ItsEliteExchanges

📰@Kris on Crypto.com's Listing Process #CROFam We have a very sophisticated listing process; it's one of the most robust frameworks of any platform out there. It's fully compliant and built to protect the users of the @Cryptocom platform. I think the way it should be done is the community should be pushing the projects to criteria rather than pushing the platform to list it faster. I'll give you some ideas; this is not an exhaustive list, by the way, and I don't deal with listing of coins. I don't touch this process; I think it's very robust and it's done. If you look at all the other platforms, we have a track record of listing quality. Look at the tokens that have been listed on other platforms in the last 12 months which were non-performing, and some of them raised hundreds of millions of dollars in VC funding. Are the teams committed to holding their tokens and not selling them over a long period of time? These and about 100 other conditions are met in order for us to list the project and protect the community. Take the effort that you're putting into trying to force platforms to list and apply this level of pressure on the projects themselves, and those that are delivering will get listed. There's a set of requirements; exchanges want high-quality products, their projects. It's not a question of us not wanting to list it; we want to list every single quality project we can. Specifically for Cronos, we are committed to listing all the high-quality projects that are delivering. Really have a hard look and benchmark these projects against what's out there and see if it's good enough. If it's not good enough, push them harder and then we will list it. Please, everybody take that to heart, not just for us but any platform you're working with. Look for quality projects; make sure you have all the signals that they're good projects.

Your cat of the szn? 😺