Rob Finnerty of Newsmax asked Trump if he would be the "Disclosure President." Trump's ambivalent response gives LITTLE HOPE that he is planning to reveal anything: "I'm looking " was closely followed by "that particular subject is not high on my list." (He actually misspoke those words, but it's clear that was his meaning.) disclosurepress.com

Jason Colavito's review of Jay Stratton’s "Out of the Shadows" is a scathing critique that compares the memoir unfavorably with Lue Elizondo’s "Imminent." Its central argument is that Stratton offers extraordinary claims about nonhuman intelligence, recovered spacecraft, a secret Legacy Program, and alleged encounters involving his own family, yet provides little verifiable evidence. Colavito also questions Stratton’s reliance on a familiar circle of UAP researchers (Puthoff, Kelleher, Davis), his tendency to interpret criticism as a disinformation campaign, and the increasingly commercial relationship between disclosure advocacy and entertainment. He closes his review with a legitimate challenge: How can individuals claiming firsthand knowledge of extraordinary government secrets continue to offer testimony without producing the evidence necessary to substantiate it? jasoncolavito.com/blog/revie…

WOW!!! Former Secretary of Energy John Herrington went on @AlchemyAmerican and called out @BFree63 (Brent Friedman) from @hollywoodufos as a fabulist for concocting Brent's oft-told story about Harrington's alleged confession in 1981, in which Harrington was supposedly devastated upon learning the truth about aliens. Not sure who to believe. Brent seems credible, but Herrington was adamant. Would love input from those familiar with Brent's story. I do wonder why it took sooo long for Herrington to deny this story. It's been out there for quite a while.

WHAAAAT did David Grusch say on Joe Rogan last night? NHI are waging war against each other in our skies - and this leads to UFO crashes. WHAAT? Every week Grusch seemingly adds something new and more outrageous to his "disclosure." #Grusch #UFO #UAP #JoeRogan disclosurepress.com

