The despair of a Parisian - pleading with the feral smooth brains not to destroy her store The death rattle of Paris as western civ breathes its last gasps. Notre Dame was no accident. It was the beginning of the end.

🚨🎙️ WELCOME TO… 🎙️🚨 💷 WHO WANTS TO EXPLAIN POLITICAL DONATIONS? 💷 Tonight’s contestant: 🥁🥁🥁 CLIVE LEWIS MP! You’ve been talking about big money in politics, Clive. So let’s play. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰 ROUND 1: THE £30,000 QUESTION 🎤 QUESTION: Did an individual donor give £30,000 to Compass specifically so it could provide a member of staff for your office? 🤔 YOUR ANSWER, CLIVE? A) Yes B) No C) It doesn’t count because Compass was in the middle D) Can we change the subject? 🔔 TIME’S UP. ✅ ANSWER: YES. Your parliamentary register records £30,000 from Gideon Simeloff, paid to Compass to enable it to provide a member of staff for your office until the end of October 2025. 🎙️ NEXT QUESTION: If wealthy individuals funding political activity concern you, what safeguards should apply when an individual funds an MP’s staff through another organisation? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✊ ROUND 2: UNION MONEY 🎤 QUESTION: Have you personally benefited electorally from trade-union money? 🤔 YOUR ANSWER, CLIVE? A) Yes B) No C) Only the nice kind of political money D) Phone a friend at Unite 🔔 TIME’S UP. ✅ ANSWER: YES. Your 2024 register records: 💷 Unite: £5,000 💷 Unison: £3,733 Both were support for Norwich South. 🎙️ FOLLOW-UP: If concentrations of political money are the concern, what principle determines when organised funding is acceptable? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧑‍💼 ROUND 3: FREE STAFF 🎤 QUESTION: Is Compass currently providing staff to support some of your parliamentary campaigns and activities? 🤔 YOUR ANSWER, CLIVE? A) No B) A little bit C) Yes D) Define “support” 🔔 TIME’S UP. ✅ ANSWER: YES. Your current parliamentary register puts the estimated value at: 💷 £26,210 for staff support from Compass between April 2026 and April 2027. 🎙️ FOLLOW-UP: Should voters always be able to trace externally funded political staff back to the people or organisations ultimately paying for them? YES or NO? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💷 ROUND 4: THE MILLION-POUND QUESTION 🎤 QUESTION: How much would the donation cap in amendment NC69 have been? A) £10,000 B) £50,000 C) £100,000 D) £1,000,000 🔔 LOCK IT IN. ✅ ANSWER: 💥 £1,000,000 💥 The amendment would prohibit a permissible donor from giving more than £1 million to a regulated entity in a calendar year. 🎙️ FOLLOW-UP: Why £1 million? What makes £999,999 acceptable under that proposal but £1,000,001 unacceptable? What evidence sets the line there? 🎤 We’ll take workings on the back of the envelope. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏭 ROUND 5: THE EXEMPTION ROUND 🎤 QUESTION: Would qualifying trade-union affiliation fees count towards that £1 million cap? 🤔 YOUR ANSWER, CLIVE? A) Yes B) No C) Depends who receives them D) Suddenly political money has become complicated 🔔 TIME’S UP. ✅ ANSWER: NO. The amendment explicitly excludes qualifying trade-union affiliation fees from the definition used for the cap. 🎙️ FOLLOW-UP: Why? If the objective is limiting concentrations of political funding, explain the principle for treating qualifying affiliation fees differently. No slogans. Just the principle. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 FINAL ROUND 🔥 No multiple choice. No phone-a-friend. No hiding behind somebody else’s party. 🎤 QUESTION: Would you support a political finance system where the same transparency principles apply to: 💷 wealthy individuals 🏢 companies ✊ trade unions 👥 campaigning organisations 🧑‍💼 externally funded staff ⚖️ donated professional services …whether the recipient is Labour, Reform, Conservative, Green or anyone else? ⏰ TICK TOCK… And here’s the answer voters should reasonably expect: ✅ Political funding rules should be clear. ✅ The ultimate source of significant funding should be transparent. ✅ Benefits in kind should be visible, not just cash. ✅ Any exemptions should have a publicly defensible reason. ✅ And the rules should not change depending on which party benefits. 🎙️ THANKS FOR PLAYING: 💷 WHO WANTS TO EXPLAIN POLITICAL DONATIONS? 💷 👏👏👏

No-one has said that. The target is still 1.5m homes (not 1.5m council homes - that isn’t right). It’s a really hard target and will be difficult to meet, but we are giving it a good go. Locally we should still get several 100 new homes, no change there

Thousands of Muslims with weapons are HUNTING British patriots on the streets of the UK shouting “Allah Akbar”

These are the savages that you and your idiot followers are cheerleading for: 👇🏻