Fundamentals | Price action trader | order flow, statistics & education | Satoshi Speculator Zero Fee exchange - https://xitter.cf/t.co/28jUzhj80i
Joined May 2014
- Tweets5K
- Following987
- Followers2.3K
- Likes5.6K
Pinned Tweet
Day 1 – Patoshi Pattern
$QUBIC
There is a unique mining fingerprint in the first ~50,000 Bitcoin blocks called the Patoshi pattern.
It accounts for roughly 1.1 million BTC.
One miner left a very consistent, machine-like signature. This miner started at the very beginning of Bitcoin and stopped around the same time Satoshi disappeared.
In Feb 2025, Arkham formally added ~22,000 of these addresses to their official Satoshi Nakamoto entity.
xitter.cf/arkham/status/18868205…
Tomorrow we look at one of the most interesting addresses inside that cluster - 15ubic.....
UPDATE: $100 BILLION IN SATOSHI NAKAMOTO’S HOLDINGS NOW ON ARKHAM
We’ve added an additional 22,000 Satoshi addresses with a total BTC balance of 1,096,354 to the Satoshi Nakamoto entity on Arkham.
These are derived from a known mining pattern referred to as the Patoshi Pattern, and include the only (known) addresses from which Satoshi spent BTC from.
Day 36 – The Early cfb Handle
qubic-network:native
The original compilation says the handle cfb was already appearing on security mailing lists in the late 1990s.
Two archived posts match that claim:
1998, firewall-wizards list
From: cfb <cfb@ocn21.kdd-ok.ne.jp>
marc.info/?l=firewall-wizard…
1999, cistron-radius list
From: the same cfb address
marc.info/?l=cistron-radius&…
Both are technical security posts. The first discusses new US crypto / DMCA-era law. The second is about RADIUS logging and possible network compromise.
What can be said cleanly:
the handle cfb existed on security lists by 1998–1999
Come-from-Beyond has used that same short form for decades
this is not a signed proof that the 1998 poster is Sergey Ivancheglo
The Japanese mail domain is a real caveat. It could be a proxy, travel, or a different person using the same letters.
The research treats it as an early appearance of the same identity. Treat it as a handle match, not as a closed case.
Tomorrow we look at the Genesis address 1A1z and the Alpha & Omega reading.
Day 37 Here
xitter.cf/DunnazFlow/status/2097…
Day 37 – Genesis 1A1z
qubic-network:native
Bitcoin’s first coinbase sits at this address:
1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
Explorer:
mempool.space/address/1A1zP1…
Wiki background:
en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_b…
The first four characters are 1A1z.
The original compilation reads that as Alpha and Omega:
A = first letter of the Latin / Greek alphabet
z = last letter of the Latin alphabet
In that reading, Genesis is marked as the beginning and the end. That is the same framing already used later for Qubic: “the last crypto project, and the first actually.”
This is interpretation, not a proof. The address itself is a fact. The Alpha / Omega meaning is a later overlay.
What remains checkable:
- this is the Genesis payout address
- the coins from block 0 cannot be spent in the normal way
- CfB has repeatedly used first/last language for Qubic
A more technical take on the Genesis public key as a puzzle is here:
qubic.church/docs/03-results…
Tomorrow we look at the second early miner and the ~400k BTC cluster.