In the final months of World War II, deep inside Nazi Germany’s secret weapons establishment, the SS was reportedly testing a machine unlike anything in the conventional arsenal. Its name was Die Glocke — “The Bell.” It stood roughly 10 to 12 feet high, contained two cylinders spinning rapidly in opposite directions, consumed enormous amounts of electricity and reportedly produced bizarre and deleterious effects on living tissue. After the Third Reich collapsed, the Bell’s fate became a tantalizing mystery. The man who brought this story to much of the English-speaking world was Nick Cook, Aviation Editor of Jane’s Defence Weekly, the most respected military and aerospace publication in the world. For more than a decade, Cook investigated the aerospace and defense establishment, covering military aircraft, advanced weapons systems, defense contractors and classified programs. He received multiple journalism awards from the Royal Aeronautical Society. Forbes, reviewing his investigation in 2002, described him as possessing “all the qualifications of a hard-nosed reporter.” That distinction matters because Cook did not set out looking for anything exotic. He followed the aerospace evidence—and it led him to antigravity. And the deeper he went, the further backward the trail seemed to lead. Cook’s investigation, eventually published as The Hunt for Zero Point, brought him to Polish researcher Igor Witkowski, who said he had been given access to interrogation records concerning SS General Jakob Sporrenberg. According to Witkowski, Sporrenberg described a secret project involving the Bell and a violet, metallic-looking substance code-named Xerum 525. When its internal cylinders were set spinning in opposite directions, the device reportedly produced powerful effects on nearby organic material. Plants deteriorated, liquids separated and living organisms died. Accounts attributed to prisoners within the Gross-Rosen concentration-camp system also described secret nighttime experiments and intense bluish light in the area associated with the project. Then came Sporrenberg’s most chilling reported revelation. As the Red Army approached, 62 scientists, technicians and other personnel associated with the project were allegedly killed to prevent the Bell’s secrets from falling into enemy hands. Cook was never able to examine the Sporrenberg records himself. Witkowski said he had been allowed to transcribe portions but not copy them. Rather than simply repeat the story, however, Cook traveled to Lower Silesia and investigated the locations himself. The trail eventually intersects with one of the most powerful—and mysterious—figures in the Nazi weapons establishment: SS General Hans Kammler. Kammler controlled underground weapons-production facilities and, by the closing months of the war, had acquired extraordinary authority over some of Germany’s most advanced military technology, including the V-2 program. The traditional account held that Kammler committed suicide in Bohemia on May 9, 1945. His body was never found. More recent research uncovered U.S. counterintelligence records indicating that Kammler was actually in American hands and questioned in May 1945. Precisely what happened afterward remains unclear. That matters because the United States was simultaneously engaged in an enormous effort to seize German scientific knowledge. Through Operation Paperclip and related intelligence programs, German scientists, engineers, documents and hardware were brought to America. Wernher von Braun and his rocket team eventually became central to the American missile and space programs. Nazi technology changed hands. The question Cook’s investigation raises is whether rockets were the only revolutionary technology that made the journey. During the 1950s, gravity control was not confined to science fiction. Major American aerospace companies—including Martin, Bell Aircraft and Convair—were investigating or discussing “electrogravitics.” And then there was Thomas Townsend Brown. Brown had spent years experimenting with high-voltage electrical systems and believed he had discovered a coupling between electromagnetism and gravity. His experiments produced measurable thrust: lightweight asymmetric capacitors subjected to extremely high voltages actually moved, an effect Brown believed represented electrogravitic propulsion. He wasn't simply proposing a theory. He had demonstrated an experimental effect and was trying to turn it into a propulsion system. In 1952, his Project Winterhaven proposed developing the technology into disc-shaped, electrogravitically propelled aircraft capable of extraordinary performance. The U.S. Navy took enough interest to investigate Brown’s work, while gravity-control research was gaining serious attention across the American aerospace industry. Whether Brown had actually manipulated gravity remains disputed. But the larger historical point remains: serious people in American aerospace were actively experimenting with unconventional propulsion. Then the public conversation largely disappeared. Did the research fail? Or did the physics become classified—and remain classified to this day? And then there is Charles Dellschau. This German-born immigrant living in Texas created hundreds of extraordinary illustrations depicting unconventional flying machines associated with a secretive group he called the Sonora Aero Club. Dellschau’s drawings depicted technology supposedly developed by the group during the 1850s and 1860s, including aircraft powered by a mysterious