，所以最后还是要靠地面部队。所以没有美国的支持，泽连斯基欧洲跑断腿也没啥用。。。。。 – at El Monte, CA
🚨🇺🇦🇪🇺🇷🇺 Zelensky puts a figure on war with Russia:
"The war will cost 155 billion euros next year.
And we need at least 70 billion euros more from you: for defense, for weapons, and for our resilience.
This is a realistic amount. And I ask you to find this support. It will help us hold Russia back.
There are some very simple facts. We stop most Russian assaults on the front line thanks to drones. We cut Russian supply lines with these technologies. And our drones are helping to weaken Russia’s economy.
Right now, we could produce 2-3x more drones, depending on the type. But we simply don’t have enough money for that.
It’s true. Just imagine if we could put 2-3x times more pressure on Russia than we do today."
Writer: Michael
你就说欧盟有 ball 没 ball 吧。 到头来反倒被中国卡脖子。。。。 – at North El Monte, CA
欧盟拟以解除一项对华制裁，换取中方解禁ASML关键供应商
10月14日，据彭博社报道，欧盟正与中国协商，拟解除对一家中国企业实施的贸易制裁（该企业涉嫌协助俄罗斯对乌战争），以换取中方解除对一家德国企业的制裁，这家德企是荷兰光刻机巨头ASML的关键供应商，眼下因中国制裁面临倒闭危机。
据悉，中方制裁的德企 Sindlhauser Materials GmbH 专注于精密制造和先进涂层技术，业务涉及半导体等行业。由于高度依赖中国稀土及关键矿产，中方今年7月将其列入出口管制名单后，公司供应链受到严重冲击。德国联邦政府及巴伐利亚州政府已协助其寻找替代供应商、回收现有材料并寻求资金支持。
报道指出，中方制裁的官方理由涉及相关企业与台湾的关系，但欧洲官员担忧，北京通过关键矿产出口许可制度，已掌握全球供应链及外国企业客户信息，甚至能够识别欧洲半导体产业的薄弱环节。此事也暴露出欧洲在供应链情报及关键原材料多元化方面的不足。
欧盟与中国近期在北京会谈时讨论了相关安排，并同意加强出口限制信息共享及预警机制。若双方最终达成“一对一”解除制裁协议，或将为未来类似争端提供范例。
此次谈判凸显中欧经贸关系的现实困境：欧洲既要维护对俄制裁立场，也必须保障关键产业供应链安全。
小林哥记 retweeted
Elon Musk gave Ukraine Starlink within hours of the invasion and saved the front line, while European politicians who built nothing comparable in years now lecture him on how to run his own company.
Sikorski asks the "big man" if Elon is "playing politics with his products again."
The facts are straightforward:
On February 26, 2022 two days after the invasion Ukraine’s Mykhailo Fedorov posted on X asking Elon for Starlink. The same day Musk activated the service. Terminals arrived within days. SpaceX donated thousands (including 3,667 via the USAID partnership) and covered service costs for months while others were still talking. Ukrainian commanders have repeatedly said the front would have collapsed without it.
Elon Musk stated publicly: "No matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals. We would never do such a thing or use it as a bargaining chip."
Europe has relied for years on American private technology instead of building its own alternatives. It is easy to criticize the man who actually acted when it mattered most.
Elon is not your government official. He builds, risking his own capital. The rest write posts.
马斯克的说明和我之前的推文完全一致。 – at El Monte, CA
Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.
Starlink is a commercial service owned and controlled by SpaceX. Usage of Starlink is limited to civilian or defensive activities and cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.