Eduard Blacquière retweeted
Thanks for having me @FriendsofSearch!
Such an awesome conference for SEOs in Amsterdam, highly recommend. The trip has been a lot of fun.
Special thanks to @EdWords, @gerkmulder and the rest of the team for having me.
#FriendsOfSearch
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
AI assistants get whatever search engines give them as grounding context and sift through that so feel free to file the 99% of the latest AI visibility studies under "SEO".
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
I keep losing track of our tools and demos so I made a list: dejan.ai/tool/
Algoroo
Tree Walker
Brand Relevance
AI Rank
LinkBERT
Auxy
Citation Mining
Query Deserves Grounding [Google]
Query Deserves Grounding [OpenAI]
AI Content Detection
Query Fanout Generator
Typosquatting Checker
Content Substance Classifier
AI Flux
Google Brand and Intent Detection
Penguin – Link Optimization Tool
Chunk Norris
Google Entity Search
Brand AI Sentiment
Gemini Token Probabilities
Model Optimization Loss Landscape
Cosine Similarity Visualisation
(I probably forgot something.)
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
Hot take: Y'all are just rediscovering SEO by way of "AI SEO" or "GEO"...
Everyone's acting like optimizing for LLMs is an entirely new discipline that we need to do ASAP. It's not.
Let's clarify a few things:
Two different mechanisms:
1. Getting mentioned by an LLM (no URL) = Being in training data
2. Getting a URL cited by an LLM = Ranking in search results
For # 1 it's a popularity contest. The more you appear online in contextually relevant discussions, the higher your odds of being baked into the model's outputs. "Brand mentions are the new backlinks" thinking applies here.
For # 2 👏 Every 👏 Single 👏 URL 👏 you see in an LLM output comes from a search engine API (Google or Bing)
LLMs ARE NOT INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS (been trying to tell y'all this for years..)
So, when you hear or say things like:
"LLMs aren't citing Reddit URLs as much" → Reddit's search rankings dropped (or G's &num=100 removal impacted this)
"LLMs fall for spam listicles" → These rank well in search (unfortunately)
"LLMs prefer fresh content" → Search engines prioritize recency
You're not discovering AI behavior patterns. You're rediscovering SEO!
I'm tired & just trying to help 😅 ....it's also the last day to join my last AI Course of 2025 if you wanna level up & evolve your AI SEO thinking, hit me up. 🚀
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
🍺 The AI Hangover Has Begun 🤕
The sun is rising & a migraine has started rooting in your frontal lobe
The symptoms are everywhere:
🚫 Enterprise reality check: MIT's "The GenAI Divide" study found 95% of organizations getting zero return on GenAI investments
🤖 Moving goalposts: Even Sam Altman now admits AGI is "not a super useful term"... after years of using it to secure billions at astronomical valuations
⏰ Broken promises: "Revolutionary" features quietly pushed from "coming soon" to "maybe never"; from Google's AI glasses to Project Starline to OpenAI's GPT-5 reasoning breakthroughs
🦾 Agent fantasy crumbles: Salesforce's research shows AI agents achieving just 35% success on multi-step tasks across 4,280 real-world scenarios
🧰 Your Hangover Recovery Kit:
• Question everything: Who's building this tech and why? What happens when systems fail? Where is your data going? AI boosters rely on your self-doubt to push their narrative.
• Demand real evidence: A flashy demo isn't proof of transformation. Test systems with your specific real-world challenges (outside of demo examples) before investing time or resources.
• Beware of misleading language: Challenge vague terms like "agents" & track how goalposts shift; just as "AGI" is now quietly being abandoned after serving its fundraising purpose.
• Think like an engineer: Get crystal clear on what steps are required to accomplish a specific task before attempting to automate or augment it with AI.
• Identify AI-supported content wins: Use AI to analyze large datasets. Successful content marketers are mining thousands of Reddit conversations and customer reviews to uncover patterns impossible to find manually.