lifting substance called NB Gas. But one design is particularly difficult to ignore. Look familiar? Its bell-shaped generator, central axis and rotating internal machinery bear an uncanny resemblance to the technology later attributed to Die Glocke. Elsewhere in Dellschau’s drawings appears a spinning-drum apparatus associated with the same exotic propulsion system. And Dellschau was depicting this technology almost half a century before World War II. Why do stories separated by decades and an ocean converge on remarkably similar technology associated with unconventional flight? Now follow the chronology forward. Dellschau. Die Glocke. Kammler. Operation Paperclip. German scientists and technology transferred to America. American aerospace companies investigating gravity control. And then, almost immediately after the war, increasingly persistent reports of extraordinary flying machines in American skies. By 1947—just two years after the war ended—the flying-saucer era had begun. From that point forward, witnesses—including military personnel—would describe objects capable of extraordinary acceleration, hovering without visible lift and flight without conventional propulsion. Today, those same performance characteristics sit at the center of the UAP mystery, along with an extraordinary allegation: somewhere within the U.S. national-security apparatus exists a decades-old program attempting to understand—and perhaps reproduce—exactly this kind of technology. That brings us back to Nick Cook. Cook did not begin The Hunt for Zero Point trying to prove that UFOs were extraterrestrial spacecraft. He approached the mystery from the opposite direction: Could human beings have secretly developed propulsion technology far beyond the conventional aerospace paradigm? Following that question backward led him to American gravity-control research, the postwar transfer of German technology, and ultimately Die Glocke. Perhaps The Bell was wartime mythology. Perhaps it was a failed experiment whose capabilities became exaggerated. Or perhaps Die Glocke represents something far more consequential: an early chapter in unconventional propulsion research that survived the war, crossed into the United States during the exploitation of German science, and eventually disappeared into the black-project world. If that possibility sounds familiar, it should. Because nearly eighty years later, we are once again being told that somewhere inside the United States government and its defense contractors exists a deeply classified program studying extraordinary craft, unconventional propulsion and technology hidden from ordinary oversight. But if the secret U.S. program described by today’s UAP whistleblowers really exists, there is another question worth asking: How far back does it actually go?In the final months of World War II, deep inside Nazi Germany’s secret weapons establishment, the SS was reportedly testing a machine unlike anything in the conventional arsenal. Its name was Die Glocke — “The Bell.” It stood roughly 10 to 12 feet high, contained two cylinders spinning rapidly in opposite directions, consumed enormous amounts of electricity and reportedly produced bizarre and deleterious effects on living tissue. After the Third Reich collapsed, the Bell’s fate became a tantalizing mystery. The man who brought this story to much of the English-speaking world was Nick Cook, Aviation Editor of Jane’s Defence Weekly, the most respected military and aerospace publication in the world. For more than a decade, Cook investigated the aerospace and defense establishment, covering military aircraft, advanced weapons systems, defense contractors and classified programs. He received multiple journalism awards from the Royal Aeronautical Society. Forbes, reviewing his investigation in 2002, described him as possessing “all the qualifications of a hard-nosed reporter.” That distinction matters because Cook did not set out looking for anything exotic. He followed the aerospace evidence—and it led him to antigravity. And the deeper he went, the further backward the trail seemed to lead. Cook’s investigation, eventually published as The Hunt for Zero Point, brought him to Polish researcher Igor Witkowski, who said he had been given access to interrogation records concerning SS General Jakob Sporrenberg. According to Witkowski, Sporrenberg described a secret project involving the Bell and a violet, metallic-looking substance code-named Xerum 525. When its internal cylinders were set spinning in opposite directions, the device reportedly produced powerful effects on nearby organic material. Plants deteriorated, liquids separated and living organisms died. Accounts attributed to prisoners within the Gross-Rosen concentration-camp system also described secret nighttime experiments and intense bluish light in the area associated with the project. Then came Sporrenberg’s most chilling reported revelation. As the Red Army approached, 62 scientists, technicians and other personnel associated with the project were allegedly killed to prevent the Bell’s secrets from falling into enemy hands. Cook was never able to examine the Sporrenberg records himself. Witkowski said he had been allowed to transcribe portions but not copy them. Rather than simply repeat the story, however, Cook traveled to Lower Silesia and investigated the locations himself. The trail eventually intersects with one of the most powerful—and mysterious—figures in the Nazi weapons establishment: SS General Hans Kammler. Kammler controlled underground