Follow your passion without forcing the outcome Loquendi libertatem custodiamus
Barcelona
Joined April 2009
- Tweets3.3K
- Following76
- Followers146
- Likes46.6K
Not often the Truth is spoken at UN
🔥 RARE MOMENT OF TRUTH AT UNITED NATIONS: As world leaders used the UN podium to condemn Israel, we invited courageous Yemeni journalist @JustLuai to tell the truth: “Our problem in the Middle East is neither Israel nor the Jews. It is the Islamist dictatorships.”
o ti vaccini o ti licenzio - reato di estorsione, art 629 del codice penale
👁️
“Voglio farvi sentire una sentenza inappellabile… come un rap, una sentenza precisa, emessa da una persona che sulla base della Costituzione e delle norme vigenti, questo ci dice :” 👇❤️
(grazie a @Saibra80 per questo documento di Vittorio Sgarbi che è di vitale importanza per il futuro di tutti noi)
Non c'e' differenza vera tra socialismo, comunismo, fascisimo e nazismo.
Sono tutte dittature dove lo stato ha diritto di decisione sulla vita dei cittadini
That is exact and we can draw a parallel with the Jews situation in the 1920ies in Germany... at the beginning some restrictons, then more, then violence, then ghetto, then concentration camps...most thought, at every steps, that it could not get worse...
At first, Jean-Pierre did not understand.
He watched the evening news, paid his taxes, voted responsibly and believed what respectable people told him.
1. France needed immigration because the economy needed workers.
2. Diversity was an opportunity.
3. Public services were under pressure because they lacked funding.
4. Disorder at school was caused by inequality.
5. Crime statistics required context.
6. Anyone who connected these things too quickly was probably an extremist.
Then his children started coming home from school saying they could barely hear the teacher.
Half the lesson was spent restoring order.
Teachers changed constantly.
Some simply disappeared for weeks.
Jean-Pierre complained once, politely.
The administration explained that the situation was “challenging” and that the school was developing an “inclusive pedagogical response.”
Jean-Pierre went home reassured.
There were professionals dealing with it.
His neighbourhood changed too.
Shops closed.
Others appeared.
Groups of men occupied the same corners every evening.
His wife stopped taking one street after dark.
Jean-Pierre noticed all of this, but he had also learned that noticing patterns was dangerous.
So every event remained an isolated event.
One closed shop meant nothing.
One assault meant nothing.
Ten incidents meant ten unrelated incidents.
Only a racist would connect dots.
Then his daughter was sexually assaulted by a man who had recently arrived in France.
Jean-Pierre was devastated.
But almost immediately he began policing his own thoughts.
The attacker was an individual. Of course.
One must never generalise.
The television explained that exploiting such crimes politically was irresponsible.
A minister warned against “stigmatisation.”
Jean-Pierre found himself nodding through tears.
What had happened to his daughter was monstrous, but the truly frightening possibility, apparently, was that somebody somewhere might vote for the wrong party because of it.
Nothing changed.
His son’s school became worse.
His daughter stopped going out alone.
His wife wanted to move.
The police were exhausted.
The teachers were exhausted.
The hospitals were exhausted.
Jean-Pierre was exhausted.
Yet every explanation he had been given required him to believe that each deterioration was temporary, accidental, exaggerated or caused by something entirely unrelated to the deterioration immediately beside it.
And whenever somebody proposed that perhaps the country had made serious mistakes — about migration, authority, education, policing, integration, punishment or borders — Jean-Pierre knew the correct answer.
“Careful. That sounds like the far right.”
So he remained reasonable.
He remained moderate.
He remained informed.
He remained completely incapable of drawing a conclusion from his own life.
So at first, Jean-Pierre did not understand.
And he still does not understand.
They can't ever give a precise answer...only fake headlines
“What piece of Misinformation has been seeded in the Minds of British people by Vladimir Putin?”
“I’ll ask you again - What piece of Misinformation was seeded in the Minds of British people by Vladimir Putin?”
“I’ll ask you again - What piece of Misinformation was seeded in the Minds of British people by Vladimir Putin?”
MUST WATCH & SHARE
He can’t answer because the whole premise is just another LIE
But soon you won’t be able to read this - and you’re only source of information will be the BBC & CNN
💯
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This quote is not from Elon Musk. A similar statement was posted by Steven Edginton in January 2026. x.com/StevenEdginton…
Pontida 2006
In Lega’s rally in Pontida, French women from Nemesis collective—standing before a backdrop slogan "The foreigner shall not pass" and an image of a sword-wielding Crusader—remove and cast aside burqas amidst the applause of the crowd. Muslims are angry and do not want this video to spread, claiming it is an insult to Islam.