• Strengthen human advantages: Develop what AI can't replace; authenticity, strategic thinking, relationship management, creative problem-solving, and ethical judgment.
• Skip the gimmicks: Prioritize sustainability over novelty. Your cat photo doesn't need to be "turned into a human" using AI & focus on applications with genuine impact.
🏆 The winners emerging from this hangover will be sober, clear-headed professionals with an experimental mindset who methodically test AI applications against specific problems. While everyone else sleeps this off.
Start small. Embrace failure. Ask questions.
This is how AI progress happens! Not through intoxicating hype cycles, but through disciplined experimentation + critical thinking.
The recovery starts now. And if you're ready to think clearly about AI's real potential while others nurse their headaches, you're already way ahead of the curve. 🚀
Eduard Blacquière retweeted

Mic King@VeryWellVersed3 Jul 2025
United States
United StatesConnected via WebAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
We got some early data from @Similarweb on user behavior in AI Mode vs. classic search. 100k users from 5/20/25 to 6/19/25.
Although user adoption is low (only 2%) early patterns are emerging...
The disparity in referral traffic between the two channels is immense, but the average page views for referral traffic from AI Mode is higher than that of classic search and it is climbing rapidly.
Check out @garrettsussman's post for more: ipullrank.com/referral-patte…
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
This came up during my chat with Jerrel Arkes and Mike Rhodes on the B2B podcast from Friends of Search. AI is changing not just how we search—but how we sell.
🎧 Watch the full episode : youtube.com/watch?v=ks8ed4X7…
#SearchMarketing #AI #GenerativeAI
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
Great point by @jes_scholz
@FriendsofSearch
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
This is an impactful slide from @randfish overlay your audiences sources of influence against your budget. This is gonna hurt a bit but we should all look at this.
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
Google Search confirms it's requiring JavaScript to block bots and scrapers:
“Enabling JavaScript allows us to better protect our services and users from bots and evolving forms of abuse and spam....”
Link to coverage via @martinibuster : searchenginejournal.com/conf…
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
Last month we announced the 24 hour view in the Search Console Performance reports, and we got lots of positive feedback and feature requests. Today, we’re making the export button available for that view (one of the most requested features): the ability to export data on an hourly basis for the last 24 hours. Enjoy the new data! 📈
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
I'm delighted to announce the #SEOFOMO News: Your Real-Time Source for SEO and Digital Marketing news 👇👀
SEOFOMO News is a news community designed for SEO and digital marketing professionals to stay current with the latest industry developments in real time, created to complement the newsletter.
My mission with SEOFOMO News is to make it easier for the SEO community to follow essential updates as they happen, all in one place, without the distractions and spam of generic social media platforms. We’ve designed this platform to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio by prioritizing high-quality content and fostering insightful discussions around the industry’s most impactful stories.
In addition, SEOFOMO News is a space where you can not only follow up but also contribute with relevant SEO news, updates and resources you can submit, as well as engage in thoughtful discussions with other SEOs in a positive, moderated environment.
Check it out and start submitting and engaging now: news.seofomo.co/
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
AI will kill Google. Not happening at the moment. Zeer interessante talk van @EdWords over core updates.
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
Replying to @EdWords
@EdWords mag #seobenelux afsluiten met een talk over bedreigingen voor SEO’s
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
You really can't trust any statistics on the internet.
Found a stat about AI, followed the sources, eventually landed on a gated research report from 2020.
The stat was used for articles in 2024 by a university site, Forbes, and other sites that didn't bother fact checking.
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
Did you know that a page must be publicly discoverable (it needs to be indexable) as well as sufficiently popular to be considered for inclusion in the CrUX dataset? @victorpan just shared the usually overlooked criteria for CrUX methodology: developer.chrome.com/docs/cr…
PS: I remember a while back when some sites even blocked access to their pages for users of certain regions that they didn't target to avoid these interactions being taken into account (!) So important to clarify that this is not necessary, nor recommended (and ends up being a bad user experience).