weapons-production facilities and, by the closing months of the war, had acquired extraordinary authority over some of Germany’s most advanced military technology, including the V-2 program. The traditional account held that Kammler committed suicide in Bohemia on May 9, 1945. His body was never found. More recent research uncovered U.S. counterintelligence records indicating that Kammler was actually in American hands and questioned in May 1945. Precisely what happened afterward remains unclear. That matters because the United States was simultaneously engaged in an enormous effort to seize German scientific knowledge. Through Operation Paperclip and related intelligence programs, German scientists, engineers, documents and hardware were brought to America. Wernher von Braun and his rocket team eventually became central to the American missile and space programs. Nazi technology changed hands. The question Cook’s investigation raises is whether rockets were the only revolutionary technology that made the journey. During the 1950s, gravity control was not confined to science fiction. Major American aerospace companies—including Martin, Bell Aircraft and Convair—were investigating or discussing “electrogravitics.” And then there was Thomas Townsend Brown. Brown had spent years experimenting with high-voltage electrical systems and believed he had discovered a coupling between electromagnetism and gravity. His experiments produced measurable thrust: lightweight asymmetric capacitors subjected to extremely high voltages actually moved, an effect Brown believed represented electrogravitic propulsion. He wasn't simply proposing a theory. He had demonstrated an experimental effect and was trying to turn it into a propulsion system. In 1952, his Project Winterhaven proposed developing the technology into disc-shaped, electrogravitically propelled aircraft capable of extraordinary performance. The U.S. Navy took enough interest to investigate Brown’s work, while gravity-control research was gaining serious attention across the American aerospace industry. Whether Brown had actually manipulated gravity remains disputed. But the larger historical point remains: serious people in American aerospace were actively experimenting with unconventional propulsion. Then the public conversation largely disappeared. Did the research fail? Or did the physics become classified—and remain classified to this day? And then there is Charles Dellschau. Beginning around the turn of the century, this German-born immigrant living in Texas produced extraordinary drawings of unconventional flying machines and their propulsion systems—years before the Wright brothers’ first powered flight. But one design is particularly difficult to ignore (Aero Club 1856 below). Look familiar? Dellschau depicted a bell-shaped “Generator Cone” associated with one of his unconventional propulsion systems. Its resemblance to the technology later attributed to Die Glocke is difficult to ignore. Curiously, the same basic form would surface yet again in 1965, when witnesses to the Kecksburg, Pennsylvania UFO incident described an acorn- or bell-shaped object that reportedly came down in the woods. Three remarkably similar forms, separated by decades. Coincidence? Now follow the chronology forward. Dellschau. Die Glocke. Kammler. Operation Paperclip. German scientists and technology transferred to America. American aerospace companies investigating gravity control. And then, almost immediately after the war, increasingly persistent reports of extraordinary flying machines in American skies. By 1947—just two years after the war ended—the flying-saucer era had begun. From that point forward, witnesses—including military personnel—would describe objects capable of extraordinary acceleration, hovering without visible lift and flight without conventional propulsion. Today, those same performance characteristics sit at the center of the UAP mystery, along with an extraordinary allegation: somewhere within the U.S. national-security apparatus exists a decades-old program attempting to understand—and perhaps reproduce—exactly this kind of technology. That brings us back to Nick Cook. Cook did not begin The Hunt for Zero Point trying to prove that UFOs were extraterrestrial spacecraft. He approached the mystery from the opposite direction: Could human beings have secretly developed propulsion technology far beyond the conventional aerospace paradigm? Following that question backward led him to American gravity-control research, the postwar transfer of German technology, and ultimately Die Glocke. Perhaps The Bell was wartime mythology. Perhaps it was a failed experiment whose capabilities became exaggerated. Or perhaps Die Glocke represents something far more consequential: an early chapter in unconventional propulsion research that survived the war, crossed into the United States during the exploitation of German science, and eventually disappeared into the black-project world. If that possibility sounds familiar, it should. Because nearly eighty years later, we are once again being told that somewhere inside the United States government and its defense contractors exists a deeply classified program studying extraordinary craft, unconventional propulsion and technology hidden from ordinary oversight. But if the secret U.S. program described by today’s UAP whistleblowers really exists, there is another question worth asking: How far back does it actually go? #DieGlocke #ThomastownsendBrown #Nazitech #Legacyprogram disclosurepress.com

