Pinned Tweet
The Bipartisan Betrayal That Began Long Before MAGA
I didn’t arrive at my disillusionment because of one politician or one movement. My frustration is rooted in something far older and far deeper — a bipartisan failure stretching back more than three decades. Long before the rise of MAGA, long before the populist realignment of the 2010s, the Republican and Democratic parties had already abandoned the American people.
I watched it happen in real time.
In 1992, Ross Perot warned the country about three existential threats:
• the unchecked flow of illegal immigration
• a national debt that had already reached $4 trillion
• the deliberate dismantling of America’s industrial base
He wasn’t speaking in abstractions. He was describing a bipartisan political class that had already chosen global interests over national ones. Perot’s message wasn’t left or right — it was a diagnosis of a system that had stopped serving its citizens. And he was right. The party system of the pre‑1990 era was already doing the very things people only began noticing decades later.
Both parties ignored him.
Both parties mocked him.
Both parties united to destroy him.
Then, both parties proceeded to prove him correct.
$36,000,000,000,000.00 later, we have no industrial base and are distracted by illegal sleeper cells. We are fools and need only look in the mirror to see where accountability should be exercised.
For years, Republicans and Democrats alike expanded the debt, outsourced the manufacturing backbone of the country, and refused to secure the border. They presided over the hollowing out of towns, the collapse of wages, and the erosion of sovereignty. The betrayal wasn’t sudden; it was incremental, methodical, and bipartisan.
So when I supported political movements in later years, it was never about personalities. It was about principles — peace, sovereignty, economic independence, and a government that answers to its citizens rather than to corporate donors, foreign interests, or entrenched bureaucracies. I believed those principles were finally being revived after decades of neglect.
But the truth is harder: the system that betrayed Americans in the 1980s and 1990s never stopped. It simply adapted. It absorbed every populist wave, every outsider challenge, every attempt at reform. And today, both major parties continue to operate from the same script — endless foreign entanglements, corporate protectionism, weaponized institutions, and a political culture that punishes dissent while rewarding obedience.
The betrayal is not new. If you blame Trump, MAGA, Obama, Biden, Bush or Clinton, you are late to the party by more than 30 years.
What we are witnessing now is not the collapse of a single movement, but the culmination of a bipartisan failure that Perot warned about in 1992 — a failure to protect the border, to pay down the debt, and to preserve the industrial strength that once made America the envy of the world.
The tragedy is not that one movement faltered.
The tragedy is that the American people have been abandoned by both parties for a generation.
1
4
229
DisIsVirgil retweeted
Since I'm being forced to live with this new Congress starting January of 2027, I'm going to laugh and enjoy things if they happen.
Well, Schumer's PAC spent $67M to get that clown show El Sayed elected in MI, El Sayed is trying to get Schumer removed from Leadership. 😂😭
😂😂😂😂 All the political newbies being “amazed” at Mississippi’s Senate race.
For much of the 20th century, Mississippi was overwhelmingly Democratic. Because Southern Democratic senators and representatives often held their seats for decades, they accumulated extraordinary seniority in Congress. Under the congressional system of that era, seniority frequently translated directly into committee chairmanships and control over spending legislation.
Mississippi therefore had considerably more influence in Washington than its population alone would suggest.
The most important figures included:
Sen. John C. Stennis, Democrat, U.S. Senate 1947-1989
Sen. James O. Eastland, Democrat, U.S. Senate 1941-1978
Rep. Jamie L. Whitten, Democrat, U.S. House 1941-1995
Rep. John E. Rankin, Democrat, U.S. House 1921-1953
Rep. G. V. "Sonny" Montgomery, Democrat, U.S. House 1967-1997
They were not simply casting votes for Mississippi projects. After decades in Washington, several sat in positions from which they could influence whether projects were authorized, whether money was actually appropriated, and whether federal agencies continued supporting them year after year.
1
1
145
How did they actually "bring the money home"?
It wasn't generally a senator walking into the Treasury and demanding a Mississippi check.
It worked through several overlapping mechanisms.
1. Seniority
A Mississippi politician might serve 30, 40 or even 50 years.
That was enormously valuable.
While Mississippi elected only four House members or two senators at a given point, one of those members could eventually become chairman of a committee controlling billions of dollars.
2. Committee assignments
Members deliberately sought committees affecting Mississippi:
Appropriations
Armed Services
Agriculture
Public Works
Judiciary
Those positions mattered far more than simply having another vote on the House or Senate floor.
Stennis, for example, became one of the most powerful figures in Congress on military matters. That was particularly advantageous to a state containing military installations, defense contractors and NASA facilities.
1
121
3. Appropriations
This is probably the most important distinction.
Getting Congress to say:
"The Corps of Engineers is authorized to build this waterway"
is very different from getting Congress to appropriate another $50 million or $100 million this fiscal year to continue construction.
Large civil works projects require appropriations repeatedly over many years.
