I was going to get to this on the @piersmorgan interview but sometimes it was hard to talk over the other respected guests interruptions. One of Charlie’s closest friends and one of his family's most trusted TPUSA executives called me over the phone and asked me to ask Candace @RealCandaceO to keep investigating a key individual at Turning Point. They told me also that there was an immediate attempted power grab of the control points of TPUSA shortly after Charlie’s execution. They asked me to pass their message on to Candace. We hope that helps you understand. As this person, who called, was so extremely close and loyal to the family and so very, and wonderfully, trusted by them and by Turning Point, we assumed - rightly or wrongly - that the family and other executives and board members would be aware of this private telephone request to Candace. Although this was not explicitly stated that time this was a reasonable assumption. Not least as it was a surprising request. We were quite shocked by it. Due to what we also discussed on that call which included potentially arranging positive warm meeting between Candace and the family there was no reason to think otherwise. It's was not a stretch to assume that the this request was not solely the wish of the person but also the wish of the family. The spirit of the conversation and at it heart was most certainly the desire to get to the truth about what happened on the day of Charlie's execution and to discover and uncover internal dishonesty that the person seemed to be already aware of relating to the running of and operations of TPUSA in the lead up to Charlie’s execution. We also discussed the extraordinarily unlikely ballistic probability of Charlie being killed by a 30-06. As we care about Charlie. His family, and we cared and care about this person - and Charlies Legacy - and we cared about the good people at Turning Point that we helped to fund and factually created jobs for them for years by introducing many donors and tens of millions of dollars to Charlie, naturally we passed on this persons urgent message to Candace as they had requested. This is why I think now that the suggestion from Turning Point that Candace should NOT now be investigating is rotten form and is in fact the height of bad manners. It is disingenuous. Consider this. First a close friend of Charlie and the family executive of an organization asks a person (Candace) to investigate your organization from the outside and then that organization complains when Candace does it. You really, honestly could not make it up. Although to be fair to this person I have NOT personally heard the person that made the request, yet themselves we ask that Candace’s investigation does not continue to its conclusion. This person was loyal to Charlie and his family. Or Charlie and his family most certainly thought they were and so did we. We thought that this person was well intentioned. We have spoken at length positively since the occasion of that phone call. When they called us to ask our advice on other matters relating to the leadership of TPUSA. I think we would have noticed if there was any such request from this person to stop. But as I said so far there has not been. We concluded then as we do now that at that time this person was acting in Charlie’s TPUSA’s and the family’s interest posthumously. I hope this helps. John and Irina