WHAT THE HELL IS THIS THING FLYING OVER TEHRAN LAST NIGHT? Is it ours? Is it theirs? Or is it from some OTHER place? disclosurepress.com

Did Betty Hill actually draw an accurate map of the Zeta Reticuli star system? After Betty and Barney Hill's 1961 abduction by a UFO, they underwent hypnotic regression. Betty generated a map of a star system which she alleges was shown to her by the entities aboard the craft. Several years later, amateur astronomer Marjorie Fish asserted that the drawing was a representation of the Zeta Reticuli star system. That interpretation has been debated but her conclusion, as in all things UFO, remains contested. Look at her drawing below and compare it to a map of the star system. disclosurepress.com

The Pentagon says there is no record—present or historical—of a secret UAP program called “Immaculate Constellation.” The NSA, however, says it cannot even reveal whether it has records about it. Immaculate Constellation came to public attention in 2024 through whistleblower Matthew Brown, who alleged the existence of an unacknowledged Special Access Program created to collect intelligence on UAP and purported reproduction vehicles. His report was subsequently provided to Congress and entered into the record of a House UAP hearing, although its extraordinary claims remain unverified. The Black Vault’s John Greenewald then sought NSA intelligence records related to the alleged program through FOIA. The agency refused to confirm or deny whether any such records exist—and has now rejected Greenewald’s appeal, arguing that even acknowledging their existence or nonexistence could compromise classified intelligence information, sources, methods or activities. Importantly, NSA says this is its standard response to requests involving UFO/UAP intelligence records, so the refusal itself is not evidence that Immaculate Constellation exists. Still, it leaves a curious disconnect: one part of the U.S. government says it has no record of the program. Another says national security prevents it from telling us whether it has records about it at all. theblackvault.com/documentar… disclosurepress.com

The U.S. has just admitted it has weapons in space. So what else about what's happening in space haven't we been told the truth about? Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink has confirmed that the United States has “on-orbit space control weapons” already deployed. Not plans. Not prototypes. Weapons in orbit. The Space Force confirmed their existence—but won't say what they are. And perhaps the most revealing comment came from Meink himself: “We spend a lot of time talking about how we’re going to talk about these things.” Indeed. twz.com/space/u-s-admits-it-… disclosurepress.com

Twenty-five years ago, journalist Nick Cook proposed an extraordinary theory: Nazi SS General Hans Kammler survived the war, traded secret technology to the United States—and helped seed what would become the UFO Legacy Program. Now, Intelligence Community sources are telling Liberation Times a remarkably similar—but even more explosive—story. They allege Kammler became a key link between Nazi exploitation of recovered advanced technology—including the 1933 Magenta craft—and the postwar U.S. UFO Legacy Program. Kammler’s survival remains disputed. But American and British records raise serious questions about whether he actually died in 1945. Was Nick Cook onto something 25 years ago? liberationtimes.com/home/the… disclosurepress.com

Hi all, I just wanted to highlight one of the greatest talents covering these topics: @jason_samosa. If you’re not familiar with Jason’s work, his YouTube channel features extraordinarily deep and highly researched explorations of the Phenomenon and its related mysteries. He has opened doors and explored connections that, to my knowledge, no one else has previously pursued. Check out his video on the World Commerce Corporation—the first in a series. It is truly spectacular work. I’ve linked it below. I’m making this plug for his channel not because I know Jason nor have any connection to him, but simply because I believe his work is excellent and deserves a much larger audience. If you’re a curious person who enjoys following the evidence down fascinating and largely unexplored paths, I strongly encourage you to check out this channel. youtube.com/watch?v=75NPYdFX…

“Terrifying.” That’s the word investigative journalist Tom O’Neill says a Democratic congressional staffer used to describe evidence of “crafts and beings” he was shown inside SCIFs while working with the House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets. According to O’Neill, the material is so disturbing that congressional staffers who see it are offered psychological care to help them cope with information that “haunts” them. #uap #disclosure disclosurepress.com

What if the 2004 Tic Tac was launched from beneath the ocean? But not by aliens. Researcher Joshua Bertrand presents a remarkably straightforward alternative: a classified U.S. surveillance platform — and he says a strikingly similar system was being tested off San Diego at the very time of the famous Nimitz encounter. Bertrand points to LASH (Littoral Airborne Sensor/Hyperspectral), an experimental surveillance system reportedly tested in the San Diego area between 2003 and 2005. Its sensor was carried beneath a long-loitering buoyant platform capable of conducting surveillance over — and potentially beneath — the ocean. According to Bertrand, the balloon used in those tests was white, cylindrical and approximately 40 feet long — remarkably similar to Commander David Fravor's description of the Tic Tac. The attachment point for the sensor beneath the balloon could also potentially account for the small appendages Fravor reported seeing underneath the object. The encounter occurred inside a military operating area where multiple classified programs could have been underway simultaneously. Bertrand argues that Fravor, Alex Dietrich and the USS Princeton radar operators would not necessarily have been read into another compartmented test occurring in the same area. And what about the Tic Tac's seemingly impossible speed? Princeton radar operator Kevin Day has described multiple contacts repeatedly ascending and descending during the days surrounding the encounter. Bertrand argues that one object disappearing near Fravor while another appeared near the CAP point does not establish that a single object traveled between those locations at extraordinary speed; no radar track demonstrating that horizontal transit has been publicly released. None of this proves that the Tic Tac was a classified surveillance platform. But a submarine-launched, white, cylindrical, roughly 40-foot platform reportedly being tested in the same region, during the same period, makes this one terrestrial explanation that deserves serious consideration. #Nimitz #TicTacToe youtube.com/watch?v=q8I5ct6d…

