Primum non nocere

I used AI (ironically) to produce these images of what I believe will be the dystopic future of medicine. If you know anything about IoMT (internet of medical things), neuromodulation, BAN (body area network), & "normative reference databases", one can easily extrapolate and infer the targeted destination for a One World Health Network. Pharmacy store kiosks will replace doctors using advanced sensors and scanners to diagnose and dispense medication. No empathy. No assistance. No motivational interviewing. No conversation. - Just a terms of agreement and a bill. Oh how we will miss the days of humanity. #humanity #AI #futureofmedicine #Psinergy #IoT

Default stolen device protection ON? @Apple First of all Apple-defined familiar location doesn’t work. I’m in my own house and the phone is telling me it’s not in a familiar location. No wonder you want to pressure users to update to your dungeon control system.

Palantir is a compliance engine.

Finally everyone is talking about Palantir.

When docs say “yeah AI will help doctors but will never replace us”….

Some believe it’s already in use. And if you believe informed consent matters to the medico-profiteers seeking to charge you a yearly subscription for daily electrolyte adjustments, I’ve got a vaccine I’d like to sell you — not that I’ve seen it stated, just likely use-case.

Hasta la vista, baby

As a doctor, I do not support this...

Douglas Murray turned out to be a prolific grifter.

Nostradamus' Century 1 Quatrain 3.

Transcript from my presentation on The Technostate Timeline Pt. 1 This is meant to be an introductory presentation (target audience being healthcare workers) on terms and concepts with more on the main players coming in Pt. 2. "I wanted to gather a small audience for a discussion on a timeline of major events to expect in the development of the technostate. With the ultimate terminus of this ever-developing scheme being the pinnacle of aspirations for the elite - The Panopticon. I’ll first go over some terms to introduce this concept." "So along with that, as I mentioned there are some terms that I would like to share with everyone. And unfortunately this is part of the obfuscation where there’s a lot of different terms used that you could almost say carry the same meaning. I’ll just go over a few of them here. The point of this obfuscation is to make it difficult to nail down a single term that we are going with collectively, inhibiting proper discourse on these matters." "So what they do is they kind of saturate the research and the formal documents on this stuff with different terms like symbiotic autonomous systems, biodigital convergence. That’s a popular one. Transhumanism we all know that one. Posthumanism, human 2.0, human machine symbiosis, augmented or ambient augmented humans, cyborgization, algocracy, WBAN or whole body area network, digital twin, brain computer interface." "What else do we have? Internet of everything. Of course that includes the Internet of medical things, the Internet of things, the Internet of nano things, and of course the Internet of everything encompasses all of that. Technocracy, obviously the title of this presentation. So maybe we can go over a few of these definitions just to start." "So symbiotic autonomous systems, this is a term meaning systems where humans and autonomous tech co-exist and enhance each other in a seamless partnership. This is heavily detailed in the IEEE white papers 1-3, the first one released 2017, the most recent release in 2019. This is a very, very big topic that is discussed in those papers we can get to shortly. Biodigital convergence. This means the integration of biological and digital realms into a single hybrid existence. So, very similar terms. You see how they do this. Transhumanism, the ideology of transcending human limits through technological fusion. Let’s see, what else can I give you? Human machine symbiosis, a mutually beneficial relationship where humans and machines evolve as one. You see all these definitions mean the same thing. And again, this is all part of the plan to ensure that we are not having broader conversations about potential consequences or unforeseeable circumstances that can come from these monumentus advancements in human civilization. Human 2.0, a next generation human defined by deep seamless tech augmentation. So I can go on and on right? Let’s see probably a good one to give you too is, like, let’s get the formal definition of technocracy. And let’s also get, because I’m sure many have not heard of the term algocracy or datacracy. But these are a few definitions that mean ultimately a similar thing. An algocracy refers to a system of governance or societal management where decision making and authority are primarily driven by algorithms, data, and automated processes rather than human judgment or traditional democratic structures. The term combines algorithm and -cracy, meaning rule or government suggesting rule by computational systems." "Why since 2023 when chatbots became ubiquitous among the general public has there never been an open conversation on how this tech would be regulated in terms of laws or ethical implications? - those being the two main cruxes of why anyone would care about it's acceleration." "This is part of the obfuscation - to make it difficult to nail down a single term we can collectively use to discuss these matters. So they saturate the research and formal documents with different terms like symbiotic autonomous systems, biodigital convergence, cyborgization, transhumanism - all relating to or circling the same ideas." "An algocracy refers to a system of governance or societal management where decision making and authority are primarily driven by algorithms data and automated processes - not human judgment or traditional democratic structures - suggesting rule by computational systems." "They’re looking forward to having all of your thoughts centralized - all your hopes needs dreams and essentially anything that even theoretically can be distilled into data - centralized and stored in a database where a digital twin in cyberspace will be what drives the economy in an increasingly digital world." "The plan is to start with healthcare because they know it’s the perfect guise for introducing such revolutionary plans that if detectable or overly obvious would create mass resistance. Not only that but we’re already using health care services like telemetry and computational scans (i.e. Siemens Healthineers) feeding data into their normative databases." "While the horizon has been set at 2050 current activity is significant and much will be accomplished by the next decade. The S.A.S. white papers aren’t published for mere hypothetical projections, they are blueprints with measurable milestones already grounded in today’s reality." "From S.A.S. white papers I - 'As smartphones become more effective and eventually indistinguishable from ourselves we will evolve into a species that extends into the internet with the next step awaiting us in the coming decade'." Pt. 2...