AI is changing how Bitcoin software gets built. Bitcoin Commons (@BTCCommons) and Plebly (@JoinPlebly) are leaning into that rather than pretending it is not happening. The risk with AI-generated code is not obvious errors. It is subtle behavioral changes that pass code review but introduce vulnerabilities or alter consensus rules in ways no one catches until it is too late. Standard review is not equipped for that. So we built BTCDecoded Intelligence, a research and review tool trained specifically on Bitcoin's protocol history, governance record, and codebase. It gives us automated review tuned to the actual failure modes of Bitcoin software rather than software in general. btcdecoded.org

I built this for a specific set of people. If you work in or around Bitcoin, this tool makes a world of difference. Protocol reviewers who need to know if an argument has been made before, by whom, and what objection it received. Researchers and journalists who need the primary source, not a synthesis. Grant programs and PR review agents scoring a submission against a spec. Companies shipping Bitcoin software that cannot afford to invent a consensus rule. Anyone writing BIPs, security notes, or historical accounts. Don't accept second best.

I've spent a year documenting Bitcoin's governance record. Every argument, every stalled proposal, every funding tie. The consistent criticism I get is that it's too much to wade through. So I built a tool that makes the entire record searchable. Now you don't have to take my word for it. Go look yourself.