I spent 6 days reading papers for my review. Found 24 studies. Read & felt productive. "So what's the actual gap?" my supervisor asked. I froze! Reading papers and identifying gaps are two VERY different skills. Nobody teaches you the second one. So I built myself a simple table based on Robinson et al.'s research gap identification work. Four categories. That's it. Insufficient Data → Less studies or tiny samples Quality Issues → Bias, weak methods, poor controls Mixed Results → Studies pointing opposing directions Wrong Focus → Right topic, missing characteristics I started filling this out WHILE reading. Not after. Every paper now gets tagged with a gap type and specific details. My future self stopped hating my past self. Try it with your next 5 papers. You'll spot patterns you missed before. 💬 Comment "Research Gap" to receive the complete workbook with step-by-step instructions. ------------------ Share to help your academic network 🔄 Repost And Click @RaziaAliani + follow + 🔔 I test AI tools to simplify your #research & #analysis (& 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮)

I keep this list of 40 websites bookmarked for research papers. Save it to save hours ⤵️ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹𝘀 PubMed Central - Medical research JSTOR - Academic journals arXiv - Preprints in sciences Google Scholar - Start here 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗢𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 DOAJ - Quality open journals CORE - Millions of free papers bioRxiv - Biology preprints SSRN - Social sciences 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 ResearchGate - Connect with authors Semantic Scholar - AI search Sci-Hub/ Unpaywall - Finds free versions Research4Life - Access for developing countries 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 EThOS - UK theses Internet Archive - Historical documents SciELO - Latin American research OpenAIRE - European research --------------- 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹? 1. 🔄 Retweet (& like) 2. Follow @RaziaAliani to get useful Research content 3. Join 16K+ researchers & get FREE exclusive tips on using AI in research 🔗in bio