In the latest episode of Mystery Wire @g_knapp @RonFutrell recap Robert Bigelow’s new podcast with George Knapp, plus Knapp’s on-air framing of Bigelow’s history, AAWSAP, and a reported February 2026 Oval Office meeting between @realDonaldTrump and @RobertTBigelow. Bigelow launched the Bigelow Podcast in August 2026 with Knapp as the interviewer. Knapp is both the journalist closest to him and a participant in that story. The man who put an inflatable habitat on the ISS says he walked into the Oval Office on Feb. 6, 2026 with seven briefing packets. One of them was UFOs. He asked Trump to say a single sentence on the way onto Air Force One: “A non-human intelligent presence has been on Earth for a very long time… with performances completely beyond our capabilities and our human physics. He told Trump to stop there. No craft photos, no bodies, no contractor names. Just confirmation. On February 19, 2026, two weeks after the meeting, Trump did post a directive to start identifying and releasing government files on aliens, UAPs, and UFOs. However, Bigelow himself does not claim credit. Coincidence, influence, or both? What has been released since is, by Knapp’s own description, mixed: some new movement, some already-public material, and not the “big stuff” Bigelow wanted. Public episodes so far include: Ep. 1 — The Oval Office: ETs, UAPs and Disclosure Bigelow’s account of meeting Trump on February 6, 2026. youtube.com Ep. 2 — The Evolution of AAWSAP How the DIA program started, Skinwalker Ranch’s role, the failed SAP request, and talks with aerospace firms about “materials.” youtube.com Ep. 3 — ET Communication Whether politicians, lawyers, AI, or telepaths are the right path to contact. Ep. 4 — Meeting of the Moguls First on-camera sit-down with current Skinwalker Ranch owner Brandon Fugal since the 2016 sale. Bigelow built Budget Suites, then Bigelow Aerospace. One of his inflatable modules, BEAM, has been attached to the ISS. During the late 1980s/90s, he funded quietly UFO , then created NIDS in 1995. Subsequently, Knapp introduced Senator Harry Reid to NIDS. That relationship later helped produce the DIA contract known as AAWSAP (the transcript says “OSAP”; the real acronym is AAWSAP). BAASS, a Bigelow subsidiary, won the contract. Public reporting has long put the figure around $22 million. reason.com Bigelow later funded consciousness research through BICS (“do we survive physical death?”). Bigelow/Knapp have claimed the following: Aerospace contractors hold recovered craft/materials, and possibly bodies. During AAWSAP, Bigelow tried to trade access to his habitat technology for some of that material. Knapp says Bigelow did not get what he wanted and is still trying. Knapp says he took that “negotiations happened / the material is real” admission to Congress about a year earlier, with Bigelow’s permission. Russia and China also have crash materials and are trying to exploit them. That was also Reid’s national-security argument for funding the program. Questions worth arguing about: If a president said only that one sentence, would it be disclosure or just more noise? If China and Russia already know, who is the secrecy actually for? Is “confirmation without evidence” leadership, or a request that the public take a billionaire’s word for it? What would actually change the day after that sentence was spoken? Drop your take. Disclosurepress.com youtu.be/mk2TRtxurQk?si=YuFV…

Here's the full article: dailymail.com/sciencetech/ar… disclosurepress.com