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
An open letter to the folks in Google Search:
Listen, I know you recieve a lot of criticism. No matter who you rank on top, folks are likely to complain. I also know you're fighting an army of spammers and over-optimized content that threaten the quality of search results. I get it
But let's also recognize that consistently ranking a site #1 will lead to commercial spam on that site and worsening results.
Whether it's Reddit or Forbes, folks will see easy money, and now you're fighting another moving target.
Do we think Forbes should rank #1 for "best crypto exchange" alongside "best cbd gummies" along with "best headphones" and 100s of thousands of other "best" keywords? 🤔
Does the "brand" of Forbes equate to product expertise?
When we look at these pages, we don't see the evidence of personal experience and expertise that you demand of smaller publishers. There's very little evidence that they've actually used many of these products. If we're being honest, these results seem worse than the "unhelpful" content you fought to reduce. What gives? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
When we see Forbes and Reddit over and over again, it doesn't feel like Google is "searching" anymore, but instead, you gave up to serve the McDonalds of search results with 2-3 items on the menu.
Here's what we'd love to see instead:
1) Increase site diversity, so we see different sites with more focused expertise
2) Apply the same content standards of "Helpful Content" to big and small sites alike (you know the standards I'm talking about)
3) Reduce any punishment of sites with small brand footprints. I understand your intentions here, but not every well-researched site has a real-world presence. (and turn down this signal for big brands, as it encourages bad behavior)
I've seen what you are doing with Helpful Content and applaud much of it. You could improve Google search if you applied these principles more broadly while relying less on the brand, which has become less reliable over time.
Thank you for listening.
Eduard Blacquière retweeted
Here is a list of best articles, analysis and tools on the latest Google Search API Leak, I will continue to update. Feel free to add other resources
Must Read & Watch:
- How it all started sparktoro.com/blog/an-anonym… by @randfish
- The Google API Leak Should Change How Marketers and Publishers Do SEO sparktoro.com/blog/11-min-vi… by @randfish
- Secrets from the Algorithm: Google Search’s Internal Engineering Documentation Has Leaked ipullrank.com/google-algo-le… by @iPullRank
- Unpacking Google’s massive search documentation leak searchengineland.com/unpacki…
- How SEO moves forward with the Google Content Warehouse API leak searchengineland.com/how-seo… by @iPullRank
- The original leaked document github.com/yoshi-code-bot/el…
Analysis:
- digitaloft.co.uk/what-does-g… comprehensive analysis about backlinks and what does it mean for link building / digital PR related activities from @oliviaday__ and @BrockbankJames
- Leveraging Google’s Content Warehouse API for Structured Annotation, Semantic Analysis and Feature Tagging blog.marketmuse.com/google-c… by @jeffrey_coyle
- Impact on News Publishers xitter.cf/JShehata/status/179587… by @jshehata
- Local SEO According To The Leaked Google API Documents localseoguide.com/local-seo-… by @localseoguide
Utilities
- googleleak.com: This is pretty cool. Search and filter the data based on several criteria
- 2596.org by @hodsonated searchable criteria and added "AI Overview" of each
- Google Leak Reporting Tool wordlift.io/google-leak-repo… by @cyberandy
- Google's Ranking Features Modules Relations ranking-features.streamlit.a… by @natzir9
- Here is a searchable list dixonjones.com/google-rankin… by @Dixon_Jones
did I miss anything
10 Actionable Steps for News Publishers Leveraging Leaked Google Algorithm Insights to Boost Rankings and Build Authority
News Publishers should pay attention to the recent #GoogleLeak. Read my extensive summary at xitter.cf/JShehata/status/179585…
10 Actionable Steps for News Publishers:
The leak of Google's internal algorithm documentation provides critical insights that can significantly impact SEO strategies for news publishers. Here’s a detailed analysis of the impact and actionable steps for news publishers:
1. Focus on original, timely content (Content Freshness and Originality): The leaked documents highlight the importance of freshness and originality. News publishers should strive to
- break stories first and provide unique angles on current events. Or Publish breaking news quickly and update existing articles with new information as it becomes available.
