Over the past week, we’ve been focused on soft rollouts of our new launch models.
Traditional bonding-curves, fixed-price, and refundable launches are all live 💫
We’ve finalized our new contracts & v4 hook, and are now just waiting for things to get whitelisted by @Uniswap.
update iOS asap
A vulnerability (worse_query) affecting iOS 26.7.1, 27.0.1, and 27.2 allows malicious apps to read local files from other apps, putting seed phrases, private keys, and login credentials at risk across the entire ecosystem. This is an iOS-level issue, not unique to Binance.
Immediate Action Required:
- Delete any apps installed from untrusted sources (such as sideloaded or manually signed IPAs).
- Update iOS and all apps to the latest official versions.
- If you suspect a breach, transfer funds to a new wallet created on a clean device and reset all active login sessions.
Never install unauthorized packages, and keep your software up to date.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Binance recommends updating iOS to the latest versions against worse_query, but researchers describe it as an unpatched 0day and Apple's iOS 27.2.1 notes omit any such fix.
github.com/forcequitOS/wo…
support.apple.com/en-us/149715
x.com/0xjohnny/statu…
DΞV◎TΞDAVΞ retweeted
The craziest thing about the hack is that even if the hacker were to sell all their eth, it’s still way less than the ethereum foundation has sold over the past 12 months
We’re reworking launches on Sinjoh:
A standard bonding-curve for more traditional launches, plus two new launch models that will reshape the risk of trading new tokens.
Details below👇
Replying to @Sinjoh
We are currently working on a handful of significant launchpad upgrades:
• New launch models are under development (Standard-Bonding Curve, Refundable Launches, and Fixed-Price Launches).
• TWAMM-style DCA buys and sells
• New holder reward options & lottery models.
Cont.👇
With the 2.0 launch imminent, there’s no better time to breakdown all the features & advantages that comes with launching on Sinjoh!
Deployers are given unmatched power & control when designing their token’s market. From pairs, taxes, protections, rewards, and more!
🧵👇
if the 2021 cycle narrative was NFTs
and the 2024-5 cycle narrative was memecoins...
...and if the next cycle's narrative is privacy/ai/quantum resistance
i think we should be expecting much higher highs on our coins, coz this is a narrative that can bring in more institutional/sophisticated capital that isn't necessarily crypto native
tough to explain to a "serious investor"..."hey bro u should buy WIF coz the dog has a hat"...but much easier to pitch "hey u should buy ZEC coz SOV, quantum etc etc"
Sinjoh 2.0 will officially go live on Robinhood Chain this Monday, October 19th 💫
Visit the Sinjoh website (link in post below) & turn the crank to discover some of the 2.0 launch day features.
It’s almost time. The ticker is $INJOH. The future is yours. The sky is the limit.
base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf rewards for holding $VCAT are automatically distributed to holders every day.
There is currently over $33,000 in base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf accrued and ready to be distributed.
Knowledge, like air, is vital to life.
Like air, no one should be denied it.
if u make life-changing money, please make sure to take profits and realise it
i get the concept of "it's early in the cycle things can go a lot higher"
but compared to previous cycles and due to AI advancements, i think the concept of defining the "cycle winner" early in the cycle and successfully holding it all the way thru is materially more risky than it ever has been
worst thing u can do is roundtrip 7 figs at the beginning of the cycle (or lose money) and then not have enough capital to play the even bigger narratives when they come
ppl often confuse the encouragement of taking profit for being bearish - that's not the case, you can be bullish but still take out initials and profits while still leaving good meat on the table to ride higher
my hunch is we'll see a lot of round-tripping before things properly get going - moreso than ever before (and it has already started tbf)
DΞV◎TΞDAVΞ retweeted
$PONS just generated $1.34 MILLION in revenue today
and the day isn't even over
this is while Robinhood chain has cooled down over the last few days
yet $PONS is still sitting at:
- $201.96 MILLION annualized revenue
- $434 MILLION market cap
- $3.7 MILLION in the buyback wallet
and that buyback wallet is still rapidly growing
all of that capital will TWAP into $PONS on the open market
while new revenue continues flowing in faster than the buyback wallet can even be depleted
let that sink in
this is a protocol generating over $200 MILLION in annualized revenue
trading at just a $434 MILLION market cap
a multi-billion-dollar protocol trading for pennies on the dollar
$PONS remains the most underrated protocols in all of crypto
how much longer can the market ignore this?
Too much grave dancing on the timeline about $PONS.
Even with today’s number, they are still a top 10 revenue generating project in all of crypto.
In time, they will learn.
DΞV◎TΞDAVΞ retweeted
think $par is an interesting little punt at ~$6-10m
not because i think it’s going to replace $pons
there’s actually very little reason right now for the majority of people launching tokens to move away from pons…it has the mindshare, liquidity and distribution
par needs to give people a reason to use it
and i think the interesting part is the ability to pair new tokens against basically anything
$DIP / $TENDIES is a good example
it’s inherently memetic, creates a relationship between two assets and gives people a completely different canvas for launching funny memes
you can imagine endless combinations around stocks, existing memes, rival communities, pairs trades etc
most will obviously go to zero
what i’m interested in is what happens if one genuinely massive runner originates on par
the first token that goes from nothing to $50m, $100m, $500m suddenly becomes the advertisement for the entire platform
people start looking for “the next one”, creators launch there because that’s where the attention is and volume starts feeding back into the platform
that’s where i think the reflexivity could get quite violent
and you’re currently paying ~$6-10m for that possibility
the early numbers are at least encouraging…
400 tokens launched
$11.9m platform volume
$160k paid to creators
43.6m $par burned
4.36% of supply gone in the first 5 hours
the $pons comparison is useful because we’ve already seen what sustained launchpad volume combined with aggressive token economics can do
but i wouldn’t pretend par has proved anything close to that yet
this could quite easily be a shiny new toy that everyone forgets about tomorrow
the first 5 hours are almost certainly the least representative 5 hours we’ll ever get and i’d expect activity to drop considerably
for me this is much more a bet on whether par produces its first breakout token
if it does, i think the combination of a genuinely different launch mechanic, creator incentives and $par being burned as the platform grows could become extremely reflexive
if it doesn’t, pons probably continues eating the overwhelming majority of launches and par slowly disappears
pretty binary outcome
but at single digit millions, i think it’s a fairly interesting one
$par
0x507B6F349a80114097A67B8b4677367acC15b220
DΞV◎TΞDAVΞ retweeted
$PONS is more undervalued here at $275M MC than it was two weeks ago $25M MC. Let me explain….
August 19th:
Pons MC - $25M
Pons daily revenue - $65k
Pons P/S - 1.05
Pons daily burn rate - 0.208% a day
September 1st:
Pons MC - $275M
Pons daily revenue - $1.03M
Pons P/S - 0.73
Pons daily burn rate - 0.375% a day
At this rate, $PONS is going to get to 50% TOTAL supply burned in the next 3 months. The market is once again pricing $PONS revenue as unsustainable.
Next few weeks are going to be VERY interesting.

























