Harvey Q3 Recap:
Metrics:
- Added over $100M ARR and crossed $400M ARR
- 97% GRR
- 20% of the Fortune 500 and 40% of the Fortune 50 use Harvey
- 80% of the Am Law 100 use Harvey
Key hires:
- @asadovsky, Chief Research Officer (former CVP AI, Microsoft AI & Distinguished Engineer, Google DeepMind)
- @stevezad, Chief Revenue Officer (former GVP Rubrik)
Product:
- Harvey II
- Horizon Scanning
- Command Center GA
Engineering:
- Agent harness end-to-end redesign
- Brought agents to Word, Outlook, Vault, and Review Tables
- Vault files 2x+ in Q3, token throughput 20x+ since January, vector DB migration, major cost & efficiency gains
AI:
- Harvey Tenet, our first model post-trained for legal
- Legal Agent Bench extensions for M&A Diligence and Firm Knowledge
- Research collaborations with @FireworksAI_HQ, @appliedcompute, @baseten, @EngramLab, and @trajectorylabs
Devon Duran retweeted
Tenet is @harvey's first model post-trained for legal
It reaches frontier performance on Legal Agent Bench and generalizes to other agentic benchmarks
Tenet comes with three subagents post-trained for specialized tasks: M&A diligence, review tables, and firm knowledge
It's Harvey's first major step towards building frontier legal intelligence and enabling firms to build their own specialized models
More from @gabepereyra:
Devon Duran retweeted
We are working with @EngramLab to train models that can understand a law firm’s knowledge.
A huge source of differentiation for a law firm comes from all the past work the firm has done. When an associate is working on a new deal they have access to decades of similar deals the firm has done and a big part of the job is knowing how to effectively leverage that knowledge.
However, a large amount of this data is either client data or derived from client data which means you can’t naively train all of it into a single model because this would mean breaking confidentially. In order to separate the research problem from the data privacy and deployment problem we built a synthetic law firm.
@ItsJulioPereyra wrote an awesome article describing the dataset, tasks and approach to creating a synthetic version of the type of data you would expect to find at a large law firm. The firm has 46 clients, 266 client matters and each client matter contains work product, versions, emails, drafts, etc that you might find when searching the DMS of a firm.
This dataset allows us to explore how well agents can reason across large corpuses of knowledge (100M+ tokens) and require complicated multi-hop reasoning. For example, answering a query like “in similar deals, how did we structure the reps and warranties” requires the model to understand what makes deals similar and then search over all past deals to find examples.
We find that generic agent approaches for this type of reasoning are both expensive and not exhaustive and there is a lot of room for improvement. Excited to open source this dataset and also share more results soon
Devon Duran retweeted
Harvey in Markel Group's Q2 earnings call today ($MKL)
Devon Duran retweeted
Was great chatting with @oneill_c and @mudithj about some of the research we've been doing together and broader AI topics
When @mudithj and I met @gabepereyra, we were expecting just another vanilla intro call and instead had the best yarn about research, the state of LLMs, and where intelligence is actually heading. It's rare to meet a founder this deep in the weeds who's also building for one of the most important verticals in this new age of intelligence
So it was awesome to sit down with Gabe for an extended discussion on what it take to build agents that can reliably complete work over hours, days, or even longer?
We talked about why agents today struggle with search and long context windows and how techniques like KV-cache compaction, synthetic data, and continual learning could help.
0:00 Introduction
0:36 Getting legal agents to review the whole data room
2:08 Data rooms larger than any context window
5:28 How far open-source models can go
7:58 Where specialist models fit in legal AI
10:59 Training legal models when client data is off-limits
13:06 Teaching a model how a law firm works
13:59 What belongs in context vs. model weights
15:36 From firm-wide AI to a model for every lawyer
18:37 What training adds beyond retrieving the right cases
20:26 Why context windows have plateaued
24:01 How models could learn continuously on the job
26:12 Can AI recursively improve AI research?
27:07 Research agents can run experiments but not choose them
30:00 Why open-ended research is hard to train
33:47 Why deployment, not intelligence, is the bottleneck
35:08 The cost of frontier intelligence
36:59 Different neolabs, different paths to intelligence
39:26 Using open datasets to compare research methods
41:13 Conclusion
Devon Duran retweeted
Q2 recap for @harvey
- +$100M NNARR
- 53% DAU/MAU
Key hires (including Q1)
- Anique (CPO) - prev VP of Product at Rippling
- Rachel (CMO) - prev CMO at Notion
- Brooks (CISO) - prev CISO at Roblox
- Keith (CSO) - prev CPO at Google
Product
- Agent unification - cloud agents can use all Harvey product surfaces
- Command center (EA) - monitor adoption and ROI by use case
- Contract intelligence (EA) - agentic contracting platform for enterprises
Eng
- Migration to cloud agent infrastructure
- Integrating open source inference providers
- Scaling document processing (54TB / week)
AI
- Legal Agent Bench
- Open source post training
- Published multiple research directions with partners
We invested heavily in cloud agent infrastructure at the end of last year and in Q1. In Q2 we also unified many of our product surfaces (collapsed as @winstonweinberg says) by making them all tools accessible by our cloud agents.
Prior to this, there were a lot of capabilities in Harvey that were often only discovered by power users. As cloud agents get better and our product becomes more connected we are seeing users discover more of the product by learning from their agents (see plot of product surfaces per user).
