- Implement a strategy for regularly updating evergreen content to keep it fresh. This includes updating old articles with new information
- Monitor trends and create new content around trending topics.
- Use structured data to indicate publication and last updated dates.
- Submit XML sitemaps regularly to ensure Google indexes your latest content promptly.
2. Prioritize user engagement (User Behavior Metrics): The leak indicates that user engagement metrics like click-through rates, time on page, long clicks, and bounce rates may directly influence rankings.
News publishers should focus on
- crafting compelling headlines & meta descriptions to entice clicks,
- providing interactive content
- ensuring fast page load times,
- providing clear calls to action
- providing highly relevant content (top/related/recent articles) to generate second click and keep readers engaged
- Focusing on readability and user experience to increase dwell time and reduce bounce rate
- Optimizing internal linking to guide readers to more articles
- Promoting content on social media and other channels to drive traffic and engagement
3. Optimize for author expertise (Authority and Trustworthiness): The documents mention that author information is captured and processed, particularly for news articles. News publishers should:
- ensure articles have clear author bylines
- work to build up the reputations and expertise of their journalists
- Optimize author pages with detailed bios, credentials and links to their other work may help establish authority
- Feature content from well-known and credible authors on Homepage
4. Build Brand trust and credibility: Although E-E-A-T (Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) isn't explicitly mentioned as a ranking factor, the leak suggests that Google maintains whitelists for sensitive topics. News publishers must continually work to:
- bolster their credibility through accurate, and well-sourced reporting.
- Include their correction policies, managing staff, editorial standards, contact us, and about us on site with clear links in footer
5. Invest in brand building: Brand-related signals appear to play a role in rankings, according to the leak. Well-established news brands may have an inherent advantage. Publishers should work on:
- increasing brand awareness through marketing efforts, and building a loyal reader base.
- Secure mentions and links from authoritative sources
- Encourage social media sharing and engagement
6. Monitor click data: If the leak is accurate, click data may be used to assess the relevance and authority of individual pages. News publishers should closely monitor:
- click-through rates (CTR) from search results
- Bounce Rate
- Dwell time or Article Scroll Depth
7. Adapt to vertical-specific factors: The documents suggest that ranking factors may vary by vertical, with potential customizations for news-related queries. Publishers should stay attuned to any news-specific SEO best practices that emerge and adapt accordingly.
8. Avoid Demotion Pitfalls: Various demotion signals, such as anchor mismatch and SERP demotions, can negatively impact rankings.
- Ensure all links are relevant and contextually appropriate
- Avoid practices that could lead to SERP demotions, such as manipulative linking or poor navigation.
9. Monitor Link Quality and Diversity: Links remain a critical factor, with a focus on quality and diversity. News publishers should aim to earn diverse and authoritative links from reputable sources.
- Regularly audit the link profile to ensure quality and relevance
- Focus on earning backlinks from reputable sources and avoid low-quality link schemes.
10. Improve Technical SEO Factors: Factors like indexing tier and proper content structuring are highlighted.
- Ensuring technical SEO best practices, such as proper indexing, mobile optimization, and fast loading times.
- Avoid excessive keyword stuffing and maintain clean URL structures.
It is getting harder and harder for emerging and small news sites:
Increased Competition: If user engagement metrics like clicks and dwell time become even more crucial, established news brands with large audiences may have an advantage. Smaller or newer publishers might struggle to compete for visibility.
Focus on Brand Building: The emphasis on brand recognition and authority could make it harder for emerging news outlets to gain traction in search results.
YMYL Scrutiny: As news falls under the Your Money Your Life (YMYL) category, Google's increased scrutiny on these topics could lead to stricter evaluation and potential demotions if content doesn't meet their quality standards.









































