Everyone's worried the market will get flooded now that anyone can make a game. Most people are consumers to their core. Finishing something still takes hundreds or thousands of hours, and the vast majority will never put that time in no matter how easy the tools make it.

Honest question to software engineers: Don’t you feel like AI took the thing that used to make you special and handed it to everyone else?

The end of software secrecy is almost upon us. The death of closed source, and the final triumph of open source. I should have realized this a few months ago when I successfully decompiled the game of Firefighter from an ancient DOS shareware binary. My robot friend was able to tell it had been written in Borland Pascal from looking at the data layout; it gave me back very readable Pascal code with sensibly chosen function and variable names. I transpiled it to Rust and now ship it as part of my heritage games collection. The thing is, I thought of this as a fun stunt but didn't have any confidence that the technique would scale up to large, real programs. I have since learned that people are now doing this sort of thing with entire AAA games, which are among the most complex software artifacts ever to be shipped as a binary. If they can be decompiled, anything can be. This has implications. Massive implications. We need to think about what the world is like when, in general, there is no longer a secrecy moat around almost any software at all. 1/2

If LLMs existed when I started coding 30 years ago, I don't see how I would have learned everything I learned the hard way about state, expressiveness, decomposition, and simplicity. These are the things I'm constantly correcting LLMs on. I hope there's a different path to this knowledge that doesn't involve getting down and dirty with every detail.