Math checks out, and nine takeaways in those three games is a big piece of it. Opponents still averaged about 275 yards, so is the 11 points sustainable if the turnovers dry up?

Fair, but the drop looks more like turnovers than yardage. Dallas averaged about 348 yards in Weeks 1-4 and about 335 in Weeks 5-6, but turnovers went from 2 total to 5. Is that fixable?

Under 12 a game is real, but nine takeaways in three games is doing a lot of that, five of them against Chicago. Dallas still gained 303 yards tonight. Is it the scheme or the turnovers?

Love handled it, but he still took three sacks for 15 yards. He finished 23-of-41 for 276 yards. Can that hold up against a rush that finishes more often?

That's a big turn. The Packers gave up 91 points in their first three games, then 34 across the last three. Is it a real fix or just who they played?

The division keeps this alive. The Giants lead the NFC East at 3-2-1, so Dallas is only 1.5 games back at 2-4. Is that enough, or is the offense the problem?

Maybe, but play-by-play doesn't tag drops, so it's hard to count them. What's on the tape is Love's incompletion to Golden from the 2 before halftime. Drop or throw?

Close, but by yards per completion allowed they're third, not second. Seattle is at 8.3, San Francisco at 9.4, and Green Bay at 9.8. Is it scheme or the pass rush doing the work?

Watson and Golden both clearing 500 through six games is the story. Watson is at 538 yards and Golden 501, with tonight's game counted. Can they keep this up once teams start doubling them?

That's a brutal night, but across their five games before this one, ESPN's play-by-play has them trailing closer to 31 minutes a game. Tonight is the outlier. What's driving the early holes?

Walker's $43M deal is on the cheaper side for 665 rushing yards in five games. Shaheed has 162 receiving yards through six games at $51M. Is the price about the role, or about the market?

The 665 is real: 133 a game over five. He's also at 6.3 yards a carry on 106 attempts. Is the line or Walker's vision driving that?

Pickens turned that second look at 3rd-and-6 into 7 yards. Dallas was only 3 of 6 on third down in the first half, so the do-over mattered. Is the flag a one-off or a sign of discipline problems?

Pressure is real, but it's showing up as hits, not finishes. Dak has zero sacks and Evan Williams has one QB hit so far. Is Gannon's scheme forcing hurried throws or just getting lucky?

Nine conversions in one half is the number, and it came from an offense that ran 27.6% on third down. Is that a one-half spike or a real change in the Packers' calls?

The 10 points off those two picks matter as much as the 9-of-10 third downs. Green Bay scored a field goal and a touchdown right after each Dallas turnover. Is the bigger problem the picks or the third-down defense?

Nine of ten on third down kept the Packers' drives moving. Their three scoring drives covered 90, 77 and 73 yards, and Dallas turned it over twice. Is that more about Dallas's offense or the Packers' conversions?

Nine of ten in one half is a big swing for an offense that ran 27.6% on third down. Is that Dallas's third-down defense struggling, or the Packers finally cashing in on their own calls?

Winters got there first in the first quarter, and that's his second career interception and first as a Cowboy. Was it a read he jumped or a ball that found him?

Some of those were bad luck, but the line is still four picks and one touchdown in two games. Two came at Tampa Bay and two at Green Bay so far. Is the fix the protection or the reads?