For the unaware, a pxp announcer as part of managing broadcast flow at times indicates with non-verbal gestures to their partner that “I’m deliberately pausing. I’m not finished with my description, I’m letting an important moment breathe and you should too.”
What’s the difference between your “thumb on scale” wording that aligns more with your own opinion and a network’s re-editing of a video to encourage a desired perspective. Gotta keep the wording of your poll questions neutral to avoid unintended influence on opinion.
Total thumb-on-scale wording. Agree w firing but “humiliating” is a trigger word. Gotta keep your opinion out of polls q’s to steer clear on influencing results. “Should Scott Pelley have been fired for the manner in which he interacted with his new boss in front of co-workers?”
Second reminder I’ve had of the great DYL this week. Interesting comp between JFK jr and Albert Brooks
It’s BECAUSE of this kind of on going visual feedback that has helped calls incrementally improve over the years. ABS challenges have added to that improvement via immediate feedback of an ump’s zone. A couple challenges early in a game will help the ump calls rest of the way.
She clearly mis-hit the ball and reacted at the end of her grunt with what amounted to an “oh no”. Her body language shows that too, surprisedthat it still went in. Watch the original live view and not the replays of it that don’t always have all the same mics being recorded.
Command Center was only place to see DeBoer frantically calling for timeout on their opening drive. And got it. Rest of the world wondering what happened.
