It’s very possible that FLOCK is just a SACRIFICIAL company for absorbing ATTACKS and their is secret partnership with AXON for data laundering of cities personal data and the 30 day deletion is all fake. 👀🚨 and Axon is sitting on a massive database of vehicle location data that they obtained through their partnership with Flock data that was collected under Flock's data retention policies (30-day rolling deletion) but may now be permanently stored in Axon's cloud.🚨👀 On Flocks blog post explicitly states there was a integration "allowed for the automatic transfer of Flock-derived evidence into Evidence.com. 🚨 Now Flock's policy is to delete data after 30 days. But when Flock data was integrated into Evidence.com and Fusus, copies of that data were created in Axon's cloud. When Flock deletes its copies after 30 days, does Axon delete its copies? Axons API severance suggests Axon stopped receiving NEW data, but what about the historical data already in Evidence.com?🚨 If Axon retained historical Flock data in Evidence.com and Fusus, and if that data is now being used to train Axon's AI models , has effectively stolen millions of Americans' location data and is using it for commercial AI development without consent. —— Why this matters? 👀🚨 Now look at what happened in State of Washington Jose Rodriguez's public records requests. 🚨 Cities told courts they could not produce the records because Flock's 30-day deletion policy destroyed them. They paid $300,000 in settlements. Sedro-Woolley paid $40,000. Stanwood paid $40,000. Everett paid $25,000. 🚨 But here is the contradiction that nobody has caught: If Flock data was automatically transferring into Evidence.com, then copies of that data existed in Axon's cloud, independent of Flock's 30-day deletion policy. Evidence.com is an evidence retention platform. It is designed to preserve data, not delete it after 30 days⚠️👀 When those cities told courts they did not possess the records, they may have been wrong. The records may have been sitting in Evidence.com the entire time. Either those cities lied to courts, or they did not know their own evidence platform contained the records they were being sued for.👀 But it gets worse. Look at Flock's behavior. Flock's Vice President of Litigation, Michael Goldsticker, sent emails to city attorneys coordinating efforts to deny the public records requests. Flock was actively helping cities fight disclosure of records that Flock's own system was deleting.👀 Now ask yourself: Why would Flock help cities deny records requests if those records still existed in Axon's Evidence.com? 🚨 Because Flock knew the records were in Evidence.com, and Flock did not want anyone to look there. If someone looked in Evidence.com and found the records, it would expose the fact that Flock's 30-day deletion policy was a sales pitch, not a technical reality. The data was being copied to Axon's cloud, and neither Flock nor Axon was disclosing this to the municipalities or the courts.🚨👀 Flock and Axon collectively allowed cities to pay $300,000 in settlements and incur legal costs while the data may have been sitting in Evidence.com. 👀 🚨 — Now look at Axon's ACEIP program. Axon's own privacy notice says ACEIP "enables us to use Customer Content from participating customers to develop and improve current and future products. Flock data was flowing into Evidence.com through the API integration, that data became Customer Content. If any of those municipalities were enrolled in ACEIP, Axon was using Flock-derived vehicle location data to train Axon's proprietary AI models. Axon's ALPR products are now being sold to municipalities that just fled Flock. Those Axon ALPR products are powered by AI models that were trained on Flock's data axon.com/legal/cloud-service… cascadiadaily.com/2026/aug/2… @HawleyMO @RepThomasMassie

BEWARE ⚠️ of Axon “TROJAN HORSE” , Flocks twin👀🚩 are NOT different companies. Axon and Flock apparently executed a coordinated market staged corporate divorce. Their companies broke up publicly, but the data didn't break up in order to bypass state-level bans.🚨👀 They divided the market. Flock acts as the lightning rod for civil liberties outrage, absorbing the lawsuits, while Axon quietly monopolizes the municipal police tech sector by selling the same underlying surveillance capabilities under the guise of "privacy controls.🚨 now Axon is piloting face recognition in body cameras in Canada. 🇨🇦 In 2020, Axon integrated Flock into Evidence.com. Axon was sitting on Flock's board/investment. In 2020, Axon made a strategic, minority investment in Flock Safety and integrated Flock's "Vehicle Fingerprint" technology directly into Axon's Fleet 3 in-car video system and Evidence.com cloud. they helped Flock build the ALPR network using their sales team They pulled out abruptly, immediately launched a competing ALPR product, and are now swooping in on Flock's canceled contracts👀🚨 - In 2019, Axon’s own AI & Policing Technology Ethics board explicitly banned the development of facial recognition technology, citing severe privacy concerns and racial bias⚠️ But then In 2025 and 2026, Axon began quietly piloting facial recognition technology in body-worn cameras with a police department in Canada, completely reversing their 2019 ban Axon made a surprise decision in July 2025 to end the API partnership, saying open collaboration is "no longer in Axon's best interests". That Axon won't support new mutual customers starting July 24, 2025. Axon helped siphone the ALPR data into Evidence.com. But when public backlash hit 2025/2026 (ICE access, officer stalking, 30-day deletion traps) They severed the API specifically to avoid being named in the impending wave of Flock civil rights lawsuits and class actions. By cutting the public API, Axon legally distanced themselves from Flock's daily surveillance operations. But the historical data Axon already siphoned into Evidence.com was never deleted now they pivoted to become the "safe, privacy-focused alternative," sweeping up Flock's canceled clients And positions itself as the "ethical" alternative, capturing the fleeing cities.👀👀🚨 Axon acquired Flock's ALPR data or architecture to train their own facial recognition models on this historical ALPR/facial data that they siphoned from Flock under the guise of the 2020 partnership. — More damning: is Axon is actively pushing to take over Flock's ALPR market. Axon CEO has gone on earnings calls talking about the massive influx of clients converting from Flock to Axon, boosting Axon's stock.🚨👀 So essentially Axon deliberately severed the API after their Evidence.com platform had ingested years of Flock ALPR data and vehicle fingerprints. Then staged the "breakup" to wash their hands of Flock's legal liability, absorb Flock's municipal client base by offering "ethical" ALPR, and quietly pivot to facial recognition by using the data they harvested from Flock to train their new models. 🚨 @RepThomasMassie investor.axon.com/2020-04-02… centralcurrent.org/syracuse-… flocksafety.com/blog/axon-pl… npr.org/2026/08/23/nx-s1-593… fox10phoenix.com/news/arizon…