That's where a senior delegation becomes extraordinarily valuable.
4. Trading support
Congress operated heavily through bargaining:
"I'll support the project important to your state if you'll support the project important to mine."
The Tenn-Tom couldn't have survived as merely a Mississippi project. Its supporters built a coalition involving Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky and other states that expected to benefit from the waterway.
The interstate Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority itself represented Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi and Tennessee.
6
Woof on.
Texas went blue. The House and the Senate are gone.
Our kids are watching how we take a loss. Let's show them how we rally.
JoinTAB.us
4 November 2026
#vote #midterms #tab #leadwhereyoulive #globalist
7
THE PROGRAMMING CONTINUES:
FORTRESS for the government and military:
Assume the grid could fail, supply chains could break, communications could be disrupted, and critical resources could become unavailable.
The irony: an individual taking those precautions is stereotyped as a “prepper” or conspiracy theorist.
Yet when the Pentagon follows essentially the same resilience philosophy, it's considered strategic planning and risk management.
11
DisIsVirgil retweeted
Though biologically illiterate to vaccinate against any coronavirus, at least Sweden has put mRNA injections in the garbage can, where they belong.
Sweden is officially ditching mRNA vaccines, and they are not hiding their reasons for doing so.
artsencollectief.nl/zweden-k…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Misleading. Image text is from a Dutch group (Artsen Collectief), not a Swedish source. Sweden’s regions chose Sanofi’s Nuvaxovid as sole supplier for the 2027/2028 campaign only.
There has been no mRNA ban; Public Health Agency says 2026/2027 mainly uses mRNA Comirnaty.
nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artsen_Co…
adda.se/upphandling-oc…
folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publikationer-…
lakemedelsvarlden.se/myndighetsrad-…
Wow. Republicans and Democrats are so enthusiastic this year. It’s razor close with fundraising.
New FEC filings show a significant financial gap between the national parties. As of August 31, 2026, the DNC reported about $16.9M cash on hand and $17.6M in debt, while the RNC reported about $125.6M cash on hand and no debt. In August, the DNC reported $11.4M in receipts versus $18.3M for the RNC.
22
DisIsVirgil retweeted
🚨BILL GATES/BOURLA TRIAL: “These injections are a BIOLOGICAL WEAPON.”
“COVID-19 injections are LETHAL.”
“The global deployment of this biological weapon can only take place through the UNLAWFUL deception of the public on a global scale.”
“The defendants [including Bill Gates and Albert Bourla] are implementers of the ‘COVID-19: The Great Reset’ project and are GUILTY of this deception; they are therefore being sued individually in these proceedings.”
DisIsVirgil retweeted
🚨GLOBAL EXCLUSIVE: Bill Gates Is On Trial For His Covid Vaccine Maiming and Killing People In The Netherlands and Is Fighting To Block Details & Coverage!
Renowned Journalist And Former Pharma R&D Exec. Sasha Latypova Joins Alex Jones Discussing The BOMBSHELL Landmark Trial Against The MAD SCIENTISTS Behind COVID Including Bill Gates!
Latypova Exposes RFK’s Complete 180° On mRNA Shots And Is Now Protecting Bill Gates, How BILL GATES And Other COVID Criminals Are Fighting To Disguise Their Voices And Completely Prevent The Public From Seeing Them On Trial For Crimes Against Humanity And Global Genocide!
THIS IS A MUST WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW!
@sasha_latypova
DisIsVirgil retweeted
Mother took her daughter in for testing and she had elevated lead levels in her results
So she bought a bunch of lead testing swabs to find out what’s poising her daughter
She swabs Cheerios and they light up pink. Pink means they’re positive for lead. We are being poisoned
Evil.
BREAKING: 153 Nations Adopt UN Pandemic Declaration to Push FAST-TRACKED Vaccines Within 100 Days and Crack Down on “Vaccine Hesitancy”
The dangerous UN declaration raises concerns that scientific censorship, lockdowns, and experimental vaccine mandates are back on the menu.
The declaration calls for:
- FAST-TRACKED VACCINES within 100 DAYS of a pandemic threat
- “INFODEMIC MANAGEMENT” to address so-called “misinformation”
- EXPANDED GLOBAL SURVEILLANCE
- “WHOLE-OF-GOVERNMENT, WHOLE-OF-SOCIETY” pandemic response
- INTERNATIONAL PATHOGEN SHARING of biological materials
- COUNTERING “VACCINE HESITANCY”
Vaccine hesitancy is NOT misinformation.
Scientific dissent is NOT disinformation.
Questioning public-health authorities is NOT a threat to public health.
NO international pandemic framework should undermine those fundamental principles.
The Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has already gotten away with the COVID disaster, and now they’re trying to lock in the same playbook for their next global health emergency.
The United States, Israel, and Argentina are the only countries that VOTED AGAINST the declaration.
12















