Guys, @bot created an agent telephone support line with @xai voice in ONE DAY for my @shopify store. It can check order status, make modifications, loop in a human rep and provide information about our products to callers. We've never had phone support and our customers will finally be getting it soon without us breaking the bank.

Okay, this is wild... I gave Grok Bot a photo of my credit card. It figured out what I needed for work, found the best deal, and added it to my Amazon cart. I didn't even pick the product. 🤯

BREAKING: Starlink ranks #1 for both download speed and Consistent Quality in rural UK, beating EE, Three and Vodafone in Opensignal’s study. Starlink also leads rural download speeds in all 14 European markets studied.

Introducing Grok Voice 3.0, the world’s most intelligent speech-to-speech model. It excels at resolving customer calls, responds in under a second, and costs less than other frontier models.

An email from [email protected] landed in my inbox, passed SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and had the blue check Something felt off, so I asked @bot to do a security review. It found a hidden phishing link, explained why every safety check passed, wrote a report to xAI - including proposed fix!

The scale of SpaceX satellites is getting absolutely insane Each generation roughly doubles or more in deployed size Starlink V1.5: ~11 m V2 Mini: ~30 m V3: ~60 m AI1: ~75 m wingspan - first-generation orbital AI compute satellite

Grok Bot is now more proactive. What does that mean? Here's one example: I switched flights, but @bot noticed I didn't update my Uber reservation Bot realized, then pinged me to update the reservation *during* my connecting flight I had @starlink, so I was able to change it before I landed and save myself a headache

Dragon separates from Falcon 9’s second stage

I find it funny that some people got hung up on Starship not having gone orbital before Flight 14 when in the grand scheme of things it was completely arbitrary in terms of performance. The 19ish second burn only added about 91 m/s of velocity (a 1.2% increase in velocity) This capability has been physically capable since Flight 6 which demonstrated a single Raptor relight in space. Heck, Flight 13’s burn was about 14 seconds, but intentionally oriented to primarily do a plane change instead of a prograde insertion burn for continued safety. Any of the relights COULD have done the orbital insertion burn, the duration was not of any special technical capability. The reason Starship didn’t go orbital until Flight 14 is probably what we should applaud them for the most… SAFETY. Their methodical approach to getting good data and going one step at a time while hucking the single most massive object ever put into space proves they weren’t just doing things haphazardly, despite the occasional narrative from the outside. While it’s easy to compare Starship to vehicles like SLS or Vulcan or New Glenn, the reality is the focus hasn’t been on orbit, it’s been all on the “downhill” side of that. Safe and targeted de-orbit, clean reentry, targeted and soft splashdown. That’s the part that has (almost) never been done before. And here I do have to add a little Space Shuttle admiration for figuring out a lot of these things on its first flight in 1981 (although it came a bit close to not being successful). Pretty amazing there was a vehicle of similar scale capable of such precise deorbit and reentry that it landed on a runway with no go-around capabilities. Crazy. But Starship is well on a path to absolutely leap-frog the Space Shuttle in terms of performance (already over double and someday 6 fold) and hopefully in terms of full and rapid reuse. I hope we see the latter part speed up even more now that orbit has been demonstrated. Exciting times ahead!!! Keep going @spacex @elonmusk

Three Falcon rockets vertical at three of our launch pads in Florida and California → spacex.com/launches