Reporter/Middle East coordinator @ICIJorg. Words in @TheAtlantic. Middle East editor @ForeignPolicy once upon a time. Leak to me: davidkenner@protonmail.com

Washington DC
Joined October 2008
A company linked to a major Trump donor received Treasury Department authorization to transact with a sanctioned Russian bank as part of the firm's purchase of a massive Armenian copper mine. icij.org/news/2026/09/trump-…
3
8
1,131
The United Nations paid roughly $10 million last year to companies formerly linked to the Assad regime. The reason these companies are still around? The new government’s opaque deals with Assad-linked business elites. icij.org/investigations/dama…
1
2
6
1,701
ICIJ revealed last year that a UN contractor, Shorouk, was secretly owned by Assad's intelligence services. Shorouk and other firms are now under the control of a new company, which didn't answer questions about its ownership or how this came about. icij.org/investigations/dama…
2
10
1,975
NEW: we caught 🇨🇳Chinese hackers... again. Twist: they're hacking journalists & activists, but we suspect they're private contractors. State repression... with a profit margin. Thread + how to protect yourself 1/ By us @citizenlab in collab w/@ICIJorg
6
188
6
469
45,169
I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. He’s not a sultan, his name is Sultan. This is obvious to anyone with a passing familiarity with the Gulf.
.@PabloReports: There was a sultan who was named? Khanna: That is the person that we're protecting. Why not put out his name. He's a sultan, a powerful person in Dubai. He's obviously allegedly involved in these crimes..
2
6
1,454
This is not to downplay his position in the UAE, a country that does not use sultan as a title.
1
1
386
This is neither here nor there but the individual’s name is Sultan, it’s not a title
You looked at the document. You know it’s an email address that was redacted. The law requires redactions for personally identifiable information, including if in an email address. And you know that the Sultan’s name is available unredacted in the files. See EFTA00666117. Be honest, and stop grandstanding.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The Epstein Files Transparency Act allows redaction of PII only in very narrow circumstances, such as an unwarranted invasion of privacy or the risk of jeopardizing a federal investigation. It is unlikely the cited email would meet that criterion. - congress.gov/bill/119th-con…
2
1,325
Harrowing and deeply important work by @DavidKenner and @NicoleSadek on the survivors of Assad's killing machine -- relatives of the missing, left to pick up the pieces without answers from the old regime or the new. A telling anecdote at the end. icij.org/investigations/dama…
1
14
2
30
8,539
I have never seen a government agency respond to a FOIA request like this. Not just: "Hey, please tell us if you're still interested in a previously submitted FOIA?" But: "We're not going to tell you which FOIA requests are outstanding, but please write us about them."
1
1
1,002
In 2023, Panama Papers whistleblower "John Doe" tried to sue the German government - but was stopped after the judge said they'd have to reveal their identity to the court. Doe said this would put their life at risk. icij.org/investigations/pana…
1
800