"Our sister"
This is a "discernment" outlet, folks.
Pray for our sister Nala, as she's going through some hard things, including the death of two family members and her father being sentenced to 20 years in prison.
See the story protestia.com/2025/10/17/nal…
JD Hall Vehemently Defending Nala Ray’s Christian Testimony (2-1-25)
youtube.com/watch?v=aFJiAtJ0…
JD Hall Had No Answer for This | Ezekiel 36 & the Modern State of Israel
youtube.com/watch?v=rMW7ZsiH…
It’s a repudiation of the gospel to be SKEPTICAL of someone like Nala Ray, according to JD Hall.
No need to be careful. Just accept them into the church, because they say “I gave my life to Jesus.” No evidence needed. Dead faith is good enough.
No shock to see one false convert defend another. These frauds abuse the Lord’s grace.
“Just shut up,” says JD. Everyone else has to shut up but him. That’s why he recently blocked me. He’s incapable of defending his initial rants against follow-up criticism.
Has JD revised this stance on her since her team-up with the “Talmudic” TPUSA?
The woman at the well wasn't painting and filtering up herself for her 2 million followers. She was living a humble, quiet life - unlike Nala. Not even remotely analogous.
Replying to @StandAndKnox @LostMyHats
The woman at the well would disagree with you about being quiet about Jesus when you have a sinful past. Anyone in Christ was dead as a door nail before they received mercy.
JD Hall: “The Great Awakening is Happening Right Now” (10-22-24)
youtube.com/watch?v=fY72XxjE…
JD Hall (who’s fallacious interpretation of Ezekiel 36 I recently exposed) identifies as a cessationist – meaning, he believes the apostolic “signs and wonders” stopped with the apostles. And yet, here he is talking about a “move of the Holy Spirit” like a charismatic.
Like every other false teacher and hypocrite of today, Hall speaks fondly of Jonathan Edwards, the face of the First Great Awakening. If Edwards were alive today, he’d be part of the NAR.
In “Thoughts on the Revival of Religion in New England, 1740,” Edwards reported spiritual activity that mirrors the Toronto Blessing and Brownsville Revival:
“There has, before now, been both crying out and FALLING DOWN in this town, under awakenings of conscience and in the pangs of the new birth, and also in some of the neighboring towns. In one of them, more than seven years ago, was a great number together that cried out and FELL DOWN under convictions; in most of which, by good information, was a hopeful and abiding good issue. And the Rev. Mr. Williams, of Deerfield, gave me an account of an aged man in that town, many years before, who being awakened by his preaching CRIED OUT ALOUD in the congregation. There have been many instances in this and some neighboring towns before now, of persons FAINTING with joyful discoveries made to their souls: once several together in this town. And there also formerly have been several instances here of persons' FLESH WAXING COLD AND BENUMBED and their HANDS BEING CLENCHED, YEA, THEIR BODIES BEING SET INTO CONVULSIONS, being OVERPOWERED with a strong sense of the astonishingly great and excellent things of God and the eternal world.”
According to JD Hall, what happened during the First Great Awakening spearheaded by Jonathan Edwards is “happening right now.” He therefore affirms (whether knowingly or not) the kind of “manifestations” regularly seen within the Bethel and Toronto Blessing crowd.
But again – Hall’s supposedly a “cessationist.” And yet, he’s basically no different than Michael Brown.
I’ve been saying for a few years that even the so-called “cessationists” are going the way of the false “signs and wonders” movement, prophesied in Matthew 24.
JD says he feels it “in the air.” Sounds like the NAR always talking about the “atmosphere.” And what does the Bible say the devil is the prince of?
“in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the AIR, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience”
Ephesians 2:2
The guy calling for "revolutionaries" and "agitators" has to create a safe space from my questions, because they expose his worldview.
When they don't have the upper hand, these conservative "Christians" resort to the same tactics their enemies do.
Questions he refused to answer:
1. How much is a punctuation mark worth, theologically speaking? He made the case a period can't be worth 80 years, so I'd like to know how much time he ascribes to a period. Is it his position that periods mean "no time"?
2. He relied on a period added by translators to assist in the interpretation of prophecy. Does he believe this is a legitimate biblical hermeneutic?
3. What is the "return" to the land in Ezekiel 36:24? The literal return from the Babylonian exile? Or a metaphorical/spiritual "return?" I don't need a long spiel. Is the former, or the latter? That's all I need.
4. He said on Tucker's show that God still promises to "save the Jews" in the end - which, ironically aligns with what I'm saying, not him. What is this future conversion he referenced? What promises in the Bible was he talking about?
"Ezekiel’s prophecy was fulfilled at Pentecost, not in 1948."
JD pretends like there's no such thing as near/far/dual fulfillment. And plus, I never said Ezekiel 36 was completely fulfilled in 1948. I just said it was a fulfillment of a particular verse - returning from "ALL THE COUNTRIES." They clearly have not been given a new heart yet, and are still in rebellion to God. The cleansing (144,000, Zechariah 13, etc.) is still to come. But a "period" makes that scenario impossible, according his hermeneutic that allows translator additions centuries later to interpret prophecy.
unavailable
It seems "It's about Jesus, take off your Jew goggles" is all JD has in response to anything Ezekiel 36 related.
unavailable
"But it’s funny to think YOU thought I was stumped by your question."
Yes. Because you don't answer them.
unavailable
Doesn't answer a single question, and calls me a "Moron." Is @LostMyHats a Zionist?
Replying to @LostMyHats @promuatn
Your spiel here is literally just a longer version of the answer you already gave back in June - i.e., "on the cross." Nothing new here. That interpretation makes no sense, and elaborating upon it doesn't make it any less wrong. You didn't respond to a single point in the video, and are doing exactly what the liberals do - assuming, mischaracterizing, diverting, filibustering, etc.
Questions you still have yet to answer (all of which are in the video):
1. How much is a punctuation mark worth, theologically speaking? You made the case a period can't be worth 80 years, so I'd like to know how much time you ascribe to a period. Is it your position that periods mean "no time"?
2. You relied on a period added by translators to assist in the interpreation of prophecy. Do you believe this is a legitimate biblical hermeneutic?
3. What is the "return" to the land in Ezekiel 36:24? The literal return from the Babylonian exile? Or a metaphorical/spiritual "return?"
4. You said on Tucker's show that God still promises to "save the Jews" in the end - which, ironically aligns with what I'm saying. What is this future conversion you referenced? What promises in the Bible were you talking about?
Questions he still has yet to answer:
1. How much is a punctuation mark worth, theologically speaking? He made the case a period can't be worth 80 years, so I'd like to know how much time he ascribes to a period. Is it his position that periods mean "no time"?
2. He relied on a period added by translators to assist in the interpretation of prophecy. Does he believe this is a legitimate biblical hermeneutic?
3. What is the "return" to the land in Ezekiel 36:24? The literal return from the Babylonian exile? Or a metaphorical/spiritual "return?" I don't need a long spiel. Is the former, or the latter? That's all I need.
4. He said on Tucker's show that God still promises to "save the Jews" in the end - which, ironically aligns with what I'm saying, not him. What is this future conversion he referenced? What promises in the Bible was he talking about?








